-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After clicking a node's link on the routing table status page, freenet broke
the connection before sending the data. The URL was:
http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/nodeDetails.html?identity=8a3390a6f088c4fdcd304e9a1a0b915494caf8c448baafdec86882
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 08:37 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> bdonlan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I think it should be a config option, defaulting to prefetching, say, 5
> > minutes before 0:00 GMT. e.g:
>
> I see two problems:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 08:07 pm, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:24:16PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > This is all very well, but lets just get the simple functionality
> > working first, then we can worry about more ambitious ways to address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 01:07 pm, Pascal wrote:
> About 4 months ago droden moved the fproxy interface from using GIFs to
> using PNGs because the GIF format was under patent by Unisys.
> Unfortunately not all browsers support transparent PNGs. The Uni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 11 May 2003 03:26 pm, Jukka Holappa wrote:
> Frank v Waveren wrote:
> > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:10:46PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> >>Just take the images out of the images *servlet* and put them into a
> >>freenet/images *folder*. And ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suggest updating the .cvsignore in the root directory of the freenet CVS as
follows:
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 May 2003 06:44 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> You're quite right - I've put the original code back.
[snip]
I haven't actually looked beyond the function in question, but changing the
return type also fixes it, and if the design of the class
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 May 2003 06:27 pm, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2003 12:04 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/http
> > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv28724
[snip]
> > public final Rou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 March 2003 10:44 pm, Paul Robison wrote:
> I added fec-linux-x86.jar to my classpath in start-freenet.sh, and my
> node has been doing native fec for over 6 months without any problems.
Hm. Where can I get this .jar?
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 March 2003 10:44 pm, Paul Robison wrote:
> I added fec-linux-x86.jar to my classpath in start-freenet.sh, and my
> node has been doing native fec for over 6 months without any problems.
Hm. Where can I get this .jar?
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:44 pm, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
> panamerica334 at uni.de wrote:
> > but this time i was wondering about the used links in the fproxy
> > frontpage, as i accidently came across them with my mouse cursor:
> >
> > networking: o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:44 pm, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > but this time i was wondering about the used links in the fproxy
> > frontpage, as i accidently came across them with my mouse cursor:
> >
> > networking: open co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got this (and many more like it) in my log:
Mar 14, 2003 5:34:02 PM (freenet.session.FnpLink, QThread-794): Generated
challenge in 2195 at 1047681242731
They happen every second or so, and after that particular one my node
apparently died. What ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got this (and many more like it) in my log:
Mar 14, 2003 5:34:02 PM (freenet.session.FnpLink, QThread-794): Generated
challenge in 2195 at 1047681242731
They happen every second or so, and after that particular one my node
apparently died. What ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 07:00 pm, jrandom wrote:
> 'lo. Well, as I'm sure most of you have noticed, TFE is DNFing at the
> moment, and while I think we have a good set of starting links, its kind
> of frustrating to new users to click on the fir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 07:00 pm, jrandom wrote:
> 'lo. Well, as I'm sure most of you have noticed, TFE is DNFing at the
> moment, and while I think we have a good set of starting links, its kind
> of frustrating to new users to click on the fir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:25 pm, bdonlan wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 07:09 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > For those who frequent Kuro5hin (http://kuro5hin.org/), I wrote an
> > update on Freenet's progress that is currently in t
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:09 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> For those who frequent Kuro5hin (http://kuro5hin.org/), I wrote an
> update on Freenet's progress that is currently in the submissions queue.
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:25 pm, bdonlan wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 07:09 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > For those who frequent Kuro5hin (http://kuro5hin.org/), I wrote an
> > update on Freenet's progress that is currently in t
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:09 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> For those who frequent Kuro5hin (http://kuro5hin.org/), I wrote an
> update on Freenet's progress that is currently in the submissions queue.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 10:17 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Scott Young (scottyoung at adelphia.net) wrote:
> > Also, I have a lot of partitions. Freenet is installed on my F drive,
> > the temp directory is on my C drive, and I was saving the movie t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 10:17 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Scott Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Also, I have a lot of partitions. Freenet is installed on my F drive,
> > the temp directory is on my C drive, and I was saving the movie to my H
>
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 07:00 pm, jrandom wrote:
> Ok, here's a quick test to see what JVMs support java.util.logging. Take
> the included Java code, compile it, and run it. You'll also need to create
> a file "logging.properties" in your current directory and put the
> properties listed be
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 07:00 pm, jrandom wrote:
> Ok, here's a quick test to see what JVMs support java.util.logging. Take
> the included Java code, compile it, and run it. You'll also need to create
> a file "logging.properties" in your current directory and put the
> properties listed be
On Monday 03 March 2003 08:23 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I am curious as to the current status of the Windows Installer, and
> whether there are any outstanding TODOs (along with whether anyone is
> willing to take care of them).
