Re: [freenet-dev] New wiki

2010-01-04 Thread bbackde
We again exchanged 11 mails about a finished task :) And you took the opportunity to flame against sf.net because Ximin accidentally provided the https link, which was surely not intended by the sf.net guys. But hey, I should not have written this now, its the 12th mail ;) On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at

Re: [freenet-dev] New wiki

2010-01-04 Thread bbackde
With a grade in computer science, I know that you don't just expected to enter some openid and get entrance. Of course you already checked the openid trouble page (http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/OpenID) and checked if your openid is supported. If you did all of this, then you fou

[freenet-dev] WoT+Freetalk

2009-11-28 Thread bbackde
Seems like we have a greater audience these days caused by this article in the Guardian. Would it be a good idea to release the latest versions of WoT+Freetalk now? Does the currently released WoT work correctly? -- __ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keys

Re: [freenet-dev] [Wot] Recent WoT changes code review/brief testing

2009-11-26 Thread bbackde
Finished the requested l10n fixes. > Check that Web of Trust menu title is correctly localised. Checked and it works as expected. Any doubts, or did I miss something special? On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 21:06, wrote: > Sorry, I saw no change on github at the time when I wrote this mail :) > > > O

Re: [freenet-dev] [Wot] Recent WoT changes code review/brief testing

2009-11-26 Thread bbackde
Sorry, I saw no change on github at the time when I wrote this mail :) On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 20:36, Artefact2 wrote: > Yeah, I did. > What did you expect me to solve when I said "I'm on it" ? :D > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:14 PM, wrote: >> >> Great. Will you also check the sort by nickname

Re: [freenet-dev] [Wot] Recent WoT changes code review/brief testing

2009-11-26 Thread bbackde
Great. Will you also check the sort by nickname problem? Would be nice, you implemented it, right? On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 19:48, Artefact2 wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Artefact2 wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:18 PM, wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for your review. >>> >>> I h

Re: [freenet-dev] [Wot] Recent WoT changes code review/brief testing

2009-11-26 Thread bbackde
Thanks for your review. I hope Artefact2 will address this one: > Testing: > Why does the color coding apply to 2 columns in some cases and 1 column in > others? > > Sort by doesn't work - it goes back to the page asking me to select the trust > tree owner. Xor will address this one: > - return

Re: [freenet-dev] Using l10n node interface

2009-11-15 Thread bbackde
Great, thanks.We'll wait for this great feature then. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:55, Artefact2 wrote: > Well right now nothing needs to be changed in FredPluginBaseL10n, only the > translation toadlet has > to be updated to support fetching l10n infos from the loaded plugins that > implement Fred

Re: [freenet-dev] Making the Web of Trust plugin user friendly and useful

2009-11-14 Thread bbackde
And I am not sure if xor knows what to do from the above ideas. Lets see what he adapts and what changes then. Currently I do only the easy work like l10n support ;) On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 22:37, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 14 November 2009 16:47:27 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: >> Gre

Re: [freenet-dev] Using l10n node interface

2009-11-14 Thread bbackde
Is it possible to integrate the l10n support of plugins into the nodes translation facility so users can translate the plugin strings? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:36, wrote: > Thanks, will check this out. > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:34, Artefact2 wrote: >> I did implement PluginL10n especiall

Re: [freenet-dev] Making the Web of Trust plugin user friendly and useful

2009-11-14 Thread bbackde
Great ideas from Toad and you. But there is one big problem: we are quite late in the development cycle. We wanted to finish a working version till Christmas. Your new ideas would mean to make a big step backward and start another design from scratch (however, there isn't no design yet for the new

Re: [freenet-dev] Using l10n node interface

2009-11-12 Thread bbackde
Thanks, will check this out. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:34, Artefact2 wrote: > I did implement PluginL10n especially for that. You should use it, it's > *really* easy :) > If you want example code, well > check http://github.com/freenet/plugin-FlogHelper-staging > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:56 P

[freenet-dev] Using l10n node interface

2009-11-12 Thread bbackde
Work on WoT/Freetalk proceeds, now I wanted to look into the translation issue. Can someone (Toad?) please have a look onto bug 0003352? A simple example or even a pointer to some node code would be very helpful. Thanks! -- __ GnuPG key: (0x48DB

