On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Robert Hailey
wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> IMPLEMENTING IT:
> Main tasks:
> - Converting our datastore indexes into a compact, slightly more lossy,
> 1-bit
> filter. (Easy)
> - Creating a snapshot once an hour, and keeping for
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Robert Hailey rob...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
IMPLEMENTING IT:
Main tasks:
- Converting our datastore indexes into a compact, slightly more lossy,
1-bit
filter. (Easy)
- Creating a snapshot once an hour,
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Robert Hailey rob...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
[20:37:16] evanbd You standardize on a size for the bloom filters; say
1MiB.
Then, if your store has 100GB of data, and needs 18MiB of bloom filters,
you
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 22:43:50 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
Yes, that's a question worth considering. There are both performance
and security issues involved, I think
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009 00:53:27 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 22:43:50 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 3
the number of
copies inserted.
Toad didn't like this because it makes top blocks identifiable to
everyone on the routing path, and involves network-level changes. The
other approaches can be implemented at a higher level as a translation
before handing a normal CHK request to the network.
Evan Daniel
-level changes. The
other approaches can be implemented at a higher level as a translation
before handing a normal CHK request to the network.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
there any reason to make the first n-2 segments full size and the
last 2 balanced and potentially only (slightly over) half size, rather
than make all n segments the same size?
Evan Daniel
size.
Is there any reason to make the first n-2 segments full size and the
last 2 balanced and potentially only (slightly over) half size, rather
than make all n segments the same size?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>>
>> There is a technique that would make the store fill more quickly than
>> it currently does without any drawbacks (aside from a small amount of
>> develo
ores
the most expensive to recompute. There is a noticeable performance
improvement in the cache if you are willing to store a result in the
wrong slot when only one of the two is full already.
Evan Daniel
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009 20:55:59 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>> * Evan Daniel [2009-03-02 15:41:59]:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re
>> > wrote:
>> > > * Evan D
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 20:55:59 Florent Daignière wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-03-02 15:41:59]:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan
. There is a noticeable performance
improvement in the cache if you are willing to store a result in the
wrong slot when only one of the two is full already.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Oskar Sandberg os...@sandbergs.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a technique that would make the store fill more quickly than
it currently does without any drawbacks (aside from a small amount
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> * Evan Daniel [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
>> I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
>> without further testing.
[...]
> Tweaking that code based on one's experience is just plain silly.
T
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
without further testing.
[...]
Tweaking that code based on one's experience is just plain
ections, something like 1 connection per 2KiB/s of
outbound bandwidth, with a minimum of 15 and a max of 20. I'll
perform some testing with 15 connections, 30KiB/s limit and report
back on that.
Evan Daniel
, something like 1 connection per 2KiB/s of
outbound bandwidth, with a minimum of 15 and a max of 20. I'll
perform some testing with 15 connections, 30KiB/s limit and report
back on that.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
f the
wiki is important.
Thoughts?
Evan Daniel
is important.
Thoughts?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> * Evan Daniel [2008-09-01 22:35:07]:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Searching: Lots of users want searching, and are disappointed when they
>> > d
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Evan Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-01 22:35:07]:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching: Lots of users want searching, and are disappointed when they
don't
get
, the spider stalls with a
queue full or queries that neither complete nor fail.
Evan Daniel
, the spider stalls with a
queue full or queries that neither complete nor fail.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
nger any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>>
>
> Are the opensource jvm's up to 1.5? If so, I say go for it. :)
IIRC, there are no JVM changes, only compiler changes.
Evan Daniel
that there is no
longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
Are the opensource jvm's up to 1.5? If so, I say go for it. :)
IIRC, there are no JVM changes, only compiler changes.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi
one outside NIST know why. This can be good or bad, depends on the
>> conspiracy level.
>>
>> FYI, NIST once fixed a DES vulnerability before anybody else suspect
>> there was a weakness.
>>
>> The standard AES is not compatible to our Rijndael implementation
>> I guess it's not worth breaking the backward compatibility in 0.7.1.
>
> It might be if it's more secure...?
Unless I'm mistaken, the difference between Rijndael and AES relates
to things like specified block sizes and not the core crypto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijndael#Description_of_the_cipher
Evan Daniel
sizes and not the core crypto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijndael#Description_of_the_cipher
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Fix to plugins/build.xml to correctly specify paths, assuming normal
svn checkout of both plugins/ and freenet/
Evan Daniel
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 19885)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
-
-
+
+
Fix to plugins/build.xml to correctly specify paths, assuming normal
svn checkout of both plugins/ and freenet/
Evan Daniel
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 19885)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,8
hat do I care whether the 4 day
download delay is routing delay or bandwidth limit?
The major change needed would be a way to request not the specific SSK
block, but the SSK, whatever CHK it happens to redirect to, and any
CHK blocks needed to decode the result -- plus a way to prevent that
being a DoS attack (tit-for-tat?).
Evan Daniel
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Michael Rogers
wrote:
> Evan Daniel wrote:
>
> > I think flood routing inserts opportunistically is a good idea --
> > there's no point in sending out a memory card less than full, and
> > routed requests / inserts may well not be enough
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
I think flood routing inserts opportunistically is a good idea --
there's no point in sending out a memory card less than full, and
routed requests / inserts may well not be enough to fill
limit?
The major change needed would be a way to request not the specific SSK
block, but the SSK, whatever CHK it happens to redirect to, and any
CHK blocks needed to decode the result -- plus a way to prevent that
being a DoS attack (tit-for-tat?).
Evan Daniel
lso, in small communities where there's
strong motivation and short geographical distances, you may well find
the motivation sufficient to produce latencies of a couple hours, not
a day or so, at least in some cases.
I have visions of Neo from The Matrix, sitting in a darkened apartment
and act
data broker...
