[freenet-dev] Proposal: FreeNS

2010-01-11 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 PM, steve oliver wrote: > I was thinking out loud in the chatroom earlier, and thought that it might > help attract new users and bring enhanced usability if we had a way to > support arbitrary but secure URLs in a similar way to the public DNS system. > Perhaps th

[freenet-dev] Proposal: FreeNS

2010-01-11 Thread steve oliver
I was thinking out loud in the chatroom earlier, and thought that it might help attract new users and bring enhanced usability if we had a way to support arbitrary but secure URLs in a similar way to the public DNS system. Perhaps this has been proposed and ridiculed before, i don't know. I've t

Re: [freenet-dev] Proposal: FreeNS

2010-01-11 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 PM, steve oliver wrote: > I was thinking out loud in the chatroom earlier, and thought that it might > help attract new users and bring enhanced usability if we had a way to > support arbitrary but secure URLs in a similar way to the public DNS system. > Perhaps th

[freenet-dev] Proposal: FreeNS

2010-01-11 Thread steve oliver
I was thinking out loud in the chatroom earlier, and thought that it might help attract new users and bring enhanced usability if we had a way to support arbitrary but secure URLs in a similar way to the public DNS system. Perhaps this has been proposed and ridiculed before, i don't know. I've t

[freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninstalling Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
of things they need to > know to keep their privacy in the installer. The solution is to bundle a > README file that nobody will read, and then when somebody gets killed because > of our negligence we can say it was because they didn't read the README. Oh > and we can make it prom

[freenet-dev] Library - request for testers

2010-01-11 Thread Ximin Luo
On 11/01/10 16:30, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 10 January 2010 11:35:47 Ximin Luo wrote: >> http://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-staging >> >> If anyone has some free time, please check out the above repo and run the >> test: >> >> $ git clone git://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-s

[freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninstalling Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
iveThread*.tmp and jcpuid*.tmp > though those files are much smaller. I thought we had fixed that? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message pa

[freenet-dev] Library - request for testers

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
ature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100111/68cae9dd/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Old pages in the website directory

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100111/db8f5d62/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninstalling Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread steve oliver
As far as i can tell, the izPack uninstaller (which appears to be auto-generated during install or something), is completely broken on Mac. I did a test install with the offline installer, set it up and let it run a bit, then ran the uninstaller. It only has 2 buttons and a checkbox, clicking

Re: [freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninstalling Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread steve oliver
As far as i can tell, the izPack uninstaller (which appears to be auto-generated during install or something), is completely broken on Mac. I did a test install with the offline installer, set it up and let it run a bit, then ran the uninstaller. It only has 2 buttons and a checkbox, clicking

Re: [freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninstallin g Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 07 December 2009 12:51:24 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:58:21PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > > This guy raises concerns about uninstalling Freenet: > > > > http://truefalsebollox.blogspot.com/2009/11/freenet-users-watch-your-back.html > > "First of all, there is tal

Re: [freenet-dev] Library - request for testers

2010-01-11 Thread Ximin Luo
On 11/01/10 16:30, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 10 January 2010 11:35:47 Ximin Luo wrote: >> http://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-staging >> >> If anyone has some free time, please check out the above repo and run the >> test: >> >> $ git clone git://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-s

Re: [freenet-dev] Blog comments on difficulties uninst alling Freenet

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 07 December 2009 21:53:57 p01air3 p01air3 wrote: > About temporary files deletion, here is a suggestion from FMS: > > > Hello, > > When the freenet node crashes the datastore must be checked at the next node > boot. This process creates auxiliary temporary files called > bloom-A_BIG_NU

Re: [freenet-dev] Library - request for testers

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 10 January 2010 11:35:47 Ximin Luo wrote: > http://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-staging > > If anyone has some free time, please check out the above repo and run the > test: > > $ git clone git://github.com/freenet/plugin-Library-staging.git > $ cd plugin-Library-staging > $ ant j

Re: [freenet-dev] Old pages in the website directory

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 10 January 2010 02:49:29 cvol...@gmail.com wrote: > 2010/1/9 Matthew Toseland > > > On Tuesday 05 January 2010 06:56:44 Clément Vollet wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > While I was translating some pages into french, I noticed that a lot of > > pages > > > seem to be unused. > > > Maybe w