Re: Proper form for a public FMS outproxy?

2019-07-21 Thread yanmaani
On 2019-07-21 08:11, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: yanma...@cock.li writes: On 2019-07-20 07:59, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: yanma...@cock.li writes: Frontends would be disposable and dime-a-dozen To get to this situations, you must make it very, very easy to host them. This might be a major

Re: Proper form for a public FMS outproxy?

2019-07-21 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
yanma...@cock.li writes: > On 2019-07-20 07:59, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi, >> >> yanma...@cock.li writes: >> >>> Now, my idea is this: You set up a public (onion or clearnet) frontend >>> where you can make and read posts, with its back-end being FMS. >> … >>> Frontends would be

Re: Proper form for a public FMS outproxy?

2019-07-20 Thread yanmaani
On 2019-07-20 07:59, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Hi, yanma...@cock.li writes: Now, my idea is this: You set up a public (onion or clearnet) frontend where you can make and read posts, with its back-end being FMS. … Frontends would be disposable and dime-a-dozen; a front-end with too To

Re: Proper form for a public FMS outproxy?

2019-07-20 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi, yanma...@cock.li writes: > Now, my idea is this: You set up a public (onion or clearnet) frontend > where you can make and read posts, with its back-end being FMS. … > Frontends would be disposable and dime-a-dozen; a front-end with too To get to this situations, you must make it very, very

Proper form for a public FMS outproxy?

2019-07-19 Thread yanmaani
Hi, There's a lot of projects aiming to create decentralized forums. One of them is, as you know, FMS. FMS has the obvious downside of having to install Freenet, along with the various Web of Trust hassle. Another one was Usenet. And a later project following the same idea, NNTPchan.