[freenet-dev] Fwd: Git Problem

2009-11-11 Thread bbackde
I think I accidentally fixed the problem with the help found on some websites ^^ Hope this is ok now. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:41 Subject: Git Problem To: Discussion of development issues Sorry folks, my first steps with Github. Checked out

[freenet-dev] Git Problem

2009-11-11 Thread bbackde
Sorry folks, my first steps with Github. Checked out the source, changed one file and somehow managed to commit it. See here: http://github.com/freenet/plugin-Freetalk-staging/commit/d6998ad17063f49279f82d37a4ac61528c9b7fab Unfortunately this is recognized as a full source replace. What happened,

Re: [freenet-dev] Reading PersistentPut and PersistentGet problem

2009-08-27 Thread bbackde
You should process the messages in a Thread. Put your code into a Thread that calls handler methods when a specific message arrived. The Thread runs forever and receives all messages and all data... On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:22, Michael Yip wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does anyone know how to know when

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

2009-06-04 Thread bbackde
If you really consider sf.net, someone should analyse what they provide. And you should clearly state what you need. The whole discussion is based on assumptions and stuff. Fyi: sf.net has an own donation system, but you don't have to use it. The Frost project directly links to paypal on its (sf.n

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1213, 1214

2009-06-01 Thread bbackde
I like the 1214 menu much more than the 1213 one. With 1213 I had to do alot of clicks any time I wanted to navigate to a submenu, now its much easier. Inserts work now, except a ~200MB file which now gives me error reason 'InsertException.shortError.0' after it failed at 97%. But I tried it only

Re: [freenet-dev] Why WoTs won't work....

2009-05-22 Thread bbackde
Is'nt his point that the users just won't maintain the trust lists? I thought that is the problem that he meant how can Advogato help us here? On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:51, Evan Daniel wrote: > It's not all that interesting.  It has been discussed to death many > times.  The Advogato algorit

Re: [freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

2009-04-30 Thread bbackde
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 20:18, wrote: >> Be warned that if you use the puttygen program to create your keypair >> you probably need to reformat the .pub file before uploading. > > Can you please tell me more about   reformat the .pub file before uploading. Solved this one with the help of http:/

Re: [freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

2009-04-30 Thread bbackde
I followed all instructions, but now I constantly get an "Auth fail" error when the git plugin tries to retrieve the list of available branches. I don't even know how the plugin should know about my ssh key location. It never asked me, and there is no config option. 2009/4/29 xor : > On Tuesday 2

Re: [freenet-dev] CMKs don't work, but there are other options was Re: Easy top block duplication: Content Multiplication Keys

2009-04-29 Thread bbackde
Could a client keep the top block available by requesting it lets say once per day? When the MaxSize option is used this could be a cheap request. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:03, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Argh, no, this doesn't work, because the pubkey is known, and there is no way > for the node

Re: [freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

2009-04-29 Thread bbackde
> Be warned that if you use the puttygen program to create your keypair > you probably need to reformat the .pub file before uploading. Can you please tell me more about reformat the .pub file before uploading. ;) On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 13:44, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Tuesday 28 April 2009 0

Re: [freenet-dev] SVN repository archive

2009-04-29 Thread bbackde
Started all 4 together, got the big one in 1 hour 5 minutes. .sig and .sha256 took 1 minute, and .sha1 took 25 minutes. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 15:10, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Please fetch and archive the following files, anyone who can. This is the SVN > repository dump at the time of the migra

Re: [freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

2009-04-29 Thread bbackde
I have no problem with commits and updates from the command line. But when it comes to compare tasks (what was changed, what did I change compared to the HEAD, or to any other revision), then I really prefer Eclipse. If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using my prefered

Re: [freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

2009-04-27 Thread bbackde
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:08, Daniel Cheng wrote: > Okay, after reading the irc log, i guess i know what's happending here. > > You have to generate a ssh-key using   `ssh-keygen` and upload your > *.pub file to your github account. It seems as I will run into some trouble because I use Windows

Re: [freenet-dev] CMKs don't work, but there are other options was Re: Easy top block duplication: Content Multiplication Keys

