-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2010 07:35 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2010 14:09:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> When a new opennet node is created, we create 40 ConnectionTokens.
>>
>> A ConnectionToken is basically just a public/private keypair.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Automatically connecting to our friends' friends (at HIGH not MAXIMUM) to get
> enough peers quickly.
When i've proposed something like that years ago (when Opennet was not
implemented yet) my proposal was struck down due to it not likely to create
: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/b6ea0ad5/attachment.pgp>
x27;s better to show the warning,
> and
> then allow direct download if the person chooses to do that.
I guess we could list them separately but is it really worth the complexity?
Also this isn't about filtering, it's about dangerous content types, which we
can't filter.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/66d502aa/attachment.pgp>
be clusters of users on the same ISP etc.
>
> I think students is the large proportion of the Freenet population, and as
> such
> it *is* a big concern. We want to make it as easy as possible to introduce
> your
> flatmates and others to Freenet. Of course, we can say "get them to use
> DarkNet", but at that time they only know you.
>
> > So maybe this is a dead end, although we can do some very basic local limits
> > - As Ian originally suggested, if we have two peers in the same /16, dump
> > both of them.
>
> Would this open you up to a dos attack against a known IP range? Possibly and
> attack that is run by the ISP to ensure that from their addresses nobody can
> use
> Freenet.
On a local level (single node checking its peers' IPs), no.
>
> > - On a seednode, limit any given IP address to a small number of
> > announcements over a given period of time.
This might conceivably.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/c4eded4d/attachment.pgp>
x27;t recall being
strongly opposed to the proposal.
Feel free to do your victory dance.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu
y suggested, if we have two peers in the same /16, dump both
of them.
- On a seednode, limit any given IP address to a small number of announcements
over a given period of time.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/7f656dfc/attachment.pgp>
was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/8b793847/attachment.pgp>
On 08/12/10 02:09, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to have another Freenet mini-summit next year?
> Sometime in early summer, at which point 0.8 will (presumably) have shipped,
> in some convenient London perhaps? Or was last time a fluke derived from
> various people just happeni
__
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/c08e6d5a/attachment.html>
at sensearray.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/e72c9725/attachment.html>
Schedule it for next week then :)
Friday is the day people finish early to go to the pub/on weekend. It's not the
day they geek on IRC for a meeting.
Florent
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:54:10PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:57:40 Florent Daigniere wrote:
> >
xt part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/27314188/attachment.pgp>
On Dec 8, 2010, at 15:27, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> 3) FPI pays for any long haul flights I need. :)
>
> One question: Are you a good swimmer? ;-)
>
> I'm not committed to doing it in the US by any means, I like to travel to the
> UK at l
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> 3) FPI pays for any long haul flights I need. :)
One question: Are you a good swimmer? ;-)
I'm not committed to doing it in the US by any means, I like to travel to
the UK at least once a year as I have a lot of friends there.
My point
summit next year?
> > > Sometime in early summer, at which point 0.8 will (presumably) have
> > > shipped, in some convenient London perhaps? Or was last time a fluke
> > > derived from various people just happening to be in the UK at the time?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/e203432f/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:40:25PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose to go ahead with the planned IRC meeting this Friday. We agreed to
> have them every 4 weeks on a Friday. infinity0 won't be available. I'm quite
> happy to chair it. It will occur at 19:00 UTC on #freenet-meeting on
>
rubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/a7935e33/attachment.pgp>
bute to it:
http://ietherpad.com/iTzcULhK3k
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachm
luke
> > derived from various people just happening to be in the UK at the time?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/578f9a97/attachment.pgp>
> Friday is the day people finish early to go to the pub/on weekend. It's not
> the day they geek on IRC for a meeting.
Agreed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://fre
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 06:41:34 Volodya wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 08:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 December 2010 04:42:37 Volodya wrote:
> >>> - /download/ and the Download link linking to it have been removed.
