On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 11:05, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> It basically looks like the nightmare scenario of a ground-up rebuild.
>
If only there were a simple, distributed content replication system that
could be used to anonymously store content like the freenet website on
arbitrary nodes in the
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 10:48, Ali-Reza Anghaie wrote:
>
> I see the same behavior, after two/three days the in/out drops to nothing..
> but I ~don't~ see a memory issue. A restart does kick it back off though.
>
> > I notice that this is the first version to use over 200 meg of
> > JVM memory.
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 18:25, Derek Glidden wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 17:53, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > Try switching to using FastThreadFactory (setting your maxThreads to
> > -120 (or whatever value you want time -1)). I think it may be caused by
> >
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 17:53, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
> Try switching to using FastThreadFactory (setting your maxThreads to
> -120 (or whatever value you want time -1)). I think it may be caused by
> some by threadfactory issue - if it is that should provide a quick fix.
>
> Tell me if that
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 13:20, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Does anyone have this graph:
>
> http://localhost:8889/diagnostics/graphs?var=jobsExecuted
>
> for the last 12 hours or so? It would be interesting to see.
>
> Ian.
http://www.bigfatdomain.com/freenet/
It *is* interesting. I've taken
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 13:20, Ian Clarke wrote:
Does anyone have this graph:
http://localhost:8889/diagnostics/graphs?var=jobsExecuted
for the last 12 hours or so? It would be interesting to see.
Ian.
http://www.bigfatdomain.com/freenet/
It *is* interesting. I've taken another
For those developers interested in compiling to native code:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~rob/manta/
Just saw the announcement; no idea if it works. It seems to be
Linux-specific.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
Karl.Dietz at triplan.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have commit configure tests for -lnsl and -lsocket (see commitlog).
>
> to Derek Glidden:
> Could you test the new configure script?
> There also seems to be an issue with Solaris / multithreaded apps
> and Alarm Clock (S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have commit configure tests for -lnsl and -lsocket (see commitlog).
to Derek Glidden:
Could you test the new configure script?
There also seems to be an issue with Solaris / multithreaded apps
and Alarm Clock (SIGALRM). e.g. in the random number
ducts, failure is not an option --
it's a standard component.
Choose your life. Choose your future.Derek Glidden
Choose Linux. http://www.illusionary.com/
___
Devl mailing list
> David McNab wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick one to inform that, owing to a sad lack of flames, I've
> put NodeConfig (the windows GUI-based node config utility) under CVS.
>
> You'll find it in Contrib/wininstall/NodeConfig, in Freenet's CVS
> (*not* FreeWeb CVS). It's too general to live
Tavin Cole wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:06:11PM -0400, Derek Glidden wrote:
> >
> > This is the message I'm getting:
> >
> > java.io.IOException: range unavailable: 39431492->39497272
> > at
> > Freenet.node.stor
Derek Glidden wrote:
>
> "Scott G. Miller" wrote:
> >
> > This is a common problem. How long has your node been operating before
> > this happened?
>
> Probably three or four weeks since the last time I had any major
> problems and had to clear the
This is the message I'm getting:
java.io.IOException: range unavailable: 39431492->39497272
at
Freenet.node.store.DFSDirectory.allocate(DFSDirectory.java:180)
at
Freenet.node.store.DFSDataStore.makeBucket(DFSDataStore.java:203)
at Freenet.node.Node.makeNode(Node.java:962)
Ian Clarke wrote:
So it seems that Oskar and Tavin are now arguing that it is fine if
users download Freenet, start the installation, are manually directed by
the installation to the Freenet website where they can obtain some seed
node addresses which they must manually enter into the
Oskar Sandberg wrote:
The problem with all of these approaches is that it is very hard to tell
when it is OK for there to be private network addresses and when it is
not. It is basically either looking at the Interfaces available and
making a guess, or asking the user.
I brought up a
Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0400, Derek Glidden wrote:
> <>
> > Most firewalls nowadays, or at least the ones being managed by competent
> > admins, take a "Deny by default" approach. In other words, not only on
> > inb
Benjamin Coates wrote:
>
> >From Mr.Bad
>
> >So, is the following statement true?
> >
> >"You can run a Freenet node behind a firewall iff
> >
> > a) The firewall allows the node to make outbound connections
> >on arbitrary ports.
>
> Are there a significant number
Benjamin Coates wrote:
From Mr.Bad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, is the following statement true?
You can run a Freenet node behind a firewall iff
a) The firewall allows the node to make outbound connections
on arbitrary ports.
Are there a significant number
19 matches
Mail list logo
