Thanks for the reply, Russel!
Ok, I'll add unit tests and some example.
As for support for other databases, it's complex enough task to design good
common database layer, while I currently need only SQLite. Apart from
that, there are
very few types in SQLite, and these tipes map into D's intenal
From user side it's not hard to make it simple. Differences could be minimized,
plugins added etc. I'll try to add MySQL, and if it's possible to implement
common interface, I'll do it. But I'm not sure that it will be easy.
2010/11/16 Diego Cano Lagneaux d.cano.lagne...@gmail.com:
[ ... ]
In
bearophile Wrote:
He also gives a quite useful unittest that the student implementation must
pass, this is a good usage of unittests. The unit test ends like this:
...
writeln(unit test passed);
}
Indeed, a person needs feedback that the unittests have run (and have
succeed), I
On 2010-11-16 01:10, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I think allowing the second expression in the ternary operator to be omitted
would be a better fit for D, and provide the same function.
ie.
auto x = a ? a : b;
auto x = a ? : b;
Personally I had '|||' in mind, but I'm OK with '?:'. I think it should
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
Why don't you contribute? It's a lot of work.
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:32:07 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 11:44:11 spir wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:45:26 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:00:33 Manfred_Nowak wrote:
Jonathan M Davis
Am 16.11.2010 03:33, schrieb DOLIVE:
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
please, please - learn a little bit more english
all your posts are just sounding like commands
spir:
(and bug-prone, because sometimes the absence of a fields seems not caught,
for any reason), so I add fields to the top type.
What do you mean? Do you have an example?
(Adding fields to the top type doesn't look like a good idea, generally).
Bye,
bearophile
== Quote from dennis luehring (dl.so...@gmx.net)'s article
Am 16.11.2010 03:33, schrieb DOLIVE:
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
please, please - learn a little bit more english
pour qui?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:44:06 +0100
Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote:
On 2010-11-16 01:10, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I think allowing the second expression in the ternary operator to be omitted
would be a better fit for D, and provide the same function.
ie.
auto x = a ? a : b;
auto x =
dennis luehring дµ½:
Am 16.11.2010 03:33, schrieb DOLIVE:
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
please, please - learn a little bit more english
all your posts are just sounding like commands
haha... : )
dennis luehring дµ½:
Am 16.11.2010 03:33, schrieb DOLIVE:
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
please, please - learn a little bit more english
all your posts are just sounding like commands
haha... sory ! : )
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:37:52 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
(and bug-prone, because sometimes the absence of a fields seems not caught,
for any reason), so I add fields to the top type.
What do you mean? Do you have an example?
(Adding fields to the top type
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:37:52 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
(and bug-prone, because sometimes the absence of a fields seems not caught,
for any reason), so I add fields to the top type.
What do you mean? Do you have an example?
(Adding fields to the top type
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:02:27 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
To have the language continually working against that goal is going to
great for inexperienced programmers but hell for people trying to
squeeze performance out of it.
The experienced
On 16.11.2010 14:40, spir wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:37:52 -0500
bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
(and bug-prone, because sometimes the absence of a fields seems not caught, for
any reason), so I add fields to the top type.
What do you mean? Do you have an example?
Daniel Murphy, el 16 de noviembre a las 10:10 me escribiste:
Per �ngstr�m d-n...@autark.se wrote in message
news:ibr8bs$22m...@digitalmars.com...
return s || default;
I think allowing the second expression in the ternary operator to be omitted
would be a better fit for D, and provide
Graham Fawcett Wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:15:15 -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
To be honest, I haven't spent much time with Go because my cursory
exposure to the language hasn't shown it to solve the problems I
care about better than the languages I currently use. I think Go is
in the
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
Sean Kelly Wrote:
shared uint cnt;
void atomicInc ( ) { uint o; while ( !cas( cnt, o, o + 1 ) ) o =
cnt; }
is compiled with dmd -O to something like:
shared uint cnt;
void atomicInc ( ) { while ( !cas( cnt, cnt, cnt + 1 ) ) { } }
What a mess. DMD
I'm trying to use remove() from std.algorithm to remove item from an
array and when I tried to use SwapStrategy.unstable (as I don't need
to maintain order of items in array and I want to optimize where ever
I can) I came to surprising results. In the example below one would
expect that item at
Script mode (actually - simple wrapper) would be better:
It could do simple parsing of script, bringing all import clauses to
the beginning and add some default imports (like std.stdio). It seems
that all code below imports can be wrapped into main declaration. So
for
writeln(hello, world!);
we
Hi,
I've noticed that the modulus operator acts differently when the divisor is
the length of an array and the dividend is negative.
