Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
noobie wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
int[] arr = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];
auto squares = map!(a * a)(arr);
arr[] = [ 5, 6, 7, 8 ];
Now iterating squares will see different numbers than the original ones.
Okay, what is the problem in maintaining a
Interesting. (Link?)
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=e8fc97ba090537g3ce284b3m63f6fe2c1543...@mail.gmail.comforum_name=gdalgorithms-list
I think Bill was referring to Tom Forsyth's post in that thread.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Dunno. According to SPJ, automatically parallelizing map was a failed
experiment in Haskell. Explicit parallelizing a la pmap seems to be
the way to go.
Source? I think as processors grow in number, automatic
Walter Bright wrote:
downs wrote:
Walter: I'm certain that you thought changing the behavior of
volatile was a good idea at the time, ill-defined though it was, but
let me assure you, the act left a gaping hole in the language.
You are using the GDC back end, and I don't know what it does
Benji Smith wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
John Reimer terminal.n...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:28b70f8c119528cb42154f5d1...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
But, of course, adjectives (just like direct/indirect objects) are
themselves nouns.
Umm... May I make a little correction
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'll wait for bearophile to tell if he feels he
hasn't gotten the credit he believes he deserves before I answer this
particular point.
I'm having a bad week for matters unrelated to D. You are doing lot of work for
D, so don't worry for me. I was just a bit sad seeing
On 2009-01-13 10:27:10 +0100, Robert Fraser fraseroftheni...@gmail.com said:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Dunno. According to SPJ, automatically parallelizing map was a failed
experiment in Haskell. Explicit parallelizing a la pmap seems to be
Hello Christopher,
Benji Smith wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
John Reimer terminal.n...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:28b70f8c119528cb42154f5d1...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
But, of course, adjectives (just like direct/indirect objects)
are themselves nouns.
Umm... May I
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'll wait for bearophile to tell if he feels he hasn't gotten the
credit he believes he deserves before I answer this particular
point.
I'm having a bad week for matters unrelated to D. You are doing lot
of work for D, so don't worry for me. I was just a
So I was listening to the discussion about opApply in the lazy thread.
Somebody mentioned that opApply would be better if we could eliminate
the int return code.
So I thought, well, you could make the unusual situations (return,
break, etc.) exceptions, but that would be too slow...
Then I
Hello Russell,
The idea here is that if you had return type 'exception', then
exceptions coming out of that function would be returned as return
values rather than thrown with the ordinary mechanism.
[...]
Thoughts?
An interesting idea. Might be of particular use if you have a function (or
== Quote from Russell Lewis (webmas...@villagersonline.com)'s article
So I was listening to the discussion about opApply in the lazy thread.
Somebody mentioned that opApply would be better if we could eliminate
the int return code.
So I thought, well, you could make the unusual situations
Adam D. Ruppe Wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:15:45AM -0500, Claus D. Volko wrote:
Thanks for your answer. It sounds plausible to me. Do you know how to
manually cause a flush? I've found this code snippet:
fflush(stdout);
That should do it and is imported in std.stdio;
I've tried
Claus D. Volko wrote
Adam D. Ruppe Wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:15:45AM -0500, Claus D. Volko wrote:
Thanks for your answer. It sounds plausible to me. Do you know how to
manually cause a flush? I've found this code snippet:
fflush(stdout);
That should do it and is imported in
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'll wait for bearophile to tell if he feels he hasn't gotten the
credit he believes he deserves before I answer this particular
point.
I'm having a bad week for matters unrelated to D. You are doing lot
of work for
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Point #3 is on the mark. A URL to quality documentstion is worth 100 posts
declaring the superiority of dlibs.
A URL to browseable source wouldn't hurt either.
Given how much you promote your library here, it's
Reply to Sergey,
Consider following definition:
|class Node
|{
|union
|{
|protected Rect _rect;
|const struct
|{
|short x, y;
|ushort width, height;
|}
|}
|setRect(...) { ... }
|}
The point is to have a readonly view of
On 1/14/2009 2:18 AM, BCS wrote:
cost = you can't chnage it
invariant = Will not change at all
...
Setting it in a decleration my put it in read only memeory or even hard
code it into expressions
Well this is usually oblivious, but not in case of union. Which might be
a little bit
Christian Kamm wrote:
With the features of D2 you can get pretty close to implementing scope
classes as a template struct:
private final class PlacementNewClass(T) : T
{
// forward constructors here!
new(uint size, byte[__traits(classInstanceSize, PlacementNewClass)] mem) {
return mem;
Really stupid question from a total SVN noob: I uploaded some docs to SVN for
a dsource project, and linked to them via the project wiki. When I follow the
link to the docs, I get an HTML forbidden error. How do I change the
permissions in that SVN directory to make the docs viewable as plain
Just curious, why doesn't D, and why don't more statically typed languages in
general, support overload by return type? I haven't exactly thought through
all the pros and cons, but at first glance it seems like an incredibly useful
thing. What's the catch that I'm missing?
Hello dsimcha,
Really stupid question from a total SVN noob: I uploaded some docs to
SVN for a dsource project, and linked to them via the project wiki.
When I follow the link to the docs, I get an HTML forbidden error.
How do I change the permissions in that SVN directory to make the docs
Hello dsimcha,
Just curious, why doesn't D, and why don't more statically typed
languages in general, support overload by return type? I haven't
exactly thought through all the pros and cons, but at first glance it
seems like an incredibly useful thing. What's the catch that I'm
missing?
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:31:53 +1300, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just curious, why doesn't D, and why don't more statically typed
languages in
general, support overload by return type? I haven't exactly thought
through
all the pros and cons, but at first glance it seems like an
BTW: Is there any Date.Format(-mm-dd) function?
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:27:40 +0100, Qian Xu wrote:
Hi All,
I am fighting with date time conversion and have a problem right now:
I want to convert a local timestamp to UTC timestamp.
So I have to get the time zone information.
However in some countries (ie. German, US), the offset is not
Qian Xu wrote:
BTW: Is there any Date.Format(-mm-dd) function?
Not in Phobos. But there is such a thing in my utility library:
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d/sutil/
Stewart.
Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro wrote
Is there any good reason why the following code doesn't work?
The function foo requires as its argument a delegate that
receives a B. This means that, because of the type soundness
of the D language, the delegate will only be called with instances
of B. Now, why
Thanks.It works now.
Regards,
Sam
29 matches
Mail list logo
