Michel Fortin Wrote:
is there still a reason for
it to require an empty parenthesis?
It's a function :)
Does someone has some need for Ternary Search Trees into Phobos (for D1. And
eventually later for D2 too)?
TSTs allow to find keys, key prefixes, or even keys with holes. Keys are arrays
of T, where T is the template type.
They can be designed to store the keys alone, or as an associative data
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Christopher Wright, el 12 de abril a las 17:54 me escribiste:
Absolutely. When writing parallel code to do large scale data mining in D, the
lack of precision and multithreaded allocation are real killers. My interests
are, in order of importance:
1. Being able to
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
snip
Such mood was always in the spec: AlignAttribute is ignored when
applied to declarations that are not structs or struct members.
I never saw that before. So it doesn't work for class members?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/class.html
The D
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:44:25 +0400, Tomas Lindquist Olsen
tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Frits van Bommel
fvbom...@remwovexcapss.nl wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
Stewart Gordon Wrote:
At the moment, the problem seems to be that the compiler is silently
ignoring
I came upon realization that you can already create properties
accepting various operators in D, using a template mixin. The only
missing part is getting the value without a getter function.
struct Z
{
int value2Cache;
template Property()
{
int
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-04-12 11:09:51 -0400, Lars Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet said:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
I think isInfinite!() should be called isInfiniteRange!(). The
current name is, in my opinion, too general.
I'm
Michel Fortin wrote:
I disagree. How adding the is it disambiguate between the predicate
and the assertion? x.isBounded reads more like x is bounded (the
assertion) than is x bounded (the predicate).
Method syntax usually leads to incorrect word order. a.b(c), should
not be read as a does b
Sean Kelly wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
But right now gc_malloc() doesn't take any TypeInfo argument. I can't see
where I can get the TypeInfo in the first place =/
The call would have to be modified. Right now the best you can do is
pass BlkAttr.NO_SCAN. And storing a pointer per block
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
...
So essentially we're looking at a symbolic approach - a resumable range
would need to advertise that. I've used that for isSorted too, and it
works pretty well.
The remaining question is one of defaults - are most ranges resumable or
bearophile wrote:
Benji Smith:
Especially since an associative array should have a .keys property that
returns a set.
I don't agree. I think associative arrays should have .keys/.values/.items that return a
lazy view that acts like a .set/.list/.list of pairs. Such lazy views don't
Daniel Keep wrote:
Actually, I've been thinking and I realised that in 95% of cases, you
can assume a range is resumable if it has no references.
Well I'm not so sure. How about a range around an integral file handle
or socket?
If it has no
references, the only way the range can be
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Actually, I've been thinking and I realised that in 95% of cases, you
can assume a range is resumable if it has no references.
Well I'm not so sure. How about a range around an integral file handle
or socket?
If ranges can advertise their
yidabu schrieb:
Exception with test case:
3249 Fatal dwt - java\util\HashSet.d 31: implementation missing in file
java\util\HashSet.d line 31
3255 Fatal dwt - java\util\HashSet.d 31: Please create a bug report at
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt
3261 Fatal dwt - java\util\HashSet.d
Thanks.It works now.
Doctor J wrote:
Answered my own question:
static if (is(typeof(func0) == function))
writefln(func0 is a function.);
is() really wants a type, not an expression.
You say you want to test whether a struct/class member is a field or a
property. Pointers to class and struct methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833
--- Comment #5 from webmas...@aj-productions.de 2009-04-13 03:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(WTF it's completely unnecessary to put
all these corporate trademark tags in a bug report ;)
I was just giving the full CPU name string
17 matches
Mail list logo
