Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-23 Thread tkaitchuck
Keys where? In the data store, just sitting there? Or actualy being requested? ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl ___ Devl mailing list

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-21 Thread Tom Kaitchuck
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:36 pm, Tracy R Reed wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard spake thusly: I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space specialisation. NGR is trying to route quickly, all un-overload are Yep. speed. Don't know how

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-21 Thread Toad
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:36 pm, Tracy R Reed wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard spake thusly: I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space specialisation. NGR is trying to

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-21 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly: How are you measuring specialization? If you are looking at your data store than I would say you never were specialized. However ether way, you aren't now. So, yes, we should do whatever we can to encourage this. IE: Why

RE: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-19 Thread Niklas Bergh
I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space specialisation. NGR is trying to route quickly, all un-overload are quick, get the traffic, route to each other, overload, etc. If this is the case we should try to reduce QRs as much as possible - remove QR based on

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-19 Thread Some Guy
--- Tracy R Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard spake thusly: speed. Don't know how to kick start it out of the current state though. The only other way I can think of at the moment is nodes having (semi)strict self key space

[freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-18 Thread Jonathan Howard
Not seen this suggested so I'll post what I'm thinking. How about replacing the current pDNFs with a new stat that when data is found promotes that node and demotes (by some fraction) all others, (for the given key area.) This will eliminate all the il/legitimate DNF problems. I've deleted the

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-18 Thread Toad
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard wrote: Not seen this suggested so I'll post what I'm thinking. How about replacing the current pDNFs with a new stat that when data is found promotes that node and demotes (by some fraction) all others, (for the given key area.) This

Re: [freenet-dev] estimate DNF - real DF

2003-11-18 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard spake thusly: I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space specialisation. NGR is trying to route quickly, all un-overload are Yep. speed. Don't know how to kick start it out of the current state though. The only