-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Are all the changes made to update.cmd compatible with the java-based
> installer? For example, juiceman removed a bunch of commands relating to
> start.cmd; certainly I haven't tested my
: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/5dc569e9/attachment.pgp>
text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/44d7dda6/attachment.pgp>
gg-shows-multipart-xmlhttprequest-prototype
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/0d038b3c/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 03:53:04 you wrote:
>> XMLLibrarian on downloads.freenetproject.org was compiled with Java 6
>> and emitting UnsupportedClassVersionError.
>> Please recompile it with Java 5 and update the binary.
>>
> It was
tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/a0f82bca/attachment.pgp>
As an aside, Matthew had asked in the past about reducing the number of
connections from the browser to the node.
Digg's new library may be able to assist- It breaks images into data uris,
and then inlines them.
Even if Freenet doesn't want to use the library, inlining images as Data
URIs may
e part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/5e0d16f6/attachment.pgp>
On May 21, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Juiceman wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3
> wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the
>> launcher (at
>>
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at
least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be
registered in the registry next to the .exe path
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:43:26 Zero3 wrote:
>> Colin Davis skrev:
>>> As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
>>> FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with
>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
>>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at
> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be
XMLLibrarian on downloads.freenetproject.org was compiled with Java 6
and emitting UnsupportedClassVersionError.
Please recompile it with Java 5 and update the binary.
ve a design note in the comments of PacketThrottle
> that it would be better to have a sorted list or red/black tree rather
> than a ticket system (where all threads wakeup); maybe a new class
> needs to be written (BulkQueue) that *only* interleaves waiters (round
> robin?) and the packet throttle then used only for actually sending
> packets.
Yeah...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/fe53d0b2/attachment.pgp>
y unreliable as a way to detect it with dynamic
external IP address, especially given that the two nodes are unable to
communicate by any other means.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090521/750183d2/attachment.pgp>
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like
>> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between
>> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like
these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between
nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are
On Friday 15 May 2009 17:05:09 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 20:36:31 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Because we were both on the same LAN, it did not connect, until I
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 03:53:04 you wrote:
XMLLibrarian on downloads.freenetproject.org was compiled with Java 6
and emitting UnsupportedClassVersionError.
Please recompile it with Java 5 and update the binary.
On Friday 15 May 2009 17:05:09 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 20:36:31 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Once connected to my node, it repeatedly RNFed on the top block of
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:43:26 Zero3 wrote:
Colin Davis skrev:
As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with
command
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at
least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be
registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking
Freenet 0.7 build 1210 is out. Sorry for the delay in announcing it. It will
be mandatory at midnight. There was also a minor git mess relating to
tagging - it was released from a local branch because I forgot to push before
tagging, although it has been merged back into master now. If you are
As an aside, Matthew had asked in the past about reducing the number of
connections from the browser to the node.
Digg's new library may be able to assist- It breaks images into data uris,
and then inlines them.
Even if Freenet doesn't want to use the library, inlining images as Data
URIs may
On May 21, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Juiceman wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 ze...@zerosplayground.dk
wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
Detecting the version of an installed application in the
launcher (at
least
On Thursday 21 May 2009 18:54:38 Colin Davis wrote:
As an aside, Matthew had asked in the past about reducing the number of
connections from the browser to the node.
Digg's new library may be able to assist- It breaks images into data uris,
and then inlines them.
Even if Freenet doesn't
On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:54:32 Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:43:26 Zero3 wrote:
Colin Davis skrev:
As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
Firefox has issues with
Interesting discussion from Frost, especially the last post at the bottom. Its
about WoTs in general and why they won't work.
- hahaha...@yle3zhs5lkiwe3fdjyqlcf5+rka - 2009.04.05 - 02:28:11GMT -
I had to forward this one here.
---
Are all the changes made to update.cmd compatible with the java-based
installer? For example, juiceman removed a bunch of commands relating to
start.cmd; certainly I haven't tested my changes with the java-based
installer.
Also, do we want to get rid of Windows support from the java-based
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:57 AM, gu...@gmx.org wrote:
Interesting discussion from Frost, especially the last post at the bottom.
Its about WoTs in general and why they won't work.
There are no (new) interesting bits.
The pain is well known among developers, repeating/explaining won't change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Are all the changes made to update.cmd compatible with the java-based
installer? For example, juiceman removed a bunch of commands relating to
start.cmd; certainly I haven't tested my
It's not all that interesting. It has been discussed to death many
times. The Advogato algorithm (or something like it) solves this
problem (not perfectly, but far, far better than the current FMS / WoT
alchemy), as I have explained in great detail.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM,
32 matches
Mail list logo
