At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:30:48 -0800,
Travis Wellman wrote:
> Seems to me that it's less 'who' that matters and more 'what
> terms'. Most significantly the objectives of the project should not
> be under influence,
I think so, too - as toad said, we must not grow too dependent, and we
must ensure t
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:24:59 +,
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > freenet → Funding for freenet - limiting funders? We need your opinion
> I am in favour of accepting government funding, provided that we don't
> become totally dependant on it. I don't believe government introducing
> backdoors and go
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:26:33 +,
Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > To avoid losing that great work, it would be important to get it
> > merged quickly. Bitrot only gets worse if it is ignored.
> There are a number of serious issues, mostly related to locking. I
> believe I have sent the corresponda
Hi Chetan,
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:22:20 +0530,
Chetan Hosmani wrote:
>
> I don't have the time to merge these changes and technically not allowed to
> without obtaining explicit exception from my firm. But I have said several
> times that I can actively help anyone who is willing to do this.
…
>
