[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

reenet repo (branch), I would certainly have a look! > > Ian. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

g another reason for a central server hosted by us. > > Ian. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090404/ee7c8dce/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

m. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090404/d12adbfa/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] DB4O branch merged!

cation/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090404/257ff8b7/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Invalid number format

I configured port 9000 as FProxy-Port. In the config page the value for FProxy-Port is now shown as "9k". Seems as if a wrong number format is used. -- __ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

6.29.y.git;a=tag;h=5dfd736f95b3d84a18b5bb8e50ac71f245438acf -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachme

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/4 Arne Babenhauserheide : > Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden: >> On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > $ hg sign [REVISION] >> >> git tag -s -m > > Is that a GnuPG signed tag? "-s" is "sign" > > Best wishes, > Arne

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Daniel Cheng [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: > >> 2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : >>> * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ >>> freenetproject.org>wrote: > Toad said on an other thread you

[freenet-dev] Invalid number format

I configured port 9000 as FProxy-Port. In the config page the value for FProxy-Port is now shown as 9k. Seems as if a wrong number format is used. -- __ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54

[freenet-dev] DB4O branch merged!

The DB4O branch has finally been merged! Actually it was merged on Thursday, but I've been going through the diffs to make sure I haven't done anything catastrophic. The db4o branch was a project to make Freenet use a database (db4o) for tracking the status of persistent requests and inserts,

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 09:31:06 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 15:50:28 Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Okay, so it's technically possible (anyway, pulling on a regular basis was also an option)... but do we want to fetch code from a remote host we don't

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry about