[freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

2013-07-23 Thread Rom.
Le 23/07/2013 16:07, Juiceman a ?crit : > Sent from my wireless phone. > On Jul 23, 2013 6:20 AM, "Matthew Toseland" > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 11:01:16 Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> On Monday 22 Jul 2013 11:47:17 Rom. wrote: Hello, I would like to expose some thoughts ab

[freenet-dev] MAST Attack

2013-07-23 Thread Robert Hailey
On 2013/07/23 (Jul), at 11:54 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We haven't quantified this. Maybe we should, but it doesn't seem a good use > of scarce resources to implement a toolkit for an attack that we're not sure > how to beat! At least not if I do it. I don't think we'd need a full toollkit

[freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

2013-07-23 Thread Victor Denisov
> One problem with the yubikey thing is it takes time to deliver them. > Hence the need to be able to just buy an invite e.g. with BTC. I agree that yubikey can't be the only way to introduce core nodes. There should be a (near) instant method as well. > On the level of tunnels - what I would con

[freenet-dev] MAST Attack

2013-07-23 Thread Robert Hailey
On 2013/07/23 (Jul), at 5:08 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > if I can't beat MAST I'll go mad. Is this "Mobile Attacker Static Target"? I was not able to quickly find a past thread with such a title. > MAST: Listen for a predictable request/insert, triangulate roughly where > the originator is o

[freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

2013-07-23 Thread Juiceman
Sent from my wireless phone. On Jul 23, 2013 6:20 AM, "Matthew Toseland" wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 11:01:16 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Monday 22 Jul 2013 11:47:17 Rom. wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to expose some thoughts about the current move for the > > > deployment o

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 16:56:03 Rom. wrote: > > > AV's are capable of reading inside zip (and probably other common > archives). Hence, if freenet.exe is flagged, the archive will probably > be flagged too. I have some doubts about the fact that if AV's have seen > the file before they will be less

Re: [freenet-dev] MAST Attack

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 16:30:57 Robert Hailey wrote: > > On 2013/07/23 (Jul), at 5:08 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > if I can't beat MAST I'll go mad. > > Is this "Mobile Attacker Static Target"? I was not able to quickly find a > past thread with such a title. Mobile attacker source tracin

[freenet-dev] GSoC mid-term review in one week!

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Mid-terms can be submitted from the 29th of July. Students should have some idea where they are going and some code by now ... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu

Re: [freenet-dev] Securing opennet *might* be possible ... but it will be radical

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
It might be possible to do a mostly-distributed revalidation protocol, i.e. avoid having to contact the bootstrap/seednodes regularly, but still limit nodes and connections per IP address to make Sybil more expensive... Re: Would you pay to join opennet? From: toad-notrust@h2RzPS4fEzP0zU43GAfEgx

Re: [freenet-dev] Bundles

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 01:45:26 Matthew Toseland wrote: > What about bundles? > - Inserts are mainly slow because of the downstream nodes, right? Inserts go > to 20+ nodes atm. > - So the number of parallel bundles necessary, even to maintain full speed, > may be relatively low? > - Lets say we g

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 11:01:16 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 22 Jul 2013 11:47:17 Rom. wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to expose some thoughts about the current move for the > > deployment of Freenet on windows platforms. > > > > Currently as far as i understand, toad and operhiem1

[freenet-dev] Fwd: Bundles

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
One last gasp on security. There are lots of things we can do in the longer term, notably darknet enhancements and PISCES tunnels. But if I can't beat MAST I'll go mad. ROUGH PRIORITY LIST: (For me; there are others working on WoT, UI enhancements etc) - Smallish usability fixes etc. (Including

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 Jul 2013 09:32:31 Victor Denisov wrote: > > One problem with the yubikey thing is it takes time to deliver them. > > Hence the need to be able to just buy an invite e.g. with BTC. > > I agree that yubikey can't be the only way to introduce core nodes. > There should be a (near) insta

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts about Freenet deployment on Windows platforms.

2013-07-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 22 Jul 2013 11:47:17 Rom. wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to expose some thoughts about the current move for the > deployment of Freenet on windows platforms. > > Currently as far as i understand, toad and operhiem1 are the only to > maintain the windows installer of Freenet. > This Fr