[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

On Friday 27 November 2009 23:56:48 Ian Clarke wrote: > If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider > immediately as they can fix this at no cost to us. > > Is it true? It seems so. Regarding backups: [20:51] toad_: i recently asked you whether we have recent backups of the

[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

Ok, can someone email me off list explaining the problem and the evidence for it, and I'll let Bytemark know. Ian. On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:57 PM, xor wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:56:48 Ian Clarke wrote: > > If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider > > immediately

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

On Friday 27 November 2009 23:56:48 Ian Clarke wrote: If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider immediately as they can fix this at no cost to us. Is it true? It seems so. Regarding backups: [20:51] p0s toad_: i recently asked you whether we have recent backups of the

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

Ok, can someone email me off list explaining the problem and the evidence for it, and I'll let Bytemark know. Ian. On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:57 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote: On Friday 27 November 2009 23:56:48 Ian Clarke wrote: If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider

[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

Hi, someone said on IRC recently that the RAID in emu has had a failed disk. Is this true? Has it been replaced? If not, is there any other redundancy left? What about backups, are there any automatic backups done? xor -- next part -- An HTML attachment was

[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider immediately as they can fix this at no cost to us. Is it true? Ian. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:49 PM, xor wrote: > Hi, > > someone said on IRC recently that the RAID in emu has had a failed disk. > Is this true? > Has it been replaced?

[freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

Hi, someone said on IRC recently that the RAID in emu has had a failed disk. Is this true? Has it been replaced? If not, is there any other redundancy left? What about backups, are there any automatic backups done? xor signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu disk failure?

If this is true then we need to inform our hosting provider immediately as they can fix this at no cost to us. Is it true? Ian. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:49 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote: Hi, someone said on IRC recently that the RAID in emu has had a failed disk. Is this true? Has it been

[freenet-dev] Emu translation updates files fixed was Re: Translations : how to improve them ?

On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:12:38 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 02 July 2009 16:27:01 sashee wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I agree with Dieppe. > > There should be a simple system that manages translations. The primary > > language should be english, cuz everyone understands it. Then every > >

[freenet-dev] Emu translation updates files fixed was Re: Translations : how to improve them ?

On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:12:38 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2009 16:27:01 sashee wrote: Hi! I agree with Dieppe. There should be a simple system that manages translations. The primary language should be english, cuz everyone understands it. Then every key is either

[freenet-dev] Emu

On Monday 06 April 2009 04:55:51 Ian Clarke wrote: > Hey Nextgens, > > Can you confirm that you will agree to continue to administer the > server until after the next release (assuming that we release it > roughly on the schedule we hope)? I thought this was our agreement. > > I think the

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu

On Monday 06 April 2009 04:55:51 Ian Clarke wrote: Hey Nextgens, Can you confirm that you will agree to continue to administer the server until after the next release (assuming that we release it roughly on the schedule we hope)? I thought this was our agreement. I think the appropriate

[freenet-dev] Emu

Hey Nextgens, Can you confirm that you will agree to continue to administer the server until after the next release (assuming that we release it roughly on the schedule we hope)? I thought this was our agreement. I think the appropriate course of action here is for us to try to outsource as

[freenet-dev] Emu

Dear community, Most of you are probably aware that I was the one wearing the BOFH cap and doing the sysadmin work on the project's server (emu). I am using a past tense here because I am not anymore; I resigned. Like iakin, dolphin and others who did that tedious task before, I feel like it

[freenet-dev] Emu

Dear community, Most of you are probably aware that I was the one wearing the BOFH cap and doing the sysadmin work on the project's server (emu). I am using a past tense here because I am not anymore; I resigned. Like iakin, dolphin and others who did that tedious task before, I feel like it

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu

Hey Nextgens, Can you confirm that you will agree to continue to administer the server until after the next release (assuming that we release it roughly on the schedule we hope)? I thought this was our agreement. I think the appropriate course of action here is for us to try to outsource as

[freenet-dev] Emu, new IP address, renewed SSL certificates, scheduled downtime

* Florent Daigni?re [2007-10-23 10:44:02]: > Hi, > > As some of you might have noticed, emu's IP address has changed > (from 80.68.80.201 to 89.16.176.201). Both IP addresses should > be available for the time being as we need to wait for DNS > records to propagate

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu, new IP address, renewed SSL certificates, scheduled downtime

* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-23 10:44:02]: Hi, As some of you might have noticed, emu's IP address has changed (from 80.68.80.201 to 89.16.176.201). Both IP addresses should be available for the time being as we need to wait for DNS records to

[freenet-dev] Emu, new IP address, renewed SSL certificates, scheduled downtime

Hi, As some of you might have noticed, emu's IP address has changed (from 80.68.80.201 to 89.16.176.201). Both IP addresses should be available for the time being as we need to wait for DNS records to propagate before deprecating the old one. The current

