From:
> This causes requests to fail, so people try to fix it
> by inserting onto more nodes, thereby making the problem worse.
Hmmm, so if 'multiple insertion points' would cause worse problems for the
network...
Maybe an idea might be to place occasional FNP requests to different random
nodes,
>From "David McNab"
>Thinking left field, the user can be asked to choose a name, then that name
>is sent to inform.php with a "?name=myhostname" arg appended to the
>inform.php req. This way, inform.php could also serve as a kind of 'dynamic
>IP' sevice.
>If one has a static IP or DNS hostname,
> Do we even have 100 nodes on the network?
Now I'm _really_ getting worried.
As I was tossing and turning in bed earlier tonight, contemplating this
problem, I thought that the issue might be the opposite - thousands of
nodes.
I realise I'm still painfully ignorant of Freenet's topology
But I w
>From "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Thinking left field, the user can be asked to choose a name, then that name
>is sent to inform.php with a "?name=myhostname" arg appended to the
>inform.php req. This way, inform.php could also serve as a kind of 'dynamic
>IP' sevice.
>If one has a static
"Houston, we have a problem..."
Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at present.
I was unaware of the issues till I created a new Windows installation on a
fresh partition, and installed a new Freenet on it.
While I'm running Freenet from this Windows partition, my
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This causes requests to fail, so people try to fix it
> by inserting onto more nodes, thereby making the problem worse.
Hmmm, so if 'multiple insertion points' would cause worse problems for the
network...
Maybe an idea might be to place occasional FNP requests to diff
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:44:50AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > Do we even have 100 nodes on the network?
>
> Now I'm _really_ getting worried.
Well, I think that Fred is working, so clearly we do (it's possible to
have 100 htl go by on a smaller network because of backtracking, but
still). The
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at present.
>
> I was unaware of the issues till I created a new Windows installation on a
> fresh partition, and installed a new
On Thursday 19 April 2001 06:37, David wrote:
> > "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at
> present.
This isn't the way things look in my world. It seems that reliability is
actually getting better. I can find most *new* files mo
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at present.
I have observed the opposite. I suspect that the problem may be that
your Freenet node will only become efficient at f
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at present.
I have observed the opposite. I suspect that the problem may be that
your Freenet node will only become efficient at
ssage-ID: <3ADF0FC1.CAB29EAD at drjava.de>
From: Stefan Reich
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: devl at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Crisis - Freenet Reliability and Performance
References: <002a01c0c8bc$af7f0d40$eb
On Thursday 19 April 2001 06:37, David wrote:
> > "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at
> present.
This isn't the way things look in my world. It seems that reliability is
actually getting better. I can find most *new* files m
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:44:50AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > Do we even have 100 nodes on the network?
>
> Now I'm _really_ getting worried.
Well, I think that Fred is working, so clearly we do (it's possible to
have 100 htl go by on a smaller network because of backtracking, but
still). The
What I'm wondering in this context is... how can we be sure that Freenet isn't
fragmented? A few months ago, Gnutella suffered from fragmentation so badly that
it was virtually unusable. The main problem was de-facto fragmentation caused by
nodes with way too little bandwidth.
For Gnutella, it on
As long as everyone keeps inserting everything onto all nodes, the Freenet
search algorithm won't work. There will be no way to follow a path to a
particular node where the data is stored, if all nodes have approximately
the same data. This causes requests to fail, so people try to fix it
by ins
y.
Cheers
David
- Original Message -
From: "Oskar Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 2:53 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Crisis - Freenet Reliability and Performance
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> "Houston, we have a problem..."
>
> Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at present.
>
> I was unaware of the issues till I created a new Windows installation on a fresh
>partition, and installed a new
"Houston, we have a problem..."
Freenet's reliability and performance have
been suffering terribly at present.
I was unaware of the issues till I created a new
Windows installation on a fresh partition, and installed a new Freenet on
it.
While I'm running Freenet from this Windows
partit
20 matches
Mail list logo
