[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Simon Porter
at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Dave Hooper Sent: 01 January 2003 23:21 To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter > > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it > > seems to be the worst from a "people complai

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:21:29PM -, Dave Hooper wrote: > > > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, > it > > > seems to be the worst from a "people complaining that freenet is > useless" > > > standpoint. :) > > > > Why? > > Because: > "* No CSS support.

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Dave Hooper
> > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it > > seems to be the worst from a "people complaining that freenet is useless" > > standpoint. :) > > Why? Because: "* No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked. Including inline style. * ?date= links, and "?"'s in checked

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:08:47PM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote: > On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:45 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development > > branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by > > parsing the

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by parsing the whole HTML file and only passing along tags it understands; this should be much safer, and allows us to do things like rewriting web URLs to

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:45 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development > branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by > parsing the whole HTML file and only passing along tags it understands; > this should

[freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by parsing the whole HTML file and only passing along tags it understands; this should be much safer, and allows us to do things like rewriting web URLs to

Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:45 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by parsing the whole HTML file and only passing along tags it understands; this should be

Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:08:47PM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote: On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:45 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: The first version of the new anonymity filter is now in the development branch of CVS (build 631). It seems to more or less work. It works by parsing the whole HTML

Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Dave Hooper
While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it seems to be the worst from a people complaining that freenet is useless standpoint. :) Why? Because: * No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked. Including inline style. * ?date= links, and ?'s in checked links, are

Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:21:29PM -, Dave Hooper wrote: While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it seems to be the worst from a people complaining that freenet is useless standpoint. :) Why? Because: * No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked.

RE: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter

2003-01-01 Thread Simon Porter
Of Dave Hooper Sent: 01 January 2003 23:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] New Anonymity Filter While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, it seems to be the worst from a people complaining that freenet is useless standpoint. :) Why? Because