2009-04-23 Thread bbackde
Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are static and all inserts produces the same key. Will the CHK keys have a fix length? On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:06, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:14:01 guido wrote: >> Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb

[freenet-dev] Invalid number format

2009-04-04 Thread bbackde
I configured port 9000 as FProxy-Port. In the config page the value for FProxy-Port is now shown as "9k". Seems as if a wrong number format is used. -- __ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A5

Re: [freenet-dev] Freetalk specificaton

2009-03-25 Thread bbackde
Doh, by mistake I answered to the list instead to xor only... Sorry. 2009/3/26 Matthew Toseland : > Please speak english on the devl list. Thank you. > > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 17:53:12 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: >> Hey, >> >> ich hab mir mal die Specs angeschaut, soweit so gut. Leider wei

Re: [freenet-dev] Freetalk specificaton

2009-03-25 Thread bbackde
Hey, ich hab mir mal die Specs angeschaut, soweit so gut. Leider weiss ich jetzt auch nicht viel mehr ;) Wegen eines FCP Interfaces wäre es genial wenn DU einmal einen Proseentwurf von geeigneten FCP Messages machen könntest. Du weisst ja was Frost so macht, was wäreen denn sinnvolle Messages um

[freenet-dev] Fwd: current.fcp.assumeDownloadDDAIsAllowed=true

2009-03-16 Thread bbackde
Never mind, found the problem and now trying to figure out what the values mean... -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 17:13 Subject: current.fcp.assumeDownloadDDAIsAllowed=true To: Discussion of development issues Hello, I want to change Frost to implem

[freenet-dev] current.fcp.assumeDownloadDDAIsAllowed=true

2009-03-16 Thread bbackde
Hello, I want to change Frost to implement TestDDA correctly. Before issuing TestDDA messages I want to check if the node configuration allows DDA in general. I think I have to check for current.fcp.assumeUploadDDAIsAllowed=true current.node.uploadAllowedDirs=all current.node.downloadAllowedD

Re: [freenet-dev] New Windows update script, please commit

2009-01-20 Thread bbackde
Interesting, my friend still runs 1202 :) And no, I really did'nt kill the script. I will observe what happens the next time and let you know. Thanks for your work. On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:55, Juiceman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:02 PM, wrote: >> I run 1201 and saw that a peer runs

Re: [freenet-dev] New Windows update script, please commit

2009-01-20 Thread bbackde
I run 1201 and saw that a peer runs 1202. Started update.cmd, but it left me with a 0-byte freenet.jar file :( Even after I ran update.cmd several times it thought I have the latest version... Renamed existing freenet.jar.new to freenet.jar, and 1201 works again. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:18, Ju

Re: [freenet-dev] Vista issues

2009-01-19 Thread bbackde
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:40, Juiceman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Zero3 wrote: >> bbackde has been kind enough to test various stuff for me on Vista. >> Basically, 2 important things are b0rked

Re: [freenet-dev] Native Windows installer preview and questions

2009-01-13 Thread bbackde
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 19:43, Zero3 wrote: > bbac...@googlemail.com skrev: >> I have Vista running, a german and an english version (both 64 bit). >> So I could test something if needed. >> (my production node runs on 32-bit XP). >> > > Cool! Are you able to run Freenet and other 32-bit executabl

Re: [freenet-dev] Native Windows installer preview and questions

2009-01-13 Thread bbackde
I have Vista running, a german and an english version (both 64 bit). So I could test something if needed. (my production node runs on 32-bit XP). On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 19:01, Juiceman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Zero3 wrote:

Re: [freenet-dev] Laptops still suck was Re: Installation -

2008-11-25 Thread bbackde
It saves energy and noise and space to run a laptop 24/7 instead of running a big desktop. Current laptops are fast and have alot of ram. So don't say laptops are bad in general. They are bad when they don't run 24/7. On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 17:15, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1178 (and 1176, 1177)

2008-11-14 Thread bbackde
Lol, just used update.cmd to get the new version fast, but it looped downlading the same jar again and again without any messages (file grows up to 2,8 MB, then back to 0 bytes, grows again and so on). I cancelled the script when the file was at maximum size, and it was not broken. Started it, and

