m.
It shouldn't be a big problem. Volunteers?
>
> NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080218/6c5104c8/attachment.pgp>
s to do it things can change ;)
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080218/8c896b4e/attachment.pgp>
On Monday 18 February 2008 15:58, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 10:59:53]:
>
> > On Sunday 17 February 2008 01:30, Tommy[D] wrote:
> > > Florent Daignière schrieb:
> > > | * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-16 23:45:00]:
> > > |
> > > |> That wil
vailable
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080218/cbd1cfb2/attachment.pgp>
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 10:59:53]:
> On Sunday 17 February 2008 01:30, Tommy[D] wrote:
> > Florent Daignière schrieb:
> > | * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-16 23:45:00]:
> > |
> > |> That will break the build for non-devs. Does it matter?
> > |
> > | No i
On Sunday 17 February 2008 01:30, Tommy[D] wrote:
> Florent Daignière schrieb:
> | * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-16 23:45:00]:
> |
> |> That will break the build for non-devs. Does it matter?
> |
> | No it doesn't. It's not like if freenet-ext was cleanly buildable
> | anywhere bu
