Dave Hooper schrieb:
> > > 3) Daves freenet.exe will signal an error on startup when using the CLI
> > > node (Freenet.node.Node) while the graphical node (node.gui.GUINode)
> > > works fine. *He* will have to fix this, as he added some complicated
> > > stuff (multiple threads etc...) to my simple
Right, in CVS is now an updated source and binary for freenet.exe. It reads
"fservecli" from flaunch.ini instead of "fserve" as suggested. I've also
updated the flaunch.ini file in CVS to reflect this, ready for the next
release
The non-GUI node does indeed use less RAM. Windows users will be ab
Dave Hooper schrieb:
> > > 3) Daves freenet.exe will signal an error on startup when using the CLI
> > > node (Freenet.node.Node) while the graphical node (node.gui.GUINode)
> > > works fine. *He* will have to fix this, as he added some complicated
> > > stuff (multiple threads etc...) to my simpl
for devl at freenetproject.org; Thu, 10 May 2001 00:31:45 +0100
Message-ID: <000a01c0d8e0$3040c940$0b00a8c0 at badsector0>
From: "Dave Hooper"
To:
References: <3AF84B19.69004F5 at SSpaeth.de> <20010508183240.B21013 at
freenetproject.org> <00b801c0d8d4$e
How come I never got the original of this? Was it sent to a different
freenet mailing list than this one (it's the only one I'm subbed to
unfortunately).
> you should announce these things to the web mailing list so that the
> translators can do their thing.
>
> Ian.
> I am still not 100% happy
Right, in CVS is now an updated source and binary for freenet.exe. It reads
"fservecli" from flaunch.ini instead of "fserve" as suggested. I've also
updated the flaunch.ini file in CVS to reflect this, ready for the next
release
The non-GUI node does indeed use less RAM. Windows users will be a
> > 2) Dave's implementation reads the entry "fserve" in FLaunch.ini which
> > starts the graphical Node invisibly and thus wastes RAM. The solution
> > will be to have an entry fserveCLI (or similar which is read instead).
> > This is feasible
>
> Ok, Makes sense. I'll have to have a play to see
How come I never got the original of this? Was it sent to a different
freenet mailing list than this one (it's the only one I'm subbed to
unfortunately).
> you should announce these things to the web mailing list so that the
> translators can do their thing.
>
> Ian.
> I am still not 100% happ
OK, here is the deal:
http://download.sourceforge.net/freenet/Freenet_setup0.3.9.1-1.exe is
out (sorry for introducing yet another minor number, but as nothing in
the code changed I did not want to release 0.3.9.2).
I changed the download link on the English webpage. Do I have to change
them in a
you should announce these things to the web mailing list so that the
translators can do their thing.
Ian.
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:38:01PM +0200, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> OK, here is the deal:
> http://download.sourceforge.net/freenet/Freenet_setup0.3.9.1-1.exe is
> out (sorry for introducing y
you should announce these things to the web mailing list so that the
translators can do their thing.
Ian.
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:38:01PM +0200, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> OK, here is the deal:
> http://download.sourceforge.net/freenet/Freenet_setup0.3.9.1-1.exe is
> out (sorry for introducing
OK, here is the deal:
http://download.sourceforge.net/freenet/Freenet_setup0.3.9.1-1.exe is
out (sorry for introducing yet another minor number, but as nothing in
the code changed I did not want to release 0.3.9.2).
I changed the download link on the English webpage. Do I have to change
them in
12 matches
Mail list logo
