Re: Ouch was Re: [freenet-dev] Additional ways to reduce load aside from QR.

2003-11-20 Thread Ken Corson
Toad wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I do now. However, it is a way that a node could hurt the network without being proportionately punished for it in the estimators - if I reinstate it, then nodes that QR with HTL 0, killing

Re: Ouch was Re: [freenet-dev] Additional ways to reduce load aside from QR.

2003-11-20 Thread Toad
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I do now. However, it is a way that a node could hurt the network > > without being proportionately punished for it in the estimators - if I > > reinstate it, then nodes that QR with HTL 0, kil

Re: Ouch was Re: [freenet-dev] Additional ways to reduce load aside from QR.

2003-11-20 Thread Edgar Friendly
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do now. However, it is a way that a node could hurt the network > without being proportionately punished for it in the estimators - if I > reinstate it, then nodes that QR with HTL 0, killing the request, will be > treated the same as nodes that QR at any other

Ouch was Re: [freenet-dev] Additional ways to reduce load aside from QR.

2003-11-17 Thread Toad
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:45:59AM +, Toad wrote: > > > QueryRejected.java: > > This paragraph is confusing and poorly worded; a better way of saying > > what was intended is: > > > > * This message is sent by a node that cannot continue the request for > > * a piece of data. If recieved by