Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

2016-08-08 Thread xor
Same as my last mail about the website, I'll try to have this be the last mail with regards to our discussion here. This sub-thread here isn't helping the project, so I should stop replying to it. Unlike the one to Ian, this one is *not* going to try to be positive. In fact, it will not only be

Re: [freenet-dev] Revamp of front page of our website

2016-08-08 Thread xor
Hey, I do realize that I'm annoying you very much with my statements. Thus I'll try to have this be the last email involved in the discussion of your website plans for now. I'll instead stick to writing actual code to trim the website in preparation of a potential revamp. Less input = less work

Re: [freenet-dev] Financial allocation poll stage 3

2016-08-08 Thread Stephen Oliver
Attached are my votes as CSV Thanks :) ——BEGIN—— Task category / Task,Value,% of total Remaining,0,0% ,, Instructions,, "The goal of this stage of the funding allocation procedure is to estimate ""value"" of individual tasks. Value shall measure how useful each task would be to our users, to

Re: [freenet-dev] Revamp of front page of our website

2016-08-08 Thread Ian Clarke
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 9:57 PM, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: (And in case I didn't say that clear enough: This work is not intended to force a decision in favor of the old site. I will of course accept it if the votes of the poll show that a majority wants a redesign and the value per cost of

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

2016-08-08 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 07:16 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > This is why Ian is talking about "a ground-up redesign". What's > > suggested is that it won't be a "migration". > > Exactly.  We need to start fresh with the structure and the copy, > keeping the main site much more focussed on educating

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

2016-08-08 Thread Ian Clarke
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Florent Daigniere < nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > This is why Ian is talking about "a ground-up redesign". What's > suggested is that it won't be a "migration". Exactly. We need to start fresh with the structure and the copy, keeping the main site much

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we just go ahead and redesign the website?

2016-08-08 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 00:38 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Sunday, August 07, 2016 01:12:17 PM Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > Improvements are great, but the website requires a ground-up > > redesign by a > > professional designer. Unless a suitable professional designer > > volunteers to

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

2016-08-08 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 00:11 +0200, x...@freenetproject.org wrote: > On Sunday, August 07, 2016 08:24:59 AM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > > > > > > > I've also voted for that. > > > > > > So in other words: I am totally willing to deal with fundraising > > > while being  > > > an employee should

[freenet-dev] About the project

2016-08-08 Thread x...@freenetproject.org
articles are not finished yet. I'll let people know when they are. -- hopstolive (keyword for Ians spam filter) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20160808/77fab79f/attachment.sig>