Oskar Sandberg writes:
> I just committed a fix for this along the lines we discussed on IRC: it
> downloads everything, but still fails if it ends up with a left over
> metastring at the end. This means that it will actually download the
> default document (for the reasons discussed), but it
Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just committed a fix for this along the lines we discussed on IRC: it
> downloads everything, but still fails if it ends up with a left over
> metastring at the end. This means that it will actually download the
> default document (for the reasons
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:04:44PM -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
<>
> The problem isn't that the default document is matched in step 1c, as
> that's necessary for proper functioning of DBRs; the problem is that
> if file.html wasn't in the cdoc at step 2b, when the final document
> was retrieved, "f
David Allen writes:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> > > mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> > > SSK at Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k4nZWOq5xPl1rkPAgM/FreenetGallery/1//do
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:04:44PM -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
<>
> The problem isn't that the default document is matched in step 1c, as
> that's necessary for proper functioning of DBRs; the problem is that
> if file.html wasn't in the cdoc at step 2b, when the final document
> was retrieved, "f
David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> > > mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> > > SSK@Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k4nZWOq5xPl1rkPAgM/Free
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:41:21AM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> <>
> > Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> > mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> > SSK at Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:41:21AM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> <>
> > Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> > mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> > SSK@Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k4nZ
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:41:21AM -0400, David Allen wrote:
<>
> Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> SSK at Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k4nZWOq5xPl1rkPAgM/FreenetGallery/1//doesnt/exist.txt
> returns the front p
On Saturday 19 October 2002 13:12, Oskar wrote:
> I have no idea how fproxy will react to this (considering it's
> cludginess level, probably badly), so somebody should test it.
Don't hold anything back. Tell us how you really feel. ;-)
I tested it briefly. It appears to be working.
Froxy retur
On Saturday 19 October 2002 13:12, Oskar wrote:
> I have no idea how fproxy will react to this (considering it's
> cludginess level, probably badly), so somebody should test it.
Don't hold anything back. Tell us how you really feel. ;-)
I tested it briefly. It appears to be working.
Froxy retur
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:41:21AM -0400, David Allen wrote:
<>
> Currently, the behavior of fred is to load the default document from a
> mapfile when a nonexistant document name is requested. I.e.
> SSK@Zk3lWHDM6VzA5k4nZWOq5xPl1rkPAgM/FreenetGallery/1//doesnt/exist.txt
> returns the front page
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
<>
> Looking at this another way, I've looked at some of the code for
> fproxy, and I know that a change there isn't appropriate.
> GetRequestProcess.java seems to be the place to change it, but if this
> isn't correct, then what is the
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Oskar Sandberg writes:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > > Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
> >
> > Nobody.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Oskar Sandberg
> > oskar at freenetproject.org
>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:43:58AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> <>
> > Looking at this another way, I've looked at some of the code for
> > fproxy, and I know that a change there isn't appropriate.
> > GetRequestProcess.java seems to
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:43:58AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> <>
> > Looking at this another way, I've looked at some of the code for
> > fproxy, and I know that a change there isn't appropriate.
> > GetRequestProcess.java seems to
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:51:39PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
> > doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
> > demonstrate this, apply
The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
demonstrate this, apply the patch and then go to TFE. I will apply a
patch, if it works.
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.source
David Allen (mda at idatar.com) wrote:
> The patch is attached. Whoever is moderating can I guess delete the
> message that's still pending.
According to Ian Clarke, the moderator is Mr. Dev Null.
--
Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg at wooledge.org
Oskar Sandberg writes:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
>
> Nobody.
>
> --
>
> Oskar Sandberg
> oskar at freenetproject.org
I had almost missed your pessimism. Technically Ian moderates the
list, but he rarely
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
Nobody.
--
Oskar Sandberg
oskar at freenetproject.org
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bi
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
<>
> Looking at this another way, I've looked at some of the code for
> fproxy, and I know that a change there isn't appropriate.
> GetRequestProcess.java seems to be the place to change it, but if this
> isn't correct, then what is the
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > > Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
> >
> > Nobody.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Oskar Sandberg
> > [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:46:09PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > > Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> > > list earlier, but I used
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:51:39PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
> doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
> demonstrate this, apply the patch and then go to TFE. I will apply a
> patch, if it works.
Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
>
> Nobody.
>
> --
>
> Oskar Sandberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had almost missed your pessimism. Technically Ian moderates the
list, but h
David Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The patch is attached. Whoever is moderating can I guess delete the
> message that's still pending.
According to Ian Clarke, the moderator is Mr. Dev Null.
--
Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:51:39PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
> > doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
> > demonstrate this, apply
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:51:39PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
> doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
> demonstrate this, apply the patch and then go to TFE. I will apply a
> patch, if it works.
The reason the metadata patch hasn't been applied to CVS is that it
doesn't work. It produces Network Error's on most pages/images. To
demonstrate this, apply the patch and then go to TFE. I will apply a
patch, if it works.
--
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:12:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The one that hasn't come through yet because it's *waiting for
> > moderator approval* :)
> Um, send it to me then.
The patch is attached. Whoever is moderating can I guess delete the
message that's still pending.
--
David
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:12:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The one that hasn't come through yet because it's *waiting for
> > moderator approval* :)
> Um, send it to me then.
The patch is attached. Whoever is moderating can I guess delete the
message that's still pending.
--
David
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> Who does the moderation of the mailing list?
Nobody.
--
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:46:09PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > > Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> > > list earlier, but I used
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
> back saying that it's pending moderator approval. Are outside posts
> that big of a problem at
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
> back saying that it's pending moderator approval. Are outside posts
> that big of a problem at
Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
back saying that it's pending moderator approval. Are outside posts
that big of a problem at this point?
Anyway, I would really appreciate it if that patch or so
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> > list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
> > back saying that it's
big attachments are sent to moderation to keep traffic bandwidth down
aparently.
David Allen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
> > Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
> > list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
> > back saying that it's
Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I sent a patch to the
list earlier, but I used the wrong email address so I got a message
back saying that it's pending moderator approval. Are outside posts
that big of a problem at this point?
Anyway, I would really appreciate it if that patch or so
big attachments are sent to moderation to keep traffic bandwidth down
aparently.
David Allen wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:27:03AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:50:57PM -0400, David Allen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Who does the moderation of the mailing list? I
Bill Trost wrote:
> Open questions:
>
> 1. Where does the "real" MIMEType of the message go? Does the
> entire message itself constitute a message with its own headers,
> or can all the headers of the multipart message be included as
> part of part 1's headers?
>
> 2. Are the parts encrypted ind
> OK, but...why bother with "PublcMetadata" (or "Metadata.Public" if you
> want to be truly anal)? It's not clear that it adds anything. I can
> tell it's public -- it's not encrypted. Likewise, private metadata is
> encrypted and therefore, well, private. (I assume the word "Metadata"
> tells
Brandon writes:
Here is my version of
the proposal, mixing the truly agreed upon things with my ideas on the
subject.
There is a field containing public, plaintext metadata, in the dotted
field format.
PublicMetadata.Expires=10/26/2002
PublicMetadata.HeaderLengt
45 matches
Mail list logo
