This person put quite a bit of time into providing feedback on the new
site. Probably not stuff we want to hear, but very valuable:
https://www.reddit.com/r/design_critiques/comments/3ri38h/we_recently_redesigned_our_website_would_love/cwoq0n4
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 07:49 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 07:41 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> ...
> > Did you see https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Research_challenges or the
> > section titled "Do we understand Freenet?" on toad's blog?
No I missed those.
> Also this thread:
> https
+1 from me for mentioning 501c3 status near the button, or mentioning it
earlier on the donate page (or both).
On Nov 4, 2015 7:39 AM, "Michael Grube" wrote:
>
> Should the website maybe also mention Freenet's 501c3 status near the
> donation bar?
> On Nov 4, 2015 10:34 AM, "Ian Clarke" wrote:
>
Cool.
Some feedback here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/design_critiques/comments/3ri38h/we_recently_redesigned_our_website_would_love/
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> We're aware of the excessive vertical space and are working on fixing it.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, 10:39 AM
Agreed. It's been there on all versions of donation bar, and I haven't
diagnosed that yet.
Cheers,
Dan
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Juiceman wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2015 9:54 AM, wrote:
>>
>> First of all, very good how the donation money bar on the website
> currently is - https://freenetproject
On Nov 4, 2015 9:54 AM, wrote:
>
> First of all, very good how the donation money bar on the website
currently is - https://freenetproject.org/index.html
> Clear improvement to the vague donation time bar, which wasn't really
motivating to donate as such and by it's boring small design.
>
> Sugges
We're aware of the excessive vertical space and are working on fixing it.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, 10:39 AM Michael Grube wrote:
> Should the website maybe also mention Freenet's 501c3 status near the
> donation bar?
> On Nov 4, 2015 10:34 AM, "Ian Clarke" wrote:
>
> > I like the donation bar, and
Should the website maybe also mention Freenet's 501c3 status near the
donation bar?
On Nov 4, 2015 10:34 AM, "Ian Clarke" wrote:
> I like the donation bar, and the website is a huge improvement.
>
> However, I'm still very concerned about how much blank space there is on
> our front page, while y
I like the donation bar, and the website is a huge improvement.
However, I'm still very concerned about how much blank space there is on
our front page, while you have to scroll down to see any kind of real
explanation of what Freenet is. The bulk of the information is below the
fold. I really t
First of all, very good how the donation money bar on the website currently is
- https://freenetproject.org/index.html
Clear improvement to the vague donation time bar, which wasn't really
motivating to donate as such and by it's boring small design.
Suggestion:
1. Place the donation money bar b
On 11/04/2015 07:41 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
...
> Did you see https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Research_challenges or the
> section titled "Do we understand Freenet?" on toad's blog?
> USK@yGvITGZzrY1vUZK-4AaYLgcjZ7ysRqNTMfdcO8gS-LY,-ab5bJVD3Lp-LXEQqBAhJpMKrKJ19RnNaZMIkusU79s,AQACAAE/toad/55/
Al
On 11/04/2015 07:02 AM, Bob Ham wrote:
...
> That is extremely unhelpful. I've done my research, I've looked through
> the website and the wiki and on Freenet and I've read some of the papers
> linked on the website. I've not found anywhere a description of the
> fundamental problems which Toad s
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 13:10 +0100, Bert Massop wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
> > I'm not interested in discussions about mailing list policies.
>
> Have a look at the subject of the message you replied to. This thread
> is in fact about mailing list policies. If you're n
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
> I'm not interested in discussions about mailing list policies.
Have a look at the subject of the message you replied to. This thread
is in fact about mailing list policies. If you're not interested in
that subject, please refrain from replying.
—
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 12:02 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 04/11/15 11:55, Bob Ham wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote:
> >> we also haven't encountered any unsolvable
> >> technical goals with how it is.
> >
> > Toad says there are fundamental problems with Freenet. Is that no
On 04/11/15 11:55, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote:
>> we also haven't encountered any unsolvable
>> technical goals with how it is.
>
> Toad says there are fundamental problems with Freenet. Is that not the
> case?
Please stop posting unconstructive comments like
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote:
> we also haven't encountered any unsolvable
> technical goals with how it is.
Toad says there are fundamental problems with Freenet. Is that not the
case?
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On 11/04/2015 02:40 AM, xor wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 08:38:06 PM Ian Clarke wrote:
>> I don't think censorship is the answer :)
...
> Also, there is the psychological effect of destroying the motivation of
> everyone who reads those threads, including the volunteers.
It certainly is
18 matches
Mail list logo
