[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Zero3
Luke771 skrev: > As a translator, I don't see the usefulness of a 'string freeze time'. > > As a translator, I see great usefulness of string freeze periods. However, regarding Freenet I agree that it wouldn't be a good idea besides major releases. We probably can't afford to delay releases by

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Zero3
Luke771 skrev: > As a translator, I don't see the usefulness of a 'string freeze time'. > > As a translator, I see great usefulness of string freeze periods. However, regarding Freenet I agree that it wouldn't be a good idea besides major releases. We probably can't afford to delay releases by

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Luke771
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:00:29 +0800 "Daniel Cheng" wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luke771 wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + > > NextGen$ wrote: > > > >> * Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > >> > >> > Hi List, > >> > > >> > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we ca

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luke771 wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + > NextGen$ wrote: > >> * Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: >> >> > Hi List, >> > >> > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String >> > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this p

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Cooo .
At this time I do not think that a string freeze is of any importance before build releases. When it comes to point releases (from 0.7 to 0.8) it might be a good idea though. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cheng" To: "Freenet Development" Subject: [freen

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Cooo .
At this time I do not think that a string freeze is of any importance before build releases. When it comes to point releases (from 0.7 to 0.8) it might be a good idea though. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cheng" To: "Freenet Development" Subject: [freen

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Luke771
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + NextGen$ wrote: > * Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > > > Hi List, > > > > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String > > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n > > string are added or changed. This can m

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-04 Thread Luke771
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:00:29 +0800 "Daniel Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luke771 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + > > NextGen$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> * Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > >> >

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread NextGen$
* Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > Hi List, > > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n > string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and > make sure the l10n is always up

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luke771 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + > NextGen$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: >> >> > Hi List, >> > >> > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String >>

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread Luke771
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:31 + NextGen$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > > > Hi List, > > > > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String > > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n > > s

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:20 PM, NextGen$ wrote: > * Daniel Cheng [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > >> Hi List, >> >> The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String >> freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n >> string are added or changed. This can make transl

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:20 PM, NextGen$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > >> Hi List, >> >> The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String >> freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n >> string are

Re: [freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-03 Thread NextGen$
* Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:52:20]: > Hi List, > > The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String > freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n > string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and > make sure the

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Cheng
Hi List, The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and make sure the l10n is always up to date. Any idea? Regards, Daniel Cheng (SDiZ)

[freenet-dev] RFC: "String Freeze" period before releaseing

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Cheng
Hi List, The Chinese translator (yongjhen) asked if we can make a "String freeze" period before releasing a build. During this period, no l10n string are added or changed. This can make translator's job easier and make sure the l10n is always up to date. Any idea? Regards, Daniel Cheng (SDiZ) __