[freenet-dev] Re: FCPTools issues; Was: Newbie question: what's "PAgM" for?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 August 2002 15:57 pm, Dan Merillat wrote: > And yes, the entire fcptools suite could use a reflow. I've worked > on bits of it but havn't finished. Original design flaws are > evident: fcpput and fcpputsplit, WHY? WHY!?!? Also, fcpget w

[freenet-dev] Re: FCPTools issues; Was: Newbie question: what's "PAgM" for?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 August 2002 15:57 pm, Dan Merillat wrote: > And yes, the entire fcptools suite could use a reflow. I've worked > on bits of it but havn't finished. Original design flaws are > evident: fcpput and fcpputsplit, WHY? WHY!?!? Also, fcpget