Are you using the latest CVS version? I put in a fix for something very
> >similar after the latest official release went out.
>
> I don't know what you fixed, but the lines I quoted are still in the CVS.
>
> -Stefan
>
> - Original Message -
> Fro
Are you using the latest CVS version? I put in a fix for something very
> >similar after the latest official release went out.
>
> I don't know what you fixed, but the lines I quoted are still in the CVS.
>
> -Stefan
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &quo
t;Retrieve
> anyway, see the source or
> return to gateway page");
>
> It would suffice to convert %2F back to / after the encoding - or write your
> own URLEncoder... do you want me to supply a patch?
>
> -Stefan
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD
Retrieve
>anyway, see the source or HREF=\"/\">return to gateway page");
>
> It would suffice to convert %2F back to / after the encoding - or write your own
>URLEncoder... do you want me to supply a patch?
>
> -Stefan
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:16:13AM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> Can you please try the attached diff and let me know if it solves the problem?
And here is the actual diff. ;)
-- next part --
Index: HttpHandlerServlet.j
rapidly?
>
> David
>
> --
> David Findlay
> --
> Email: david_j_findlay at yahoo.com.au
> Homepage: http://users.bigpond.com/nedz/
>
> Segmentation Fault.
> (Core dumped)
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:16:13AM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> Can you please try the attached diff and let me know if it solves the problem?
And here is the actual diff. ;)
Index: HttpHandlerServlet.java
===
RCS file: /cvsr
rapidly?
>
> David
>
> --
> David Findlay
> --
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://users.bigpond.com/nedz/
>
> Segmentation Fault.
> (Core dumped)
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:28:57AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:
> Dev Random writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > (Note, I'm crossposting to devl and tech lists - please reply to tech...)
> >
> > I've been thinking about the issues surrounding file shar
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:26:54AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 12:55:13AM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > Hi all,
> < w >
>
> Not here. Go talk to ZKS or something.
How is this relevant, given that:
- ZKS does not pr
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:28:57AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:
> Dev Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > (Note, I'm crossposting to devl and tech lists - please reply to tech...)
> >
> > I've been thinking abo
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:26:54AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 12:55:13AM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > Hi all,
> < w >
>
> Not here. Go talk to ZKS or something.
How is this relevant, given that:
- ZKS does not pr
of same rate can be aggregated for in-between power of two rates,
e.g. 2KB/s (does this buy anything, over just providing those rates?).
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
N
utes of
same rate can be aggregated for in-between power of two rates,
e.g. 2KB/s (does this buy anything, over just providing those rates?).
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:33:38AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:21:40PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > What about a Whitelist plus HashCash for people not on the list?
> > The recipient could specify how much HashCash they want.
> >
> > Als
TuringCash was meant as food for thought...
HashCash is pretty easy to implement. See
http://www.cypherspace.org/~adam/hashcash/ .
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 01:52:52AM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> > TuringCash works like this. Specify a little virtual machine with a very
> > clean instruction set.
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:33:38AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:21:40PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > What about a Whitelist plus HashCash for people not on the list?
> > The recipient could specify how much HashCash they want.
> >
> > Als
_
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
; Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
S
ash is that when a hard to defeat puzzle
> generator is written I will be happy to add support for optional think
> cash to arbitrary indices and until then there's not much to talk about.
>
>
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAI
* We agree to indemnify Sun against any problems with the
> JRE. This seems totally reckless and stupid.
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
* We agree to indemnify Sun against any problems with the
> JRE. This seems totally reckless and stupid.
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
Okay, this is now fixed.
It was introduced by someone when the code to redirect '?key=' to '/key' went
in. The url must be re-encoded.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:05:46PM +0100, toad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:49:01PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > I sa
-- with apologies to Leon Trotsky
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
-- next part --
A non-te
with apologies to Leon Trotsky
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
Was there any work required on the fproxy security filter?
I looked at a couple of older bugs (space in URLs and leaking threads on
security warning), but couldn't reproduce them. Maybe they were fixed
while I was away.
So let me know if there's anything outstanding.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:
ateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ian.
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
Agreed. I was thinking that a node should refuse to provide all of
the shares required to reconstruct a file. Then it's up to the client
to do the final reconstruction after communicating with multiple server
nodes. (This client/server separation is not compatible with the current
design.)
There
, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:12:47PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > Break up the data into shares that have to be combined in order to
> > recover the original. Distribute the shares in the system.
> > This way no node contains data that is useful/incriminating all
> > by itself.
>
Break up the data into shares that have to be combined in order to
recover the original. Distribute the shares in the system.
This way no node contains data that is useful/incriminating all
by itself.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:27:40AM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> > Let's say that someone decides t
ute force key cracking then I'd love to hear it.
>
>
>
> ___________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Dev Random
Fingerprint: 3ABC FCEF 1BCE 4528 E4FD 15EB 173A 76D2 6959 DAF1
PGP signature
By the way, if y'all want to debug threads in Java you should know about
the thread-dump feature. Under UNIX you can get a dump by sending SIGQUIT
to the process. Under Windows control-break. This will give you the
list of threads with stack traces and also locks and such. Very useful
for figur
d as having that size for this method.
>
> Done - the exact threshold can be configured in the .freenetrc file.
>
> Ian.
>
> ___
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailma
to them the private key of a mid-level dirdoc.
- Control priviledges can be *revoked* by updating the parent dirdoc
so that it does not point to the dirdoc who's key was given away.
... and no Node changes required.
Let me know what you think.
--
Dev Random
Finger
might look like (the top
toolbar was added by the proxy).
The Adapter remembers CHKs and SVKs authored by the user. It will also
remember the private keys for SVKs. The user's key store is encrypted
and can be purged.
--
That's it. Sorry about using a pseudonym, but mailing lis
35 matches
Mail list logo
