On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:26:48PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Toad wrote:
>
> > Default ulimit -n on my (debian) system is 1024. I have no changes in
> > /etc/security/limits.conf. I hear that BSD has an actual fixed size
> > table, but I assumed linux was less braindead. It
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Toad wrote:
> Default ulimit -n on my (debian) system is 1024. I have no changes in
> /etc/security/limits.conf. I hear that BSD has an actual fixed size
> table, but I assumed linux was less braindead. It is. But it imposes a
> default of 1024 anyway. Wonderful. Is this the s
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:41:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >ulimit -n 4096 works fine, and it should for higher numbers as well. Could
> >this be put into start-freenet.sh, or is it unstable/unsafe? Maybe prompt the
> >user with a warning message about memory usage.
>
> Hmm. From w
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:59:06AM -0500, Tiernan Hubble wrote:
> ulimit -n 4096 works fine, and it should for higher numbers as well. Could
> this be put into start-freenet.sh, or is it unstable/unsafe? Maybe prompt the
> user with a warning message about memory usage.
The default HARD limit is
>ulimit -n 4096 works fine, and it should for higher numbers as well. Could
>this be put into start-freenet.sh, or is it unstable/unsafe? Maybe prompt the
>user with a warning message about memory usage.
Hmm. From what I could find on the net windoze doesn't have a limit on open
fd's, so most
ulimit -n 4096 works fine, and it should for higher numbers as well. Could
this be put into start-freenet.sh, or is it unstable/unsafe? Maybe prompt the
user with a warning message about memory usage.
Btw, the default on Mac OS X, at least the version I was using, is 256 - which
meant this was
Default ulimit -n on my (debian) system is 1024. I have no changes in
/etc/security/limits.conf. I hear that BSD has an actual fixed size
table, but I assumed linux was less braindead. It is. But it imposes a
default of 1024 anyway. Wonderful. Is this the same on other
distributions? Yes, I know th
