Hi Paul,
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 19:05, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 19:03, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> For me this is already the job of the uix we use for application panel
>> so I don't really see the point of adding something else.
>
> Well, that would be a job for extensions
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 19:03, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> This does not make any sense at general Extension level.
>
> Could be custom metadata that apply to XAR extensions. Since that only
> make sense for XAR extensions I would prefer to have this be
> implemented as a xobject as usual.
Yes, it
On 14 Oct 2016, at 19:03, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> For me this is already the job of the uix we use for application panel
> so I don't really see the point of adding something else.
Well, that would be a job for extensions.xwiki.org:
- prioritise entry-points in search results
- display appropri
This does not make any sense at general Extension level.
Could be custom metadata that apply to XAR extensions. Since that only
make sense for XAR extensions I would prefer to have this be
implemented as a xobject as usual.
For me this is already the job of the uix we use for application panel
so
Hi devs,
Problem
===
We have 2 issues right now when installing an extension in XWiki:
1) It’s not clear where is the entry point of that extension.
- Example1: an app that is only for admins and only has a ConfigurableClass
- Example2: an app that provides a macro and doesn’t have a UI
2)
Hi devs,
After discussing with XWiki SAS internally here’s a list of items that’s
interesting to fix for XWiki SAS (in that order, from top to bottom) from now
till end of the year (i.e. 8.4.x).
The goal is to try to take as many issues as possible from this list, starting
from top to bottom.
+1 for your proposal until we have a better solution. I would avoid comment tab
if ever possible, since it increase the inconveniences already explained. I
agree with almost all other comments, but until we have time for something
better, this proposal would be a first improvement. We should jus
Hi devs,
There was a mistake that I made in the announcement of this week's BFD:
it's #122 and not #121.
See the results in the blogpost:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Bug+Fixing+Day+122.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Alexandru Cotiuga <
alexandru.coti...@xwiki.com> w
+1 to move issue to a new jira project and duplicate those that
reproduce in the new WYSIWYG
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If we retire it to contrib, then indeed, it needs its own jira project and
> the existing opened issues (bugs/improvements/etc) need to be m
9 matches
Mail list logo
