Re: Racist statement of Ian Clarke on this list

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:34:51PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > Thank you, Hakimi :) > > I don't think anyone in this thread seriously thinks I'm a racist. There is > just a certain type of person who thinks they can get what they want by > throwing false accusations. > > These people are toxic and

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:19:34PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > In practice what you can do with Bitcoin script is severely restricted > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 04/02/16 20:32, Ian Clarke wrote: > > I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts > > , and I'm surprised by the > > similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the origi

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:36:34PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Basically the security model is now an attacker has to outspend the > > defenders in terms of Bitcoins sacrificed. Not perfect, but it may be of > > value, especially in conjunction with other protections. They do have > > potent

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:18:32PM -0500, Robert Hailey wrote: > Judging from a business-process perspective, if it were up to me (and it's > not!) I would elect to do these two options. > > Direct paypal > for those that want it now (and they likely have a paypal account). I > presume this

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:22:10PM -0600, Timm Murray wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 13:47, Peter Todd wrote: > > I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be > > accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a > > ipv6 addr

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a ipv6 address attached to it as well as ipv4 and from the looks of it my node automatically bound itself to both. The nodes are: gw.petertodd.ca and gw.rjfleck.c

Re: [freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:22:10PM -0600, Timm Murray wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 13:47, Peter Todd wrote: > > I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be > > accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a > > ipv6 addr

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a ipv6 address attached to it as well as ipv4 and from the looks of it my node automatically bound itself to both. The nodes are: gw.petertodd.ca and gw.rjfleck.c

[freenet-dev] CPU Eating & other things (bugs?)

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:31:54AM +1100, fish wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Um, I'm quite amazed that you can run fred on that _on a good, > > non-overloaded day_ :). > > Hey, I run my node on a p2-233, at the moment! (I, of coursae, havn't > upgraded since 5.0.

Re: [freenet-dev] CPU Eating & other things (bugs?)

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:31:54AM +1100, fish wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Um, I'm quite amazed that you can run fred on that _on a good, > > non-overloaded day_ :). > > Hey, I run my node on a p2-233, at the moment! (I, of coursae, havn't > upgraded since 5.0.

Re: [freenet-dev] DS taking longer to load.

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:57:34AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: > >They have support yes, but how do you delete part of a file after you > >don't need a section of data anymore? > > NT has an ioctl that zeroes out a range of bytes, and deallocates file space > as appropriate. I'm told linux do

Re: [freenet-dev] DS taking longer to load.

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:27:12PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote: > > does linux have equivalent functionality, or was the freenet 3 style > > big directory datastore not a problem there anyway? > > > > All the popular linux filesystems do efficient sparse files, IIRC. As > for java support, no cl

[freenet-devl] 24 CARAT GOLD PLATED DEITIES .......

On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:00:47AM +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > Peter! I thought you'd left since we hadn't heard anything > from you for so long. Nah, just been very busy with school and work and to be interested in freenet stuff. > Also, does anyone know what ever happened to Mr. Bad? Beats m

[freenet-devl] Freenet 0.3 dead

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:48:53PM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Hi, > > fisrt, sorry if this is a stupid question. > > Today I had major trouble connetting to Freenet 0.3 > from my node and a couple of Italian gateway. > > gpl.txt is requestable, but all of freesites listed > in the gatew

Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet 0.3 dead

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:48:53PM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Hi, > > fisrt, sorry if this is a stupid question. > > Today I had major trouble connetting to Freenet 0.3 > from my node and a couple of Italian gateway. > > gpl.txt is requestable, but all of freesites listed > in the gate

[freenet-devl] New Website Design

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:40:44AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: > > > I must be more tired than I thought.. emailing shouldn't be this > > difficult ;) > > > > http://buttsnot.com/freenetrough.gif > > I think this site looks really cool. I'm still amazed you can do design like that with html. :)

Re: [freenet-devl] New Website Design

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:40:44AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: > > > I must be more tired than I thought.. emailing shouldn't be this > > difficult ;) > > > > http://buttsnot.com/freenetrough.gif > > I think this site looks really cool. I'm still amazed you can do design like that with html. :

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:33:21AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > And how the fuck does "one reference per node" help against a malicious > > attacker? Nothing stops them from making up a new node identity with > > every reply. > > A

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:33:21AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > And how the fuck does "one reference per node" help against a malicious > > attacker? Nothing stops them from making up a new node identity with > > every reply. > > A

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references in

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references in

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references i

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references i

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

[freenet-devl] attack against publisher anonymity

On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: > I'm not quite certian if this attack would work at all, but we were > discussing a while back that caching might be changed to a probablistic > meathod (like there is a 1/3 chance your node won't cache a file). This > would include the

