Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012, 14:48:08 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
> Yes i know. But we are working about accessibility for
> developpers too !
>
>
>- Velocity for templating
>- html+jsp for site rendering
>- gwt+nonjs for components and components rendering
How does havin
.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/60ec283a/attachment.pgp>
know, I have proposed to rewrite the Freenet GUI in context
>>> of GSoC 2012 (see http://goo.gl/kOEAU and http://goo.gl/QhPVD) In
>>> order to avoid duplicate implementations, I would really like to get more
>>> insight about your current approach and implementation using GWT.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Pouyan
>>>
>>
>>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/6f4c0cec/attachment.html>
On Tuesday 10 Apr 2012 19:32:20 Juiceman wrote:
> Should we do something about the amount of announcements/refs handed
> out? Seems a good way to harvest opennet (known problem, but perhaps
> we could slow it down...) or perhaps monopolize/monitor the key-space
> somehow?
We could slow down path
ttp://goo.gl/kOEAU and http://goo.gl/QhPVD) In order to
>> avoid duplicate implementations, I would really like to get more insight
>> about your current approach and implementation using GWT.
>>
>> Regards
>> Pouyan
>>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/b04a0e5f/attachment.html>
popular
projects, so download bandwidth is unlikely to be an issue.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/4dde0900/attachment.pgp>
- Nicolas Hernandez
> *
>> Concerning GWT*:
>> *If all devs and the leader of http://goo.gl/QhPVD are ok to use GWT *we
>> can consider rewriting FProxy using GWT components.
>> We can use GWT as a pool of components only.
>> -> Using Velocity for templating (if needed).
>> -> using jsp like pages
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Nicolas Hernandez <
nicolas.hernan...@aleph-networks.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> *First of all*;
>
>- http://goo.gl/kOEAU
>- http://goo.gl/QhPVD
>
> Are ok for me, the only reason i prefer going to gwt is the team. It is
> easier to find dev using GWT than
On Thursday 12 Apr 2012 04:07:02 Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> >
> > It appears we can just compare the bytecode however. If you want to compare
> > the disassembly that's good too, but somebody should check the source.
> >
> > I have uploaded a basic version of a bytecode verification script called
>
are it to the HTTPS jars of course)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120412/e42f4e39/attachment.pgp>
10 matches
Mail list logo
