Hi all,
Just as a note that may help, on the visibility I would use verbs instead
of yes/no (ex. visible/hidden as I did on
http://freenet.makdisse.com/apps/connectionsfriends).
What is not on this draft, but should be on the final version is a help
text explaining the implications of each
Sorry about the last email, just now I realize that you meant the 'add
friend wizard'. In this case yes/no makes total sense because it comes as
an answer (http://freenet.makdisse.com/apps/addfriend3)
Sorry about the confusion.
_mak
On 31 March 2014 15:11, Paulo Makdisse pa...@makdisse.com
On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Hi,
misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for
friends, so we now have to take a decision.
Which do you think is the most appropriate option for each one:
trust:
- HIGH
- NORMAL
- LOW
visibility (keep in mind
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Hi,
misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for
friends, so we now have to take a decision.
Which do you think is the most
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On 31/03/14 16:54, Nicolas Hernandez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Hi,
misaakidis wants to
On 31/03/14 17:24, Nicolas Hernandez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On 31/03/14 16:54, Nicolas Hernandez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne
Am Montag, 31. März 2014, 15:52:20 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
As identified at CTS4, it is *our* job to define the default value for
that, because new users have no chance of understanding the
implications of taking either choice.
It is? How are we supposed to know the risk tolerance / risk
Am Montag, 31. März 2014, 15:52:20 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
It is? How are we supposed to know the risk tolerance / risk profile of
every single user?
What is the danger of saying HIGH trust?
What is the added safety I get when saying LOW trust?
What is the danger of saying YES (FOAF)?
Can
On 31/03/14 21:13, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Montag, 31. März 2014, 15:52:20 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
It is? How are we supposed to know the risk tolerance / risk profile of
every single user?
What is the danger of saying HIGH trust?
We might do aggressive things like sharing bloom