>
> In my view, they are (in order of importance):
>
> * Support automat
On Monday 03 March 2003 08:23 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I am curious as to the current status of the Windows Installer, and
> whether there are any outstanding TODOs (along with whether anyone is
> willing to take care of them).
>
> In my view, they are (in order of importance):
>
> * Support automat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 March 2003 05:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > As someone who, in a previous life, spent many months working on an
> > > XSLT-based HTML templating engine, I have one word of advice - "don't".
> >
> > It looks ideal to make a HTML page from
On Sunday 02 March 2003 09:28 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > page). It would be cool to get transparent XSLT. XSLT with XPath,
> > XPointer, and some other W3C recommendations would provide an extremely
>
> As someone who, in a previous life, spent many months working on an
> XSLT-based HTML templatin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 March 2003 05:40 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > As someone who, in a previous life, spent many months working on an
> > > XSLT-based HTML templating engine, I have one word of advice - "don't".
> >
> > It looks ideal to make a HTML page from
On Sunday 02 March 2003 09:28 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > page). It would be cool to get transparent XSLT. XSLT with XPath,
> > XPointer, and some other W3C recommendations would provide an extremely
>
> As someone who, in a previous life, spent many months working on an
> XSLT-based HTML templatin
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:18 pm, Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> No, it's not my email client, but the topic shift caught me waay off guard.
> Brains generally do not handle major shifts in a short time very well.
>
> Anyways, I will not touch the java code for Fred or FProxy. That's left for
> the de
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No, it's not my email client, but the topic shift caught me waay off guard.
> Brains generally do not handle major shifts in a short time very well.
>
> Anyways, I will not touch the java code for Fred or FProxy. That's left for
> the dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:38 am, Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> Huh? Where did blocks come into templating?
What are you replying to? I don't have any idea what you're talking about.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Huh? Where did blocks come into templating?
What are you replying to? I don't have any idea what you're talking about.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQ
On Saturday 01 March 2003 07:40 pm, fish wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:12:24PM -0500, Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> > Would you use it? It's being written in Python.
> > What do you want in it? What types of tags and stuff? [INCLUDE] and
> > [LINK] obviously.
>
> well, no, not me, i wrote my ow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 March 2003 01:12 pm, Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to start writing a templating system, basically for managing
> freesites. The idea is that, since Freenet can really only handle static
> content, I write a tool to take a te
On Saturday 01 March 2003 07:40 pm, fish wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:12:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Would you use it? It's being written in Python.
> > What do you want in it? What types of tags and stuff? [INCLUDE] and
> > [LINK] obviously.
>
> well, no, not me, i wrote my own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 March 2003 01:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to start writing a templating system, basically for managing
> freesites. The idea is that, since Freenet can really only handle static
> content, I write a tool to take a tem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:37 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 02:51:38PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tuesday 25 February 2003 12:11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 12:11 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:24:25PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Monday 24 February 2003 09:01 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 February 2003 10:36 pm, fish wrote:
> Ideally, we'd have a free sun v1.4 quality
> JVM, or at least sun v1.4 would build fred (btw, if anyone knows how
> to make it do this, can you please tell me? java 1.3 really
> hates my system).
Try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 February 2003 01:23 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Typical NAT routers don't handle self-referencing IPs well. In other
> > words, if my NAT router's WAN address is 123.45.67.89 and a LAN machine
> > (say, 10.10.10.1) tries to talk to 123.45.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 February 2003 12:04 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to allow an extra field on DataRequests,
> something like
> FailIfDNFAfter=
>
> ?
> This would be checked against the failure table (along with the HTL,
> obviously)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 February 2003 03:38 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include
> some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in
> fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:25 pm, David McNab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While FCP is comfortable for most things, it's painfully low-level when
> it comes to FEC/splitfiles.
>
> The logic for FEC/splitfiles is already in Fred, because FProxy uses it.
>
> S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 11:57 am, Glenn Crocker wrote:
> *** A fresh Freenet install should request the home pages for the 4 intro
> page sites. If you want new Windows users to have a good experience, this
> would help a lot. It might also hel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a web insert, there is a return to gateway link. How about an option in
the POST request that could change the title and destination url of that
link? It'd have to pass through the anonymity filter, of course.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 02:40 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > It commented out tempDir.
> > Before:
> > tempDir=/tmp/freenet
> > After:
> > %tempDir=/tmp/freenet
> >
> > Also, it reset my node's port.
>
> Yeh... I did say in my follow up post that it wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why does the FEC encoder output to the console? Console output should be
reserved for emergencies (and IMO heisenbugs don't cound), not successes.
Example:
Encoding stripe: 0 [131072]
Made 64 131072 byte check blocks in 36368ms.
Encoding stripe: 1 [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 08:29 am, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > There should be an app to read in the configuration file, and then output
> > it with the latest defaults, but with user-provided values from the old
> > config in as well.