Re: [freenet-dev] State of the Freenet, and tentative roadmap

2008-11-14 Thread bbackde
I may have miss it, but: - will Freetalk be compatible with FMS? - what about the WoT node plugin, will it be usable from external apps also? Thanks. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 19:52, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CHANGES SINCE 0.7 > > Lots of work has been done on Freenet since 0.7

Re: [freenet-dev] salted datastore

2008-11-05 Thread bbackde
Will the current store be converted automatically? On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:17, Florent Daignière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's time for the salted-datastore to be the default option. > > Sdiz, do you object to it? > > NextGen$ > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9

Re: [freenet-dev] fproxy hanging

2008-06-17 Thread bbackde
'Normal' people like me usually get the answer: file a bug and attach the docs. Whatever...don't care about me. None does. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:06, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any time. > > Ian. > > (What? Its not like IRC, you don't have to read it if you don't want to) > > On

Re: [freenet-dev] fproxy hanging

2008-06-17 Thread bbackde
Thanks for sending your whole dump to the discussion group *g* ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] git-over-fproxy

2008-06-05 Thread bbackde
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:38 PM, David 'Bombe' Roden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 17:41:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Btw: I gave two reasons for my recommendation of mercurial, but David >> just ignored them. > > Yes, I did. And why? Because > > a) the SCM I use for my p

Re: [freenet-dev] git-over-fproxy

2008-06-05 Thread bbackde
Ok. Finally there is some constructive discussion. Great. On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One final word to this: I don't wanted to start a flamewar, I wanted >> to point out that >> one could

Re: [freenet-dev] git-over-fproxy

2008-06-05 Thread bbackde
One final word to this: I don't wanted to start a flamewar, I wanted to point out that one could concentrate on a system that works well on all platforms. This is not true for git. But ok, go on and do it at least for the Linux users... Btw: I gave two reasons for my recommendation of mercurial,

Re: [freenet-dev] git-over-fproxy

2008-06-05 Thread bbackde
Why git, why not mercurial (better multi-platform support than git, same or more features)? (maybe you read the article about mercurial in the latest c't?) On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:49 AM, David 'Bombe' Roden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, everyone. > > I tried to get git over fproxy working l

Re: [freenet-dev] More on Perst was Re: New database for Freenet: db4o

2008-05-20 Thread bbackde
Uh? You have to mark in-memory objects as unused to get rid of them? On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 19 May 2008 15:24, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Monday 19 May 2008 14:47, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > On Monday 19 May 2008 11:34, Matthew

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

2008-05-18 Thread bbackde
I know I repeat myself, but if you consider db4o you should also consider perst as an option. Toad, can you do your 'disk full test' with perst to compare it against db4o? Perst and db4o seem to provide the same things. But according to http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/perstbench.html perst is much

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

2008-05-17 Thread bbackde
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Julien Cornuwel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been reading DB4O's whitepaper (mentionned in Toad's post) and I'm > wondering if I could use it for the WoT plugin. I could get rid of Derby > and it would make the deployment simpler if db4o is shipped with freenet

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin

2008-05-12 Thread bbackde
When you publish a shared trust tree with 2 identities, everyone could easily figure out that this two identities are the same person. I think option 2 together should be implemented, added with the possibility to take over (selected) trust states from other local identities. On Mon, May 12, 2008

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1138

2008-04-12 Thread bbackde
Thanks. What happened, did someone even a function test of this feature until it was released? On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 12 April 2008 08:49, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > > Matthew Toseland a écrit : > > > > > - Make the opennet w

[freenet-dev] Frontpage layout

2008-04-06 Thread bbackde
On the node homepage, the bookmarks are below the omnipresent opennet warning. Below the bookmarks I can find the more important boxes for current activity, fetch freesite links and the node version. My bookmarks are long, and I often have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to access the oth

Re: [freenet-dev] Sun Java naming conventions

2008-03-09 Thread bbackde
I don't see your problem with the naming? Runtime API code is "Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13)" The JVM itself is "Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode, sharing)" On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just installed a Java up

Re: [freenet-dev] Unbundling Frost

2008-02-29 Thread bbackde
Just to let you know (in case you still want to ship frost): I plan a new release for today that contains the 'workaround' for DOSed boards as well as the DOS visualization. The java port of fms is still work in progress, I'm in contact with the dev (seagull) but he needs a few more evenings... O