For instance, this code:
import std.stdio;
const int x = 4;
void main(){
int[x] arr = [0, 1, 2, 3];
writeln(Using arr.length);
for(int i = -3; i = 0;
Hi,
assert(false) should generate the hlt instruction in release mode.
I.e.
assert.d:
void hlt() {
assert(false);
}
$ dmd -release -c assert.d
$ obj2asm assert.o | grep -w hlt
works. But
$ dmd -unittest -release -c assert.d
$ obj2asm assert.o | grep -w hlt
fails.
Can't one have hlt
Script mode (actually - simple wrapper) would be better:
It could do simple parsing of script, bringing all import
clauses to the beginning and add some default imports
(like std.stdio). It seems that all code below imports can be
wrapped into main declaration.
My rund.d program does this.
DMD currently follows a fairly standard compiler methodology:
- Compile a bunch of source files into binary objects (to generate .o).
- Act as a front end to an archiver (to generate .a).
- Act as a front end to a linker (to generate final binary).
This makes integration with most build systems
== Quote from Jens Mueller (jens.k.muel...@gmx.de)'s article
Hi,
assert(false) should generate the hlt instruction in release mode.
I.e.
assert.d:
void hlt() {
assert(false);
}
$ dmd -release -c assert.d
$ obj2asm assert.o | grep -w hlt
works. But
$ dmd -unittest -release -c
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jens Mueller (jens.k.muel...@gmx.de)'s article
Hi,
assert(false) should generate the hlt instruction in release mode.
I.e.
assert.d:
void hlt() {
assert(false);
}
$ dmd -release -c assert.d
$ obj2asm assert.o | grep -w hlt
works. But
$ dmd
Hi,
I've noticed that the modulus operator acts differently when the divisor is
the length of an array and the dividend is negative.
For instance, this code:
import std.stdio;
const int x = 4;
void main(){
int[x] arr = [0, 1, 2, 3];
writeln(Using arr.length);
for(int i =
Steven Schveighoffer:
The experienced programmers may write scope int[] a..., and have no
heap allocations.
This is a good idea. This isn't what I thought spir was saying, I thought
he wanted the function to always allocate.
I have also suggested that when scope is not present, DMD
On 11/16/10 4:40 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:02:27 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
I have even suggested a transitive @noheap annotation, similar to
@nothrow, that makes sure a function contains no heap allocations and
doesn't call other things that
On 11/16/10 4:24 AM, Aleksandar Ružičić wrote:
I'm trying to use remove() from std.algorithm to remove item from an
array and when I tried to use SwapStrategy.unstable (as I don't need
to maintain order of items in array and I want to optimize where ever
I can) I came to surprising results. In
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I am sorry for the inadvertent change, it wasn't meant to change
semantics of existing code. I'm not sure whether one of my unrelated
64-bit changes messed things up. You may want to file a bug report.
There are a number of good reasons for which I was
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:55:24 -0500, David Osborne krendilbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that the modulus operator acts differently when the divisor
is
the length of an array and the dividend is negative.
For instance, this code:
import std.stdio;
const int x = 4;
void main(){
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need another branch in the hierarchy, like ranges... Then
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:04:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 4:40 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:02:27 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
I have even suggested a transitive @noheap annotation, similar to
Users who consider using these two modules in conjunction should beware of
clashes.
I used std.socketstream in a micro-server context to read the individual lines
of an http request.
After that I reverted to socket level to keep the connection open for some time
so that the client could
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need another branch
On 11/16/2010 01:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became
more generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need
Am 16.11.2010 18:38, schrieb Travis:
The one thing I have been wondering however is why doesn't DMD have a flag for
easy project building which compiles dependencies in a single command.
[...]
Thanks,
tbone
Have you tried 'rdmd' ?
I have moaned several times about the fact that this module does not have a
method for creating a date from the system clock.
It provides a parse method to convert a string in a limited number of formats.
In the course of doing that, it calls the OS primitive to get the time zone
offset.