>
> If you run jav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 February 2003 05:46 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:07:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am sometimes blocked from your server! I think i am blocked, because
> > there are some IPs blocked and i get some o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 February 2003 03:49 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:36:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > when left at the current situation, one cannot reinsert a fallen off file
> > which is mentioned in the site's map vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 16 February 2003 06:31 pm, Luckypunk wrote:
> freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK at
> freenet.keys.SVK.(SVK.java:37) at freenet.keys.SVK.(SVK.java:45) at
[snip stacktrace]
What key were you trying to get? It sounds like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 February 2003 12:31 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > > So, as originally stated, how to find the *actual* mainport.Port used
> > > by fred in such a case? And in general terms how to achieve this for
> > > any %'d conf value.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 February 2003 11:16 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Any thoughts on the possibility of providing a version of the
> web-installer which downloads and installs Java if it proves necessary?
We'd have to check the licence agreement of the JRT in q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a way to get freenet to read in the config file, and output an
up-to-date version with all overridden parameters unchanged, and the rest
commented and showing up-to-date values? If not, this should be implemented;
it'd be an easy way to fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 February 2003 01:31 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 02:22:00PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > With the change in, all tcpip networking intermittently hangs on my
> > machine. I.e. I can't even ping external mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 15 February 2003 01:05 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Has anyone seen this? Is it any good? Should we recommend its use?
> >
> > Depends on how it does setup. What we do NOT need is yet another setup
> > program.
>
> It doesn't - however I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 14 February 2003 06:37 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> bdonlan:
> > I don't understand. Anyway, why not fork() and restrict the child?
>
> That is hardly easy or efficient.
>
> My point is that I've got this n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 14 February 2003 06:12 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> bdonlan:
> > How do you propose isolating the functions and relocating them using
> > current compilers? Getting them to call library function'd be
> > difficult
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 09:06 pm, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 09:03 pm, you wrote:
> > > > I really don't like the idea of encouraging users to use freenet:xxx
> > > > style URIs in web browsers, since they won't be backwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 08:11 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> bdonlan:
> > Use an interpreted language. They'll prevent buffer overflows and you can
> > unimplement unallowed functions.
>
> Buffer overflows are the wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:24 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> bdonlan:
> > And let it at the kernel stack? _BAD_ idea. It can still use
> > printf/scanf to sniff your password anyway.
>
> No, it can't, becuase it will onl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 05:29 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Every windows machine has IE.
>
> Now, you know that isn't true.
Virtually every. And the others can just say "You don't have IE or Mozilla. Go
to (url) to configure Freenet).
> Sorry, di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:29 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> bdonlan:
[snip]
> With code uploading, you could make _sure_ that the terminal would
> only be capable of outputting questions and reading answers in the
> style you wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:26 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:44:48PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 03:10 pm, Chris Dennis wrote stuff about insite.
One post is enough, thanks. If you're not seeing your own posts, check your
list options.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+TA6cx533
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 06:38 pm, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> Jay Oliveri:
> > I don't know what to really think, since conveniently most of
> > their evidence is under NDA.
>
> Devising access control and permissions schemes to limit the
> capabilit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 05:43 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> This may be useful, Hawk is currently sitting in my living room
> connected to my cable modem, hardly a robust environment for the conduit
> for virtually all project communication including t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 05:33 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Write a ConfigServlet and drop that f*cking nodeconfig.exe. SCNR.
> >
> > We'd still need the installer to call the browser with the
> > ConfigServlet. Users expect dialog boxes, so sooner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 01:39 pm, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
> People who donate should get a credit in the Freenet source as well as on
> the website. After all, we are supporting the internet of the future but
> we get little or nothing immediate
On Monday 18 November 2002 04:34 pm, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Anyone interested in doing a protocol extension to Mozilla to support
> "x-freenet://" urls natively?
>
> http://protozilla.mozdev.org/
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.
On Sunday 15 September 2002 08:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi there.
>
> sorry for posting to both lists, but the devl-list is for the developers (i
> heard they only read that list???) and the support-list is for the other
> mere mortals... ;)
>
> the problem is, IE reads and evaluates CSS
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:03 pm, Sascha Wüstemann wrote:
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Um, is somethign wrong with the server? Every message on the support list I've
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:31 am, David McNab wrote:
> Hi Jay (et al)
>
> Just letting you know that I'm continuing with maintenance of the
> 'fcp_0_4_7' branch of fcptools (since there's still the build issue
> with the head branch).
>
> Pulling lots of nasty bugs from 0-4-7, to the point wher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:29 pm, bdonlan wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:40 pm, David McNab wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It gives me pleasure to announce the first release of pyFreenet, which
> > now makes full freen
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:40 pm, David McNab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It gives me pleasure to announce the first release of pyFreenet, which
> now makes full freenet access available to your Python programs.