[freenet-dev] Effect of MaxRetries value on ADNFs

2008-02-07 Thread bbackde
Frost now optionally skips KSK keys which got an ADNF quickly. This means they are never retried. When the option is turned on, Frost requests the KSK keys using a MaxRetries=2. During my tests I experienced that a MaxRetries=1 seems to need the same nodeTime (time between start and end of the fcp2

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-26 Thread bbackde
On Jan 26, 2008 12:55 PM, Michael Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Maybe it would help if we would be able to retrieve a KSK without to > > retrieve the underlying CHK. Then we could check the underlying > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] key if we already know this key. In this

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-26 Thread bbackde
FYI: Stats from my Frost running for appr. 18 hours. nodeTime is the time that Frost wait after starting a request until the request finished. Its the sum of all update thread wait times. Maybe it would help if we would be able to retrieve a KSK without to retrieve the underlying CHK. Then we coul

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-24 Thread bbackde
In the meantime I think the lots of ADNF where caused by the slow node. With 1103 it became much better, now I see alot of invalid messages again: Board: frost Date : 2008.1.24 Informations for current session: nodeTime: 00:46:31 (5,7 s/req) countTriedIndices : 490 currentIndex : 517 maxI

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-22 Thread bbackde
Wouldn't this be much faster? If he inserts redirects to the same junk, then it is already in my store. Now we have to wait until the key gets an ADNF (after an expensive network search). On Jan 22, 2008 9:04 PM, Michael Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > He lately sw

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-22 Thread bbackde
On Jan 22, 2008 8:25 PM, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If Frost receives ALL_DATA_NOT_FOUND, it keeps retrying this index > > during next board updates. > > But the current DoS attack uses many ADNF, and together with th

Re: [freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-22 Thread bbackde
I added a board update information to the current Frost code in svn (very alpha). It shows some stats about the about progress per board and day. I run it for just 1 or 2 hours now, see the stats for today and yesterday: most of them are ADNF. Board: frost Date : 2008.1.22 Informations for curren

[freenet-dev] Retries of ADNF keys

2008-01-22 Thread bbackde
If Frost receives ALL_DATA_NOT_FOUND, it keeps retrying this index during next board updates. But the current DoS attack uses many ADNF, and together with the backload (days to download backward) it takes ages until a board completes to update. My question is: what is a good way to re-request keys

Re: [freenet-dev] Store size not used

2007-12-08 Thread bbackde
What I wonder about: after I run freenet for more than a year, why did it only collect 10GB in the store? May others have a larger usage? On Dec 8, 2007 6:10 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not count each key, but its at 10% for months now. > > > On Dec 8, 2007 5:57 PM, Matthew Toseland <[E

Re: [freenet-dev] Store size not used

2007-12-08 Thread bbackde
I do not count each key, but its at 10% for months now. On Dec 8, 2007 5:57 PM, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 08 December 2007 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I run freenet 0.7 for a very long time. My datastore size is 200GB, > > and my cache is 100% full. > > But

[freenet-dev] Store size not used

2007-12-08 Thread bbackde
I run freenet 0.7 for a very long time. My datastore size is 200GB, and my cache is 100% full. But the storage is still only at 10% of its maximum size, and it doesn't grow. There was some discussion about this in the past, but I see no advance. I know this has something to do with specialization,

Re: [freenet-dev] Why Freenet is so SLOW! Proposal for new load management

2007-11-30 Thread bbackde
I have the same problems here, soon I have to shutdown my node to be able to do any other things! Output Rate: 103 KiB/sec (of 20.0 KiB) On Nov 30, 2007 4:43 AM, Michael Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > In 1076, I made a perhaps fortuitous mistake: I changed Request

[freenet-dev] unacceptable store shrink time

2007-10-13 Thread bbackde
I don't know if it works as designed, but I discovered the following today: I wanted to shrink my full store from 81GiB cache size to 75GiB. I stopped the node, changed the store size and restarted the node. In wrapper.log I followed the progress. The node started to scan for holes in the store pri

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-26 Thread bbackde
And because you think that you became aggressive immediately? No, if I would want to blackmail you because I'm too silly to implement your TestDDA I would have said "don't make it mandatory". But the point is (and I feel you don't want to accept this because its your "baby") that the alternate pro

