Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Salah Coronya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 J wrote: | | I disagree. Exactly ZERO development effort should be put into this. ~ Find a | build that works well in the 5xxx series and stick with that IMO. | Then it probably should be 5028. ~From build 5015-5020, insert were broken (you could ins

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread J
Quoting Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Toad spake thusly: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to > > > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Toad spake thusly: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to > > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running > > the prod build Woohoo! Very glad to

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread mids
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:09:45AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Todd Walton wrote: > >On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose > >>the best option available to us. > >So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide. > > Well, 5028 is t

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On October 07, 2003 02:52 pm, Toad wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:47:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > [cut] > > > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl > > > modes which the user can cho

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Toad
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:47:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > [cut] > > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl > > modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally with > > a ni

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread mids
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > [cut] > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl > modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally with > a nice check box on the installation wizard, not one of those ugly > modal dial

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Ian Clarke
Todd Walton wrote: On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose the best option available to us. So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide. Well, 5028 is the obvious choice simply because it is more recent. Ian. __

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Todd Walton
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote: > Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose > the best option available to us. So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide. -todd ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freene

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Ian Clarke
Toad wrote: * The stable branch should be reverted to build 692 Build 692 is from the UNSTABLE branch. And it probably does not include a certain anon filter bugfix. Has anyone actually tried running a 50 node network of 5028's only? I suspect it would work reasonably well! Ok, I only suggested 69

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Toad
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Ok, what we need: > > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running > the prod build > > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod a

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Ian Clarke
Ok, what we need: * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running the prod build * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally

Re: [freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Toad
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:33:23AM -0700, Reskill wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is mainly directed at Ian. The Production Network appears > to be running well on 692 and I would like to see freenetproject.org Umm, could you please try 5028? It makes very little sense to maintain so many different

[freenet-dev] Official status of Production Network as part of the Freenet Project?

2003-10-07 Thread Reskill
Hi, I guess this is mainly directed at Ian. The Production Network appears to be running well on 692 and I would like to see freenetproject.org endorse this move and make it more "official" - hosting the proper software etc for those who want to use it. The update script would, I guess, also need