Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Some Guy
If the Freenet Project wants funding from some organization, it's going to have to come from someone who's ideology is in something where Freenet would help. Some organization like: Amnesty International: http://www.amnesty.org/ http://www.amnestyusa.org/ Or Radio Free

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Nick Tarleton
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 08:34 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: On Tuesday 12 August 2003 06:39 pm, Tracy R Reed wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:28:22PM -0700, pineapple spake thusly: distributed nature. It's possible that IBM management is not aware of the Freenet Project and would be

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Gordan
On Wednesday 13 Aug 2003 17:24, Some Guy wrote: Maybe we can get some pron company to setup a pron freesite with clips of thier crap and run a couple nodes. Maybe they'd even donate some money. They'd have no image problems to worry about. The Pron industry is one of the most profitable

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:28:22PM -0700, pineapple spake thusly: distributed nature. It's possible that IBM management is not aware of the Freenet Project and would be interested in learning about the project and supporting it financially. Unless you get very lucky any company putting money

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Kaitchuck
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 06:39 pm, Tracy R Reed wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:28:22PM -0700, pineapple spake thusly: distributed nature. It's possible that IBM management is not aware of the Freenet Project and would be interested in learning about the project and supporting it

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Todd Walton
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, pineapple wrote: I know this may sound funny, but did you try IBM? Reality check: *No* company of any size is going to give money to Freenet. They're going to say, Stay away from my ten-foot pole! Don't touch it! Good reasons to stay away from Freenet: 1) It's lousy

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Menno Jonkers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pineapple wrote: | I know this may sound funny, but did you try IBM? I think the anarchistic nature of Freenet and the general association of Freenet with kiddie porn make it way too tricky for any commercial company to be associated with. But hey,

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Todd Walton
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: A better idea, would be to setup a web hosting provider. Offer people unlimited storage and X amount of bandwidth for Y dollars per month. Then any websight can store any static content (all their downloads) on Freenet. You could insert each

[freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Newsbite
On Wednesday 13 Aug 2003 17:24, Some Guy wrote: Maybe we can get some pron company to setup a pron freesite with clips of thier crap and run a couple nodes. Maybe they'd even donate some money. They'd have no "image" problems to worry about. The Pron industry is one of the most

[freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:09:52PM +0200, Newsbite wrote: I suggested then, that it might be a good idea to seek out additional sponsors, be it non-profit organisations, or even commercial compagnies. I have investigated various non-profs that might give us grants - however it never

[freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread pineapple
of the Freenet Project and would be interested in learning about the project and supporting it financially. - Original Message - From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Newsbite [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:09 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Emanuele Olivetti
And what about Sun? Current freenet is Sun JVM dependent; I know the problem that currently Kaffe doesn't work for freenet (and I think it should be a major goal for the future), but this situation now can help reaching Sun Microsystem. Cheers,

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding -Pron

2003-08-14 Thread Some Guy
I just wish there was something that didn't require much initial investment. Something we commonfolk could do. -todd I think some of you guys have got the wrong idea about my suggestion. We don't want to set up webservers to pull content from freenet. I don't think we want to have them

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Kaitchuck
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 11:33 am, Gordan wrote: On Wednesday 13 Aug 2003 17:24, Some Guy wrote: Maybe we can get some pron company to setup a pron freesite with clips of thier crap and run a couple nodes. Maybe they'd even donate some money. They'd have no image problems to worry

[freenet-dev] Re: funding

2003-08-14 Thread zbalevsk
We could play the jre game. If we can prove that fred runs substantially better on [sun|ibm] jre as opposed to [ibm|sun] jre we could make a deal with the respective company to use fred as example in their publicity wars. And what about Sun? Current freenet is Sun JVM dependent; I know the