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-26 Thread bbackde
Thanks Matthew. On 9/26/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 25 September 2007 23:24, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-25 20:22:24]: > > > > > On Tuesday 25 September 2007 17:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > My point is not to

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-25 Thread bbackde
My point is not to change the principles of the TestDDA implementation. The proposal describes a different way of implementation that fits for stateless clients. The current implementation requires that you send out-of-order testdda requests if the node sends an error, and then the client have to r

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-25 Thread bbackde
No Frost doesn't do this for all files. And the point is that the node have to compute the filehash also! We tried this with files on a network drive (read-only) and from DVD and it becomes incredible slow... On 9/25/07, cbreak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Also, if th

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-25 Thread bbackde
> Also, if the filesystem is readonly, you *will* need to use FileHash instead > of TestDDA. This comment let me start thinking about the TestDDA design. Because if the directory is read-only, the client have to handle the node error (node cannot write the file) and the client must restart the req

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-20 Thread bbackde
On 9/20/07, Florent Daignière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-20 09:00:28]: > > > Now, as TestDDA becames nearly mandatory (there is still an option to > > disable the need for TestDDA), I am forced to implement it, even if I > > have no time for it. An

[freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

2007-09-20 Thread bbackde
Now, as TestDDA becames nearly mandatory (there is still an option to disable the need for TestDDA), I am forced to implement it, even if I have no time for it. Anyhow... Studying the docs about the design of TestDDA, I wonder why it was implemented in a way that requires the node AND the client t

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1055/1056

2007-09-02 Thread bbackde
The node page says Version Information & Node Control Freenet 0.7 Build #1056 r14871 Freenet-ext Build #13 (17 is recommended) r12938 Shortly after a node start, the node page says A new stable version of Freenet is available It seems that your node isn't running the latest version of the softwa

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1055/1056

2007-09-02 Thread bbackde
> - Require a new freenet-ext.jar (#17), which includes an updated database engine. Where can I get this #17 ? No auto-update is available, and a manual invocation of update.cmd finds no new jars. I'm still on #13, so 1056 doesn't require #17 as you said ;) On 8/31/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PR

Re: [freenet-dev] Propagating opennet refs through darknet nodes

2007-07-27 Thread bbackde
I like it. On 7/26/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:01, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote: > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]: > > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to fo

Re: [freenet-dev] BitArray possible (little) bug?

2007-07-23 Thread bbackde
> setAllOnes() to set all bits true, maybe use BitSet.set(int fromIndex, int toIndex) with fromIndex=0 and toIndex=BitSet.size() > firstOne() to find the first true bit, maybe use BitSet.nextSetBit(0) > writeToDataOutputStream() BitSet is already Serializable. But maybe you need to reimplement it

Re: [freenet-dev] BitArray possible (little) bug?

2007-07-12 Thread bbackde
Slightly off topic question: why don't you use the existing java.util.BitSet? This seems to work for me in Frost. On 7/12/07, Sback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I try to set a bit in a place bigger than the BitArray size, > sometimes it does not raise an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. It see

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA issue

2007-07-09 Thread bbackde
Depends on the case. I know of users who want to upload from DVDs because they don't have enough free space on the hdd. They start the upload, wait until it is finished and remove the DVD afterwards. On 7/9/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 08 July 2007 11:53, [EMAIL PROT

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA issue

2007-07-08 Thread bbackde
Wouldn't it be possible to enhance TestDDA for read-only files? The node could choose a part of a file (or more parts) with some KB of size and check if the client sends the same hash for the parts as the node computed. Client->Node: TestDDA file=/abc mode=ForPUT Node->Client: Provide Hash for off

[freenet-dev] TestDDA issue

2007-07-08 Thread bbackde
Hello, I want to implement the TestDDA functionality, but I will wait until TestDDA supports DDA from read-only devices (upload of files from DVD). Is this already possible, did I miss something? ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.f

[freenet-dev] perst database

2007-06-26 Thread bbackde
Hello, I currently evaluate perst (mcobject.com, open source) for usage in Frost for some vital internal tables. It looks very stable and fast (after you understand how it works). Did you ever consider to use perst instead of berkeley DB? It seems to be perfect for huge indices and even dbs with l