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

From what I can see right now we're pretty safe from mappers. Since the number of possible connections increases exponentially and the maximum mapping speed increases linearly (each node only allows x incomming connections) so long as the network is big it will be impossible to map. I'm going to

Re: [freenet-devl] attack against publisher anonymity

On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: > I'm not quite certian if this attack would work at all, but we were > discussing a while back that caching might be changed to a probablistic > meathod (like there is a 1/3 chance your node won't cache a file). This > would include th

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:24:44PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > > Ok, I give up. What does it actually do? Well using repeated inserts and requests fnmap attempts to figure out what nodes are "close" to each other in terms of HTL. That information is then fed to GraphViz and displayed. -- Nee

Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:24:44PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > > Ok, I give up. What does it actually do? Well using repeated inserts and requests fnmap attempts to figure out what nodes are "close" to each other in terms of HTL. That information is then fed to GraphViz and displayed. -- Ne

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

I just got a half-decent image out of my mapper. I've been running it for the past 24 hours or so. I'm still not done on the mapping, still have another 8000 connections (out of 13000) to go but it should give you some idea of what it can do. In any case I'm redoing the archetecture to make it more

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

I just got a half-decent image out of my mapper. I've been running it for the past 24 hours or so. I'm still not done on the mapping, still have another 8000 connections (out of 13000) to go but it should give you some idea of what it can do. In any case I'm redoing the archetecture to make it mor

[freenet-devl] First freenet map

Here's a crude little map of 20 Freenet nodes that I just did up using the GraphViz Perl module. All inserts were done with a htl of 5 The average request htl is shown on the edges between nodes. The map needs more nodes in it obviously, only a few had any connections at all to other nodes and when

[freenet-devl] First freenet map

Here's a crude little map of 20 Freenet nodes that I just did up using the GraphViz Perl module. All inserts were done with a htl of 5 The average request htl is shown on the edges between nodes. The map needs more nodes in it obviously, only a few had any connections at all to other nodes and whe

[freenet-devl] Holy sh1t

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donations > > Make sure you are sitting down, and check the recent amonymous donations > near the bottom of the page. > > I have emailed this guy to make sure his donation was intentional. Yah!

Re: [freenet-devl] Holy sh1t

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donations > > Make sure you are sitting down, and check the recent amonymous donations > near the bottom of the page. > > I have emailed this guy to make sure his donation was intentional. Yah

[freenet-devl] Freeweb comments

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget > the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if > someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free? > The best way to pre

Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget > the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if > someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free? > The best way to pr

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > I've recompiled the lot. First thing I tested was binary > > compatibility, found that it was non-existant, so ran make clean ; > > make > > Hm. I can't reproduce the problem. There is a bug that will cause > datasource to be rand

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > I've recompiled the lot. First thing I tested was binary > > compatibility, found that it was non-existant, so ran make clean ; > > make > > Hm. I can't reproduce the problem. There is a bug that will cause > datasource to be ran

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:51:01PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Now for bug time. :) The datasource variable just got broken. :( > > Returns pure binary junk. > > Hm. Are you sure you've recompiled all of your code? That sounds > like a likely stale-object problem. If that doesn't fix it, I'l

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:37:07PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd writes: > > > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:02:38AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

or topical use only. Do not ingest. > > Changes since 0.3.0:* Switched to ints for port numbers. > * Switched to dynamic allocation of hash handles in > the generate_hashes_ functions (thanks Peter Todd) > *

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:51:01PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Now for bug time. :) The datasource variable just got broken. :( > > Returns pure binary junk. > > Hm. Are you sure you've recompiled all of your code? That sounds > like a likely stale-object problem. If that doesn't fix it, I'

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:37:07PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:02:38AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > > * Added freenet_close_connection() > > > > It would be

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

al use only. Do not ingest. > > Changes since 0.3.0:* Switched to ints for port numbers. > * Switched to dynamic allocation of hash handles in > the generate_hashes_ functions (thanks Peter Todd) > * Added

[freenet-devl] datasource

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 04:06:18PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd writes: > > > Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a > > StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it > > comes before but I just want to be sure. >

[freenet-devl] datasource

Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it comes before but I just want to be sure. -- Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Resume at http://retep.tripod.com

[freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:34:03PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > As many of you will be aware, several months ago we set up a non-profit > corporation called "Freenet Project Inc", the intention of which is to > support the development of Freenet (note that this is unrelated to > Uprizer Inc). We also

Re: [freenet-devl] datasource

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 04:06:18PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a > > StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it > > comes before but I j

[freenet-devl] datasource

Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it comes before but I just want to be sure. -- Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Resume at http://retep.tripod.co

Re: [freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:34:03PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > As many of you will be aware, several months ago we set up a non-profit > corporation called "Freenet Project Inc", the intention of which is to > support the development of Freenet (note that this is unrelated to > Uprizer Inc). We als

