> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
> > With the protocol branch, does it make sense to generate a new
> > seednodes.ref file for stable 5046. On Saturday I put 5046
>
> Umm, so reseed it. The seednodes file is updated constantl
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
> With the protocol branch, does it make sense to generate a new
> seednodes.ref file for stable 5046. On Saturday I put 5046
> on a machine but it is still crawling along. A new seednodes
> file would make sense to jump start it.
IL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:27 AM
Subject: [freenet-dev] Stable 5046 seednodes.ref
> With the protocol branch, does it make sense to generate a new
> seednodes.ref file for stable 5046. On Saturday I put 5046
> on a machine but it is s
With the protocol branch, does it make sense to generate a new
seednodes.ref file for stable 5046. On Saturday I put 5046
on a machine but it is still crawling along. A new seednodes
file would make sense to jump start it. As it stands, all it
is doing is sending Identify and QueryRejected messa