[freenet-dev] Emu, new IP address, renewed SSL certificates, scheduled downtime

Hi, As some of you might have noticed, emu's IP address has changed (from 80.68.80.201 to 89.16.176.201). Both IP addresses should be available for the time being as we need to wait for DNS records to propagate before deprecating the old one. The current

[freenet-dev] Emu Apache is down again

Freenetproject.org is offline atm -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin -- next part

[freenet-dev] Emu Apache is down again

Freenetproject.org is offline atm -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin

[freenet-dev] Emu

Hi, The repository got corrupted, *again* today. As a result I had to restart emu (on thread of appache went into zombi state, keeping port 80 bound). Tell me if any-service hasn't been restarted. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text

[freenet-dev] Emu

Hi, The repository got corrupted, *again* today. As a result I had to restart emu (on thread of appache went into zombi state, keeping port 80 bound). Tell me if any-service hasn't been restarted. NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[freenet-dev] Emu down again

On Sunday 18 March 2007 12:57:10 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Dave Baker [2007-03-18 12:09:39]: > > > Hi all, > > > > Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just HTTPS, > > so freenetproject.org is down too. > > Well, that's "normal" since we have migrated

[freenet-dev] Emu down again

* Dave Baker [2007-03-18 12:09:39]: > Hi all, > > Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just > HTTPS, > so freenetproject.org is down too. Well, that's "normal" since we have migrated everything to apache2 > > Do we know why this is happenning? 'cause a script

[freenet-dev] Emu down again

Hi all, Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just HTTPS, so freenetproject.org is down too. Do we know why this is happenning? It's becoming somewhat of a regular occurrence now: I'm starting to think we should be looking into other hosting arrangements,

[freenet-dev] Emu down again

Hi all, Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just HTTPS, so freenetproject.org is down too. Do we know why this is happenning? It's becoming somewhat of a regular occurrence now: I'm starting to think we should be looking into other hosting arrangements,

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu down again

* Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-18 12:09:39]: Hi all, Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just HTTPS, so freenetproject.org is down too. Well, that's normal since we have migrated everything to apache2 Do we know why this is happenning? 'cause

Re: [freenet-dev] Emu down again

On Sunday 18 March 2007 12:57:10 Florent Daignière wrote: * Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-18 12:09:39]: Hi all, Emu's down again; it's the whole web server this time, rather than just HTTPS, so freenetproject.org is down too. Well, that's normal since we have migrated

[freenet-dev] emu down again

Now I can reach emu.freenetproject.org (shows a directory), but SVN still fails: RA layer request failed svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/trunk/freenet' svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/trunk/freenet': 405 Method Not Allowed (https://emu.freenetproject.org) On 2/11/07, bbackde at googlemail.com

[freenet-dev] emu down again

* bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-02-11 13:38:15]: > Now I can reach emu.freenetproject.org (shows a directory), but SVN still > fails: > > RA layer request failed > svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/trunk/freenet' > svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/trunk/freenet': 405 Method Not Allowed >

[freenet-dev] emu down again

emu is down, could someone please bring it up again? Thanks.

[freenet-dev] emu down again

emu is down, could someone please bring it up again? Thanks. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] emu down again

Now I can reach emu.freenetproject.org (shows a directory), but SVN still fails: RA layer request failed svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/trunk/freenet' svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/trunk/freenet': 405 Method Not Allowed (https://emu.freenetproject.org) On 2/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-dev] emu down again

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-11 13:38:15]: Now I can reach emu.freenetproject.org (shows a directory), but SVN still fails: RA layer request failed svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/trunk/freenet' svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/trunk/freenet': 405 Method Not Allowed

[freenet-dev] Emu again

* Dave Baker [2007-02-04 11:45:38]: > Hi, > > Emu's HTTPS seems to be down again. Same problem as last time - web server is > fine on port 80 but port 443 is closed. > > > Dave I've restarted it ... No time to investigate now :$

[freenet-dev] Emu again

Hi, Emu's HTTPS seems to be down again. Same problem as last time - web server is fine on port 80 but port 443 is closed. Dave

[freenet-dev] Emu again

Hi, Emu's HTTPS seems to be down again. Same problem as last time - web server is fine on port 80 but port 443 is closed. Dave ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] emu

Read all your mails, then start to answer. Maybe the issue is already solved ;) On 1/27/07, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:09:11AM +, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > > I've got a commit waiting for it to come back.