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

Just a note... I really am working on that Freenet Mapping program. I'm currently implementing basic functions that the mapping will build on, threading functions, disk-io etc. I don't think the whole thing is going to work in the end though. The n^2 cost of a full map and the heisenburg weirdness

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

Just a note... I really am working on that Freenet Mapping program. I'm currently implementing basic functions that the mapping will build on, threading functions, disk-io etc. I don't think the whole thing is going to work in the end though. The n^2 cost of a full map and the heisenburg weirdnes

[freenet-devl] log analyzer authors beware of 0.4

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > I have also been thinking about how logging could be enhanced further. > One idea I had was to have a "dump log" facility, where the last 10 > messages of each debugging level are outputted, and could form part of a > bug report. This w

Re: [freenet-devl] log analyzer authors beware of 0.4

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > I have also been thinking about how logging could be enhanced further. > One idea I had was to have a "dump log" facility, where the last 10 > messages of each debugging level are outputted, and could form part of a > bug report. This

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > The way to filter a whitelist is to subscribe by sending your public key > and some kind of credentials (not think cash) and then filter messages > which are not signed by a known public key. Filtering really isn't good enough. Though the

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > The way to filter a whitelist is to subscribe by sending your public key > and some kind of credentials (not think cash) and then filter messages > which are not signed by a known public key. Filtering really isn't good enough. Though the

[freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:53:01PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:36:16PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > > >

[freenet-devl] YAEFNIIC

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but Whiterose is always one version ahead, anyways. The point of > > > Whiterose is not to maintain Fred compatibility, but to be an endless > > > construction job. > > > > Perhaps Adam is actually a Doozer? (of "F

[freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > 2) Change InsertClient so that it will do the equivalent of > >freenetmirror or PutFiles if the local file is a directory. > > I actually think that we sh

Re: [freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:53:01PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:36:16PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > > >

Re: [freenet-devl] YAEFNIIC

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but Whiterose is always one version ahead, anyways. The point of > > > Whiterose is not to maintain Fred compatibility, but to be an endless > > > construction job. > > > > Perhaps Adam is actually a Doozer? (of "

Re: [freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > 2) Change InsertClient so that it will do the equivalent of > >freenetmirror or PutFiles if the local file is a directory. > > I actually think that we s

[freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote: > er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the > encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense, > recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to > do it th

Re: [freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote: > er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the > encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense, > recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to > do it t

[freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:12:04AM -0700, Don Marti wrote: > begin thelema quotation of Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0500: > > > Lesser ability to deny is not really a problem. If someone's > > downloading illegal files off freenet, the cops are going to find the

[freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > > "DM" == Don Marti writes: > > DM> If you want deniability, I think you pretty much have to take > DM> Peter's suggestion and don't cache anything requested by a > DM> local client -- don't just blame split files. >

Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > > "DM" == Don Marti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DM> If you want deniability, I think you pretty much have to take > DM> Peter's suggestion and don't cache anything requested by a > DM> local client -- don't just blame

Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:12:04AM -0700, Don Marti wrote: > begin thelema quotation of Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0500: > > > Lesser ability to deny is not really a problem. If someone's > > downloading illegal files off freenet, the cops are going to find the > > illegal data in their fi

[freenet-devl] modification proposal for specific issues (name space and update issues)

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Unfortunately you didn't do a very good job. You have basically reinvented > a functionality we have had since last summer. I don't quite see how you > could have spent any time at all reading about or using Freenet without > running

Re: [freenet-devl] modification proposal for specific issues (name space and update issues)

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Unfortunately you didn't do a very good job. You have basically reinvented > a functionality we have had since last summer. I don't quite see how you > could have spent any time at all reading about or using Freenet without > runnin

[freenet-devl] Risks of large key indexes

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:12:47PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > Break up the data into shares that have to be combined in order to > recover the original. Distribute the shares in the system. > This way no node contains data that is useful/incriminating all > by itself. Doing that makes things wors

[freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: > Are you concerned that the future of Freenet might be jeapordized > by people (mistakenly or otherwise) associating it with pornography? > I imagine the content seen on Freenet accurately reflects the > interests of its users. Sho

Re: [freenet-devl] Risks of large key indexes

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:12:47PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > Break up the data into shares that have to be combined in order to > recover the original. Distribute the shares in the system. > This way no node contains data that is useful/incriminating all > by itself. Doing that makes things wor

Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: > Are you concerned that the future of Freenet might be jeapordized > by people (mistakenly or otherwise) associating it with pornography? > I imagine the content seen on Freenet accurately reflects the > interests of its users. Sh

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:22:20PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 16 Apr 2001 22:33:46 -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > > In a mature Freenet network all nodes will be at full > > capacity. Where's this data gonna go? > > > > then it gets deleted. but mayb