Re: [freenet-dev] More database/datastore problems

2007-05-16 Thread bbackde
> 6) Roll our own database code. Better don't try to make it better by yourself what other teams did not accomplish. IF there is no crash-stable free DB outside there, its maybe not possible to code one. Try DB/2 Express ;) On 5/16/07, Chris Carlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So our options

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

2007-05-01 Thread bbackde
Ok nice. And I didn't want to offend you, I just wanted to get this problem back in mind :) Thanks. On 5/1/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-01 18:50:31]: > > > You may be right. But the problem is that the request seem

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

2007-05-01 Thread bbackde
You may be right. But the problem is that the request seem to stall internally without to fail or to do anything else. And this is not ok. So now we know that reregisterAll helps, nothing new but its an info :) Some solution would be nice. Toad siad this is hard to debug, but if we check the vari

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

2007-04-30 Thread bbackde
This seems to be related to the problem, maybe you get an idea what wents wrong: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2007.04.29 - 20:34:36GMT - FYI - If a FQUID download stalls, try lowering the priority, and then raising it again. This seems to get things moving. I had been using "Retry Failed Blo

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

2007-04-24 Thread bbackde
Just an obervation: I have a download running which stucks at some point. But it keeps running, means it doesn't fail. No matter how long the node runs, the download seems to hang. If I restart the node, then suddenly the download continues and more blocks arrive, until it stucks again. If I restar

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

2007-04-14 Thread bbackde
Ah, so for WantRead a client must handle WriteFilename and ContentToWrite, true? Really consuding, is'nt it ;) On 4/14/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-14 12:30:53]: > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[freenet-dev] Fwd: TestDDA questions

2007-04-14 Thread bbackde
One more question: DDA makes most sense when I want to PUT (write) files from a read-only medium like a CD. But with the current TestDDA implementation I would not any longer be able to PUT files from a CD using DDA (because the client cannot write the file to the requested directory), true? I have

[freenet-dev] TestDDA questions

2007-04-14 Thread bbackde
I read the wiki doc about TestDDA and I have some comments/questions. 1) Please define "READ" and "WRITE" exactly. > Do you plan to do any read operation? After some time I came to the conclusion that "READ" means I want to GET/request a file from freenet, and the node have to write it into the d

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread bbackde
It uniquely identifies a specific message, the UMID serves a primary key in the message database table (prevents duplicate messages) and is used in the reply-to chain of message threads. Very important thing. On 4/12/07, Joel C. Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread bbackde
On 4/12/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-12 15:38:35]: > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) > > wrote: > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-12 14:06:28]: > > > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread bbackde
I looked over your source, but where is the point when the node READS the file written by the client? It looks like the readFile is created by the node? Did I misunderstand this? I think its better when I wait with the testDDA implementation until the node version that provides this new messages

Re: [freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread bbackde
As soon as I get a final doc for it I will include it. I planned the release for today, but maybe I can postpone it until tomorrow :) waiting for docs. On 4/12/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-12 09:37:29]: > > > The ne

[freenet-dev] FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread bbackde
The next Frost release is the LAST release that accepts messages from a Frost version earlier than 20-Jun-2006! Starting with the release after the next one all Frost messages must contain a valid unique message id, or the message is revoked by the receiving Frost. I don't know if this affects the

[freenet-dev] Upload retry in fproxy

2007-03-31 Thread bbackde
What happens when I click retry on a failed upload in the queue page? An FCP client have to remove the item, and to add it again. Does the queue page do it also this way, keeping all clients updated about this? ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.or

[freenet-dev] Uploads fail

2007-03-31 Thread bbackde
I often see a problem with uploads in the global queue: Frost starts the upload, and the upload continues without problems until it reaches 100%. Then the upload item is shown as failed on the fproxy queue page (Temp file error), but NO fcp2 message about this was sent to the applications! Is this

Re: [freenet-dev] Frost and createFileOnly

2007-03-30 Thread bbackde
And Frost doesn't create the files, of course. This would have not worked with earlier freenet versions too. Try 1022. On 3/30/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With what build of Freenet? Before 1022, the ClientGet handler would > create the file. 1022 and later no longer do this.

  1   2   >