; without changing the URI.
As I already said, I think the solution for that would be a dedicated FCP heal
command. This would even allow reinsertion of other people's SSKs
Guido
said, I think the solution for that would be a dedicated FCP heal
command. This would even allow reinsertion of other people's SSKs
Guido
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I would really appreciate input on option 2 i.e. how much of a problem are
> long CHKs?
If CHK key lengths as they are now are not bad enough to keep people from
using them, then making them 50% longer won't be, either.
Besides,
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I would really appreciate input on option 2 i.e. how much of a problem are
long CHKs?
If CHK key lengths as they are now are not bad enough to keep people from
using them, then making them 50% longer won't be, either.
Besides,
ed, encrypt every data block with
that key and then put the key into the manifest, right next to the metadata.
A potential problem with this is that it could put healers into the same
uncomfortable position that inserters are in now. Maybe tell people not to
talk about it if they're reinserting something?
Guido
with
that key and then put the key into the manifest, right next to the metadata.
A potential problem with this is that it could put healers into the same
uncomfortable position that inserters are in now. Maybe tell people not to
talk about it if they're reinserting something?
Guido
Am Freitag, 3. April 2009 02:30:09 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> > NextGen$
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> [..]
>
> > G3IAoIo?
>
> Your pgp signature is charset corrupted.
The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted?
Looks fine to me, btw.
--
| _ |
Am Freitag, 3. April 2009 02:30:09 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
NextGen$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
[..]
G3IAoIo⎿伜堏鍙䶞㢈榷㑴
Your pgp signature is charset corrupted.
The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted?
Looks fine to me, btw.
--
| _ | ASCII Ribbon
g similar problems, but it seems there is some luck involved there:
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Also, frost gets disconnected
fairly often during a single session. (Which is obviously bad for board
updates.)
Guido
--
| _ | ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Emails.
| ( ) |
| X |
| / \ |
it doesn't. Also, frost gets disconnected
fairly often during a single session. (Which is obviously bad for board
updates.)
Guido
--
| _ | ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Emails.
| ( ) |
| X |
| / \ |
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann:
> >
> > I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks like this now (see attachment).
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann:
> Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> > It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large
> > datastore. Do you have still any error message _before_ theses lines?
>
>
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, guido wrote:
> > After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That
> > was yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point
> > when this
After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was
yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when
this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now, and
it still hasn't finished restarting.
The wrapper.log is full with
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann:
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large
datastore. Do you have still any error message _before_ theses lines?
The earliest messages
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann:
I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks like this now (see attachment).
It looks like if this continues
After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was
yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when
this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now, and
it still hasn't finished restarting.
The wrapper.log is full with
Am Freitag, 21. M?rz 2008 14:53:50 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 21 March 2008 03:32, guido wrote:
> > I noticed that in this build, the "friends" page reports "Other
> > output: -8841846 B (-3%)". That can't be right.
>
> 0% here. Let me know if it
Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 14:53:50 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 21 March 2008 03:32, guido wrote:
I noticed that in this build, the friends page reports Other
output: -8841846 B (-3%). That can't be right.
0% here. Let me know if it increases beyond 3%.
Right now I've got:
Other
Am Donnerstag, 20. M?rz 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1126 is now available (sorry). Please upgrade, it will be
> mandatory on Saturday. This contains a series of bugfixes for the last two
> builds, relating to the new SSK messages, and the output bandwidth stats
> (which
Am Donnerstag, 20. M?rz 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Thursday 20 March 2008 20:37, Guido wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 20. M?rz 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > On Thursday 20 March 2008 19:51, guido wrote:
> > > > For me, this build has brought a signi
Am Donnerstag, 20. M?rz 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Thursday 20 March 2008 19:51, guido wrote:
> > For me, this build has brought a significant drop in the load caused by
> > freenet on my machine. Until now, running freenet has always caused an
> > average load of at
For me, this build has brought a significant drop in the load caused by
freenet on my machine. Until now, running freenet has always caused an
average load of at least 4, slowing down everything else on this box. After
this upgrade, the load is a much more bearable 0.2, and everything else has
For me, this build has brought a significant drop in the load caused by
freenet on my machine. Until now, running freenet has always caused an
average load of at least 4, slowing down everything else on this box. After
this upgrade, the load is a much more bearable 0.2, and everything else has
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Thursday 20 March 2008 20:37, Guido wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Thursday 20 March 2008 19:51, guido wrote:
For me, this build has brought a significant drop in the load caused
by freenet
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Freenet 0.7 build 1126 is now available (sorry). Please upgrade, it will be
mandatory on Saturday. This contains a series of bugfixes for the last two
builds, relating to the new SSK messages, and the output bandwidth stats
(which affect
t-support about one and a half months ago,
but haven't received any answer to it yet.