> >>> Click the key instead.
> >>> - One reason for this was /d
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:15:37 Volodya wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 07:35 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Friday 03 December 2010 14:09:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> When a new opennet node is created, we create 40 ConnectionTokens.
> >>
> >> A ConnectionToken is basically just a public/priv
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:06:03 Volodya wrote:
> > Automatically connecting to our friends' friends (at HIGH not MAXIMUM) to
> > get enough peers quickly.
>
> When i've proposed something like that years ago (when Opennet was not
> implemented yet) my proposal was struck down due to it not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2010 07:35 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2010 14:09:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> When a new opennet node is created, we create 40 ConnectionTokens.
>>
>> A ConnectionToken is basically just a public/private keypair.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Automatically connecting to our friends' friends (at HIGH not MAXIMUM) to get
> enough peers quickly.
When i've proposed something like that years ago (when Opennet was not
implemented yet) my proposal was struck down due to it not likely to create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 08:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 04 December 2010 04:42:37 Volodya wrote:
>>> - /download/ and the Download link linking to it have been removed.
>>> Click the key instead.
>>> - One reason for this was /download/ would no
On Friday 03 December 2010 14:09:04 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> When a new opennet node is created, we create 40 ConnectionTokens.
>
> A ConnectionToken is basically just a public/private keypair.
>
> In order to validate the tokens and thus be able to use them, we ask 5
> seednodes to sign our to
I propose that before 0.8.0, we separate the opennet question, and get the
wording right.
After 0.8.0, we need a big push for darknet.
Basically the objectives would be: (most of these are configurable)
- Make darknet secure by fixing the Pitch Black attack.
- Make it faster (more connections) b
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 01:08:51 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 00:44:51 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > But as you said previously no one uses darknet. How about a semi open net
> > that uses a WOT attribute to decide what nodes to trust?
>
> That would allow a direc
/attachments/20101208/b0f59721/attachment.pgp>
Schedule it for next week then :)
Friday is the day people finish early to go to the pub/on weekend. It's not the
day they geek on IRC for a meeting.
Florent
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:54:10PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:57:40 Florent Daigniere wrote:
> >
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:57:40 Florent Daigniere wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:40:25PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I propose to go ahead with the planned IRC meeting this Friday. We agreed
> > to have them every 4 weeks on a Friday. infinity0 won't be available. I'm
> > quite
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:40:25PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose to go ahead with the planned IRC meeting this Friday. We agreed to
> have them every 4 weeks on a Friday. infinity0 won't be available. I'm quite
> happy to chair it. It will occur at 19:00 UTC on #freenet-meeting on
>
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:38:45 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 05:50:05 Daxter wrote:
> > I would like to second your motion to meet in/near Texas. As a college
> > student, that's the only way I could afford to attend.
>
> Okay, I'll add a proviso that I *won't* m
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 01:08:51 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 00:44:51 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > But as you said previously no one uses darknet. How about a semi open net
> > that uses a WOT attribute to decide what nodes to trust?
>
> That would allow a direc
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:40:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I propose to go ahead with the planned IRC meeting this Friday. We agreed to
> have them every 4 weeks on a Friday. infinity0 won't be available. I'm quite
> happy to chair it. It will occur at 19:00 UTC on #freenet-meeting on
> ir
I propose to go ahead with the planned IRC meeting this Friday. We agreed to
have them every 4 weeks on a Friday. infinity0 won't be available. I'm quite
happy to chair it. It will occur at 19:00 UTC on #freenet-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
The agenda can be found here, please contribute to it:
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 05:50:05 Daxter wrote:
> I would like to second your motion to meet in/near Texas. As a college
> student, that's the only way I could afford to attend.
Okay, I'll add a proviso that I *won't* meet anywhere outside of Western
Europe. :) If we have too many americans
?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101208/c7b72864/attachment.pgp>
40 matches
Mail list logo