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Evan Daniel wrote:
> > At least for the near term future, and probably longer, we need an
> > answer other than TCP because of ugliness like Comcast's Sandvine
> > hardware. Forged TCP reset packets ar
consumer-level NATs are probably old devices that won't be
upgraded any time soon. Remember, we want to handle an average user's
NAT well, even if they can't / won't change the settings when Freenet
asks them to.
Evan Daniel
soon. Remember, we want to handle an average user's
NAT well, even if they can't / won't change the settings when Freenet
asks them to.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
At least for the near term future, and probably longer, we need an
answer other than TCP because of ugliness like Comcast's Sandvine
hardware. Forged TCP reset packets are non-trivial to deal
ely
two networks, especially if they result from cultural and language
barriers, to what extent will the two sides be uninterested in
communicating with each other? I think having a ballpark answer to
that question will go a long way in determining how big a problem this
really is, and also what sort of solutions might be appropriate. Of
course, it sounds hard to answer :)
Evan Daniel
On Feb 1, 2008 12:00 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>
> > On Jan 30, 2008 5:49 PM, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> >
> >> You also need an escape-route mechanism - a way to find an entrance
> >> in
On Feb 1, 2008 12:00 PM, Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 5:49 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also need an escape-route mechanism - a way to find an entrance
into
another network once regular
think having a ballpark answer to
that question will go a long way in determining how big a problem this
really is, and also what sort of solutions might be appropriate. Of
course, it sounds hard to answer :)
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
quests for non-existant data?
Evan Daniel
On 9/5/06, Michael Rogers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > We will be using STS, at least initially. Which means checking a
> > signature.
>
> Cool, IANAC but I think we should be OK.
As long as we're signing the data, not its hash; in
On 9/5/06, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
We will be using STS, at least initially. Which means checking a
signature.
Cool, IANAC but I think we should be OK.
As long as we're signing the data, not its hash; in
On 8/25/06, Michael Rogers wrote:
> * Can reputations be negative as well as positive?
>
> * If reputations can be negative, how do you prevent nodes from
> generating new identities to escape bad reputations (whitewashing)?
>
> * If reputations can only be positive, do new nodes start with a
On 8/25/06, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Can reputations be negative as well as positive?
* If reputations can be negative, how do you prevent nodes from
generating new identities to escape bad reputations (whitewashing)?
* If reputations can only be positive, do new nodes start
On 8/17/06, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17 Aug 2006, at 09:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> I don't believe that the darknet and opennet will be weakly connected
> as you suggest, but neither of us can no for sure until we see
On 8/17/06, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 Aug 2006, at 09:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
I don't believe that the darknet and opennet will be weakly connected
as you suggest, but neither of us can no for sure until we
On 8/15/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Because in many cases the network we provide it with is not a single
> small world network (which is what it is designed for), but two loosely
> connected small world networks of different parameters.
It seems likely to me that interest in content will
On 8/15/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because in many cases the network we provide it with is not a single
small world network (which is what it is designed for), but two loosely
connected small world networks of different parameters.
It seems likely to me that interest in
opology than the current
mess of people connecting to random nodes, even if it only meant that
each person connected to a couple random nodes and a couple of their
immediate neighbors, no?
Anyway, the goal is to improve things, not to hold out for perfection,
and this seems likely to improve on the status quo.
I would also advocate highly visible security warnings about it.
Evan Daniel
out for perfection,
and this seems likely to improve on the status quo.
I would also advocate highly visible security warnings about it.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis wrote:
> Hrmm..
>
> For one, keep in mind that these names are for the User's beneifit, not
> the node's... In reality, "Charles"'s nodelist is a unique USK, at
> USK at XCVNDFJGGSSDGSDG...
>
> So that means that the User might get confused, but the node knows the
>
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis wrote:
> Juiceman wrote:
> > What if 2 or more lists have the same user-friendly name but have them
> > pointing to different keys? How would this be handled?
> >
> Keep in mind, unless it's from your list, you don't access Key.. You
> access "Username\Key", where
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juiceman wrote:
What if 2 or more lists have the same user-friendly name but have them
pointing to different keys? How would this be handled?
Keep in mind, unless it's from your list, you don't access Key.. You
access Username\Key, where
On 6/18/06, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrmm..
For one, keep in mind that these names are for the User's beneifit, not
the node's... In reality, Charles's nodelist is a unique USK, at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So that means that the User might get confused, but the node knows the
difference
arge security improvement over
0.5 (mostly from no harvesting; an attacker would have to do real work
to find people). If I was worried about my annonymity in a more than
passing way I'd do what I suggested above.
Good luck!
Evan Daniel
PS send me a noderef and I'll connect with you! You can trust me, I promise ;)
real work
to find people). If I was worried about my annonymity in a more than
passing way I'd do what I suggested above.
Good luck!
Evan Daniel
PS send me a noderef and I'll connect with you! You can trust me, I promise ;)
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
Does Freenet report its bandwidth usage?
I show 10-20KB/s usage, with a bandwidth setting of 100K.
It would be interesting to know the bandwidth settings of the nodes
I'm connected to...
Evan
On 4/6/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Is your 0.7 node consistently using less bandwidth than it
Does Freenet report its bandwidth usage?
I show 10-20KB/s usage, with a bandwidth setting of 100K.
It would be interesting to know the bandwidth settings of the nodes
I'm connected to...
Evan
On 4/6/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is your 0.7 node consistently using less
Is there an overview of the 0.7 routing architecture online somewhere?
I'm curious as to how it compares to previous routing schemes Freenet
has used.
Thanks!
Evan Daniel
Is there an overview of the 0.7 routing architecture online somewhere?
I'm curious as to how it compares to previous routing schemes Freenet
has used.
Thanks!
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi
501 - 566 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