>
> pyFreenet makes available all the fcptools ezFCPlib functions (for
> inserting/retrieving k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just found this in my log (running with latest CVS)"
...
Feb 9, 2003 8:00:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): starting node
Feb 9, 2003 8:00:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading service: mainport
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
freenet.thread.ThreadFa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:25 pm, Michael Schierl wrote:
> hi freenet developers,
>
> I have some questions regarding FCP:
>
> 1. RouteNotFound provides a field called Reason (iirc) that has some hex
> number in it. What does which number mean? (I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 11:13 am, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> I'd like to announce that a new fcpput is currently working (more or less)
> with normal files as well as FEC encoded splitfiles.
>
> This program is the result of a major rewrite to various por
On Sunday 01 September 2002 02:58 pm, Anonymous wrote:
> I've uploaded a patch to fproxy at
> SSK@hNO8nRj~jh8X2zrebLAXuybO3g4PAgM/progs/fproxy-encoding.patch
>
> It adds support for content encodings to fproxy. If you insert a file
> and specify a Info.Encoding field in the metadata, fproxy will pa
On Sunday 01 September 2002 02:58 pm, Anonymous wrote:
> I've uploaded a patch to fproxy at
> SSK@hNO8nRj~jh8X2zrebLAXuybO3g4PAgM/progs/fproxy-encoding.patch
>
> It adds support for content encodings to fproxy. If you insert a file
> and specify a Info.Encoding field in the metadata, fproxy will pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 09:49 pm, cardhore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> user_pref("browser.goBrowsing.enabled", false);
>
> will disable the auto-querying of search engine in Mozilla.
Oh, and your clock is off. Badly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 09:49 pm, cardhore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> user_pref("browser.goBrowsing.enabled", false);
>
> will disable the auto-querying of search engine in Mozilla.
Where do I put this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:57 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > It's not there.
>
> Try now.
>
> Ian.
OK, it's there now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+RX33x533NjVSos4RAsh5AJ9uJ6LJ5ArT7A1ovqRssESJI0VtNQCgmL/T
Ji
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:10 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I don't see it.
>
> In the menu that appears under the main menu after you login, it should be
> the second item from the top.
It's not there. I inserted a screenshot (png) at
CHK@41M9kBw3j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 03:19 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I know; how would I change my own password? I don't see any buttons to do
> > that.
>
> You should now see a "user preferences" option in the menu after you login,
> you can use this to chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 03:12 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > There's no obvoius way to change the password. Also, here's what I got
> > when I asked it to send me my password (my password is deleted, of
> > course)
>
> Bear in mind that the "serapis" p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 02:29 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Thanks to Marion Bates, work on the new replacement site at
> http://freenetproject.org/tiki/ is continuing. All are welcome to help
> edit and add to the site. If you want to help out, go to
is
> important that the site is simple and clear, particularly for first-time
> users.
>
> Ian.
There's no obvoius way to change the password. Also, here's what I got when I
asked it to send me my password (my password is deleted, of course)
- ---
Hi, bdonlan someone from freenetp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 08:49 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:30:48PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 06 February 2003 08:00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 08:00 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:44:22PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > wget -S -O - http://localhost:8891/d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wget -S -O - http://localhost:8891/disturl.txt
- --17:43:12-- http://localhost:8891/disturl.txt
=> `-'
Resolving localhost... done.
Connecting to localhost[127.0.0.1]:8891... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
Read error (C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:03 pm, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:49:50AM +, Matthew Toseland spake thusly:
> > * Get more detail about Heisenbug instances
>
> Exactly what is known about the Heisenbug?
>
> I got a console ful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 December 1969 07:00 pm, jrandom wrote:
> Hola,
> I'm putting together some documentation on the freenet network
> protocol and I'd love if I could get some feedback as to the
> correctness of whats there so far. Currently, I have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 08:31 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:13:30PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:57
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:57 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:39:34PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > When I start freenet with ipAddress com
imes on the same key then stop. It frequently appears when the
node is stressed. I've seen this with recent CVS builds - IIRC, I'd just
updated from CVS.
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:37:57PM -0500, bdonlan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When reteiving SSK@h6xeO0dG9NdimQssAAolkPuBp-UPAgM/altalt// and
SSK@8%7ev1O0roBBmgZXxbT4pEgxlDA1sPAgM/currentContents/2// it gets Unknown
Network Error with the following stack trace:
freenet.client.WrongStateException: Wrong state: FAILED should be D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When reteiving SSK@h6xeO0dG9NdimQssAAolkPuBp-UPAgM/altalt// and
SSK@8%7ev1O0roBBmgZXxbT4pEgxlDA1sPAgM/currentContents/2// it gets Unknown
Network Error with the following stack trace:
freenet.client.WrongStateException: Wrong state: FAILED should be
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
