-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J wrote:
|
| I disagree. Exactly ZERO development effort should be put into this.
~ Find a
| build that works well in the 5xxx series and stick with that IMO.
|
Then it probably should be 5028.
~From build 5015-5020, insert were broken (you could ins
Quoting Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to
> > > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to
> > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running
> > the prod build
Woohoo! Very glad to
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:09:45AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Todd Walton wrote:
> >On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >>Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose
> >>the best option available to us.
> >So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide.
>
> Well, 5028 is t
On October 07, 2003 02:52 pm, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:47:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > [cut]
> > > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl
> > > modes which the user can cho
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:47:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > [cut]
> > * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl
> > modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally with
> > a ni
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> [cut]
> * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl
> modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally with
> a nice check box on the installation wizard, not one of those ugly
> modal dial
Todd Walton wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose
the best option available to us.
So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide.
Well, 5028 is the obvious choice simply because it is more recent.
Ian.
__
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose
> the best option available to us.
So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide.
-todd
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freene
Toad wrote:
* The stable branch should be reverted to build 692
Build 692 is from the UNSTABLE branch. And it probably does not include
a certain anon filter bugfix. Has anyone actually tried running a 50
node network of 5028's only? I suspect it would work reasonably well!
Ok, I only suggested 69
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, what we need:
>
> * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to
> dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running
> the prod build
>
> * A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod a
Ok, what we need:
* A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to
dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running
the prod build
* A version of the Windows installer that supports both Prod and Devl
modes which the user can choose between on installation (ideally
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:33:23AM -0700, Reskill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess this is mainly directed at Ian. The Production Network appears
> to be running well on 692 and I would like to see freenetproject.org
Umm, could you please try 5028? It makes very little sense to maintain
so many different
Hi,
I guess this is mainly directed at Ian. The Production Network appears
to be running well on 692 and I would like to see freenetproject.org
endorse this move and make it more "official" - hosting the proper software
etc for those who want to use it. The update script would, I guess, also
need
14 matches
Mail list logo