On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 08:56:12AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On January 22, 2003 08:47 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'B
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 08:56:12AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On January 22, 2003 08:47 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'B
Gianni Johansson writes:
> > Ewww. That's not how freenet works.
> I wouldn't claim to know "how freenet works".
>
I'll follow this trend by agreeing that I don't know how freenet
works, but think that inserts at low HTL are not the way to do things.
> >Longer HTLs mean the data gets
> > clos
Gianni Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ewww. That's not how freenet works.
> I wouldn't claim to know "how freenet works".
>
I'll follow this trend by agreeing that I don't know how freenet
works, but think that inserts at low HTL are not the way to do things.
> >Longer HTLs mean the
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 08:47, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 08:47, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > Is the "healing blocks" options switched
On January 22, 2003 08:47 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06,
On January 22, 2003 08:47 am, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:17:29PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > Is the "healing blocks" options switched
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> > > should be or it won't be nearly as effec
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 13:59, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> > > should be or it won't be nearly as effec
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> > should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
>
> In the unstable build it's not option. It'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
In the unstable build it's not option. It's two fields in the download
inte
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:18:02PM +0100, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> > should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
>
> In the unstable build it's not option. It'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 21. January 2003 18:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
> should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
In the unstable build it's not option. It's two fields in the download
inte
Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage
Is the "healing blocks" options switched on by default? Obviously it
should be or it won't be nearly as effective.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage
18 matches
Mail list logo