On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:09 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2008-07-23 20:09:00 + (Wed, 23 Jul 2008)
> New Revision: 21351
>
[...]
> Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_stun.sh
> ===
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080724/c8a1c04d/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 3) Limit any single node to no more than 30% of our outgoing requests. This
> would help in that getting 100% of a node's outgoing requests wouldn't be
> possible... but it wouldn't solve the problem. If an attacker's objective is
> to capture all the locally originated
On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:15, Volodya wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > 3) Limit any single node to no more than 30% of our outgoing requests.
This
> > would help in that getting 100% of a node's outgoing requests wouldn't be
> > possible... but it wouldn't solve the problem. If an attacker
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 3) Limit any single node to no more than 30% of our outgoing requests. This
> would help in that getting 100% of a node's outgoing requests wouldn't be
> possible... but it wouldn't solve the problem. If an attacker's objective is
> to capture all the locally originated