[freenet-devl] Think Cash based anonymous submission prototype.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:18:00PM +0100, Matthew Burnham wrote: > In Computer Vision, the majority of the time, greyscale images are used for > analysis, so perhaps a colour image 'set' to convert to a 'horrible mess' > when converted to greyscale would be an idea (I guess if digits alternate in >

Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:22:20PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 16 Apr 2001 22:33:46 -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > > In a mature Freenet network all nodes will be at full > > capacity. Where's this data gonna go? > > > > then it gets deleted. but mayb

Re: [freenet-devl] Think Cash based anonymous submission prototype.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:18:00PM +0100, Matthew Burnham wrote: > In Computer Vision, the majority of the time, greyscale images are used for > analysis, so perhaps a colour image 'set' to convert to a 'horrible mess' > when converted to greyscale would be an idea (I guess if digits alternate in

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:23:11PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 17 Apr 2001 02:14:15 +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > If you are not going to delete data in that situation - > > what are you going to do with it? > > > > My problem with this philosophy is that it is misleading. If I have a

[freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:14:15AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > If all he was proposing was a different way of weighing objects in the > DataStore (I gave his mail an honest attempt and understood nothing) then > why all the ranting and attacking (luddites etc)? Nobody has ever argued > that ther

[freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:44:54PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > Anyone want to tell me what the hell is going on here? We regularly get posts from clueless newbies saying we need permanent files and also saying they've figured out a way to do them. They have been consistantly wrong. We're just a

Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:23:11PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 17 Apr 2001 02:14:15 +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > If you are not going to delete data in that situation - > > what are you going to do with it? > > > > My problem with this philosophy is that it is misleading. If I have

Re: [freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:26:55PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > >>>>> "PT" == Peter Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PT> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +, Adrian Lopez wrote: > >> It seems like various people here would rather

Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:14:15AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > If all he was proposing was a different way of weighing objects in the > DataStore (I gave his mail an honest attempt and understood nothing) then > why all the ranting and attacking (luddites etc)? Nobody has ever argued > that the

Re: [freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +, Adrian Lopez wrote: > It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd > like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in > lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without > KSKs? How would

Re: [freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:44:54PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > Anyone want to tell me what the hell is going on here? We regularly get posts from clueless newbies saying we need permanent files and also saying they've figured out a way to do them. They have been consistantly wrong. We're just

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Another day perhaps, but as of now you can end your little crusade, it > > won't get you anywhere. > > Spoken like a true arch-villian. ;) I still think he needs

[freenet-devl] Bootstrapping with Keyindexes

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:39:09AM -0700, John George wrote: > Now that keyindexes exist in Freenet, couldn't they be used to take the > place of the website running "inform.php" in the bootstrapping process? > > I was thinking that "fn_boot" keyindex could be brought on-line in > addition to the

[freenet-devl] I need a few 'FreeGate's

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:27:42PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm doing some tests on key visibility, and need to use a couple of > 'FreeGate's. > (What's a FreeGate?) > A FreeGate is a Freenet node which is configured to allow FProxy connections > from outside, to use the system

[freenet-devl] Push hard or Suck hard?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:51:06AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > I've got a dilemna with client design: > > I've seen lots of cases where newer inserted keys can't be found by others > unless they use ridiculously high HTLs. > > Which brings me to a question: > In order for a client to be useful,

Re: [freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Another day perhaps, but as of now you can end your little crusade, it > > won't get you anywhere. > > Spoken like a true arch-villian. ;) I still think he needs

Re: [freenet-devl] Bootstrapping with Keyindexes

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:39:09AM -0700, John George wrote: > Now that keyindexes exist in Freenet, couldn't they be used to take the > place of the website running "inform.php" in the bootstrapping process? > > I was thinking that "fn_boot" keyindex could be brought on-line in > addition to th

Re: [freenet-devl] I need a few 'FreeGate's

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:27:42PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm doing some tests on key visibility, and need to use a couple of 'FreeGate's. > (What's a FreeGate?) > A FreeGate is a Freenet node which is configured to allow FProxy connections from >outside, to use the system as

Re: [freenet-devl] Push hard or Suck hard?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:51:06AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > I've got a dilemna with client design: > > I've seen lots of cases where newer inserted keys can't be found by others unless >they use ridiculously high HTLs. > > Which brings me to a question: > In order for a client to be useful,

[freenet-devl] Snarfoo down?

Re: [freenet-devl] Snarfoo down?

On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:18:42PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > I can't get to Snarfoo - anyone else notice this? Not over here, though I only managed to get it 5 minutes ago. How 'bout ya start up your own site you for once you can be right when you ask if the site's down? :) -- GCS d s+:-- a--

  1   2   >