[freenet-dev] emu

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:35:27PM +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Read all your mails, then start to answer. Maybe the issue is already solved > ;) :) I'm a disruptive person... in future I will (if I remember) queue replies rather than sending them. > > On 1/27/07, Matthew

[freenet-dev] emu

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:09:11AM +, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. > > I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's > been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:09:11AM +, Bob Ham wrote: On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are they

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Read all your mails, then start to answer. Maybe the issue is already solved ;) On 1/27/07, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:09:11AM +, Bob Ham wrote: On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: I've got a commit waiting for it to

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:35:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Read all your mails, then start to answer. Maybe the issue is already solved ;) :) I'm a disruptive person... in future I will (if I remember) queue replies rather than sending them. On 1/27/07, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL

[freenet-dev] emu

David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > Ian Clarke wrote: >> I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is >> nextgens' domain :-( >> > If it helps, I have a lot of experience with Debian on production > servers and might be willing to serve as a backup admin for emu. OK, restarted

[freenet-dev] emu

Thanks David. Ian. On 1/24/07, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > Ian Clarke wrote: > >> I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is > >> nextgens' domain :-( > >> > > If it helps, I have a lot of experience with Debian on production > >

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: Ian Clarke wrote: I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is nextgens' domain :-( If it helps, I have a lot of experience with Debian on production servers and might be willing to serve as a backup admin for emu. OK, restarted apache2 on

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Thanks David. Ian. On 1/24/07, David Sowder (Zothar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: Ian Clarke wrote: I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is nextgens' domain :-( If it helps, I have a lot of experience with Debian on production servers and

[freenet-dev] emu

Ok, thanks! So the shop is closed until nextgens returns On 1/23/07, Bob Ham wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:59 -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > > Sorry Dave, I've been travelling. Nextgens, would you mind > > investigating? > > FYI > > rah at teasel:~$ grep -B 3 "^Jan 20 01:26:03" >

[freenet-dev] emu

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:59 -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > Sorry Dave, I've been travelling. Nextgens, would you mind > investigating? FYI rah at teasel:~$ grep -B 3 "^Jan 20 01:26:03" /store/rah/.xchat2/xchatlogs/#freenet.xchatlog | grep nextgens Jan 20 01:25:39 * nextgens is off for a week Jan

[freenet-dev] emu

Ian Clarke wrote: > I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is > nextgens' domain :-( > If it helps, I have a lot of experience with Debian on production servers and might be willing to serve as a backup admin for emu. > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 5:03 pm, bbackde at

[freenet-dev] emu

I'll be home in a few hours, will see what I can do but this is nextgens' domain :-( On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 5:03 pm, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Ok, thanks! So the shop is closed until nextgens returns > > On 1/23/07, Bob Ham wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:59 -0600, Ian Clarke

[freenet-dev] emu

rwarded message -- > From: Bob Ham > To: Discussion of development issues > Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:09:11 + > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] emu > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. > &

[freenet-dev] emu

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are they on this list? Cheers, Bob -- Bob Ham -- next

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are they on this list? Cheers, Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

of development issues devl@freenetproject.org Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:09:11 + Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] emu On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:59 -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: Sorry Dave, I've been travelling. Nextgens, would you mind investigating? FYI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep -B 3 ^Jan 20 01:26:03 /store/rah/.xchat2/xchatlogs/#freenet.xchatlog | grep nextgens Jan 20 01:25:39 * nextgens is off for a week Jan

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Ok, thanks! So the shop is closed until nextgens returns On 1/23/07, Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:59 -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: Sorry Dave, I've been travelling. Nextgens, would you mind investigating? FYI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep -B 3 ^Jan 20 01:26:03

[freenet-dev] emu

On Monday 22 January 2007 20:36, Ian Clarke wrote: > Works for me. Really? From here, port 443 is closed. There's a web server up on port 80 which serves http://freenetproject.org/ fine, but if I ask it for http://emu.freenetproject.org/, it redirects me to SSL, which of course doesn't work.

[freenet-dev] emu

Emu is completely down, and none is there to fix it. I don't know whats going on... On 1/22/07, Bob Ham wrote: > What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn > access. > > -- > Bob Ham > > > ___ > Devl mailing list > Devl at

[freenet-dev] emu

What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

[freenet-dev] emu

Dave Baker wrote: > On Monday 22 January 2007 20:36, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> Works for me. >> > > Really? From here, port 443 is closed. There's a web server up on port 80 > which serves http://freenetproject.org/ fine, but if I ask it for > http://emu.freenetproject.org/, it redirects me

[freenet-dev] emu

Works for me. On 1/22/07, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > Emu is completely down, and none is there to fix it. I don't know > whats going on... > > On 1/22/07, Bob Ham wrote: > > What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn > > access. > > > > -- > > Bob Ham > > > > >

[freenet-dev] emu

What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Emu is completely down, and none is there to fix it. I don't know whats going on... On 1/22/07, Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devl

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Works for me. On 1/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Emu is completely down, and none is there to fix it. I don't know whats going on... On 1/22/07, Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Monday 22 January 2007 20:36, Ian Clarke wrote: Works for me. Really? From here, port 443 is closed. There's a web server up on port 80 which serves http://freenetproject.org/ fine, but if I ask it for http://emu.freenetproject.org/, it redirects me to SSL, which of course doesn't work.

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

Dave Baker wrote: On Monday 22 January 2007 20:36, Ian Clarke wrote: Works for me. Really? From here, port 443 is closed. There's a web server up on port 80 which serves http://freenetproject.org/ fine, but if I ask it for http://emu.freenetproject.org/, it redirects me to SSL,