Guido
and a half months ago,
but haven't received any answer to it yet.
Guido
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
y that is not universally understandable. (What is a "node" to
someone new to networking and P2P?)
Guido
[ ] No
Keep it simple and to the point. Don't use complicated sentence structures,
don't use very long sentences, don't throw in stuff in brackets, don't use
terminology that is not universally understandable. (What is a node to
someone new to networking and P2P?)
Guido
but
> it's better than freenet jargon, and the whole friends list thing is pretty
> universal post-AIM anyway.
I think it should also be pointed out that the first option means that
*anybody* can find out that the user is using freenet, while with the second
option only his or her selected friends will be able to.
Guido
think it should also be pointed out that the first option means that
*anybody* can find out that the user is using freenet, while with the second
option only his or her selected friends will be able to.
Guido
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
Am Dienstag, 6. M?rz 2007 20:52 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> MRogers posted the following on Frost:
>
> http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewPacketFormat
> http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewTransportLayer
>
> Any feedback would be welcome. These are the new proposed formats for
> the packet transport
Am Dienstag, 6. März 2007 20:52 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
MRogers posted the following on Frost:
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewPacketFormat
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewTransportLayer
Any feedback would be welcome. These are the new proposed formats for
the packet transport layer
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2007 15:01 schrieb Florent Daigni?re:
> Hi,
>
> In r12003 and r12006 I have updated the bdb code to 3.2.13 using
> the official release from oracle.com.
Could you summarize what benefits we might see from the newer version?
Guido
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 15:01 schrieb Florent Daignière:
Hi,
In r12003 and r12006 I have updated the bdb code to 3.2.13 using
the official release from oracle.com.
Could you summarize what benefits we might see from the newer version?
Guido
17,473 (546 MiB)
Overall size: 19,694 / 1,227,554 (615 MiB / 37.4 GiB) (1%)
Cache hits: 676 / 9,949 (6%)
Store hits: 25 / 7,698 (0%)
Avg. access rate: 1/s
nodeUptime: 2h54m
Doesn't look very good, does it?
Guido
--
Mailing list archives are not a proper form of documentation.
size: 19,694 / 1,227,554 (615 MiB / 37.4 GiB) (1%)
Cache hits: 676 / 9,949 (6%)
Store hits: 25 / 7,698 (0%)
Avg. access rate: 1/s
nodeUptime: 2h54m
Doesn't look very good, does it?
Guido
--
Mailing list archives are not a proper form of documentation
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2006 02:09 schrieb toad:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
> > Also, what's with this line:
> >
> > ---
> > Overall size: 1,136,650/2,194,293 (~34.6 GiB/66.9 GiB)
> > ---
> >
> >
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2006 02:09 schrieb toad:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
Also, what's with this line:
---
Overall size: 1,136,650/2,194,293 (~34.6 GiB/66.9 GiB)
---
I've configured my node for a maximum store size of 40 GiB
Hi,
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 01:01 schrieb toad:
> 1. THE STORE IS *LESS* EFFECTIVE THAN THE CACHE!
>
>
>
> Please could people post their store statistics? Cache hits, store hits,
> cached keys, stored keys.
>
> So far:
> [23:11] # Cached
Hi,
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 01:01 schrieb toad:
1. THE STORE IS *LESS* EFFECTIVE THAN THE CACHE!
Please could people post their store statistics? Cache hits, store hits,
cached keys, stored keys.
So far:
[23:11] nextgens # Cached keys:
42 matches
Mail list logo