So
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:46:48 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became
more
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:31:43 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:04:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 4:40 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:02:27 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com
On 11/16/10 10:16 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I am sorry for the inadvertent change, it wasn't meant to change
semantics of existing code. I'm not sure whether one of my unrelated
64-bit changes messed things up. You may want to file a bug report.
There are a number of
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:11:05 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
I have moaned several times about the fact that this module does not
have a method for creating a date from the system clock.
It provides a parse method to convert a string in a limited number of
formats.
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
I'm guessing you are referring to php's pcre vs posix regex? I think
posix is marked as deprecated...
Steve,
No. I just meant that the library that comes with PHP seems happy to provide
different ways of doing the same thing, as in for example, CURL,
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:30:03 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The standard library should not have something to please everyone. If
there is 5 different styles to do the same thing, it will be a failure.
Agreed. Ideally, the standard library would be very uniform in approach. That
makes
On 11/16/10 10:46 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
No problem, just to isolate the code and to confirm it's not something
to other parts of my code (but I'm pretty sure it's not).
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 4:24 AM, Aleksandar Ružičić wrote:
I'm trying to use remove()
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:11:05 Steve Teale wrote:
I have moaned several times about the fact that this module does not have a
method for creating a date from the system clock.
It provides a parse method to convert a string in a limited number of
formats. In the course of doing that,
filed as Issue #5224 - http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5224
regards,
Aleksandar
2010/11/16 Aleksandar Ružičić ruzicic.aleksan...@gmail.com:
No problem, just to isolate the code and to confirm it's not something
to other parts of my code (but I'm pretty sure it's not).
On Tue,
On 11/13/2010 11:43 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 08:18 +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[ . . . ]
import std.typecons; ?
Hummm... I thought I had put that in but clearly I had not :-(( OK so
that explains the bulk of the problems on this code, I knew it was
something stupid on my
Jonathan M Davis:
Pure is hard enough to deal with (especially since it we probably have made
it
the default, but it's too late for that now).
Weakly pure on default isn't good for a language that is supposed to b e
somewhat compatible with C syntax, I think it breaks too many C functions.
I'm trying to use BinaryHeap in a multithreaded programming using
std.parallelism/parallelfuture. I kept getting ridiculous segfaults and
stuff, and when I looked into it in a debugger, I realized the crashes had to
do with reference counting, probably caused by this line in BinaryHeap:
Steve Teale Wrote:
It also strikes me as odd that it does not include a table of leap seconds.
As it stands, some of its methods could return values that were out by a year
for up to four or five seconds on January 1 2011. I'm no expert on UTC,
Gregorian Calendar and such, so I could well
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 12:37:10 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Pure is hard enough to deal with (especially since it we probably have
made it the default, but it's too late for that now).
Weakly pure on default isn't good for a language that is supposed to b e
somewhat
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:24:02 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:30:03 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The standard library should not have something to please everyone. If
there is 5 different styles to do the same thing, it will be a failure.
dsimcha:
I think this is correct. The -unittest switch implicitly turns on asserts,
and as
far as I can tell makes the -release switch ignored. This means that
assert(false) is no longer special and works just like a regular assert as
per TDPL.
Is this a problem in practice? If so,
Steve Teale:
The current system, where modules of the library can get arbitrarily
deprecated and at some point removed because they are unfashionable, is very
unfriendly.
We are in the initial phase of Phobos develpment, so frequent large changes are
expected. Surely one year from now
David Osborne wrote:
Using arr.length
-3 mod 3 = 1 -- this should be 0
-2 mod 3 = 2 -- this should be 1
-1 mod 3 = 0 -- this should be 2
0 mod 3 = 0
Like others have said, this is due to the fact that when one
operand is unsigned (here the length), then all operands get casted
to
On 11/16/10 12:47 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I'm trying to use BinaryHeap in a multithreaded programming using
std.parallelism/parallelfuture. I kept getting ridiculous segfaults and
stuff, and when I looked into it in a debugger, I realized the crashes had to
do with reference counting, probably
Jérôme M. Berger Wrote:
-3 mod 3 = 0
-2 mod 3 = -2
-1 mod 3 = -1
0 mod 3 = 0
Note that from a strictly mathematical point of view, this result
is valid: for all x and all n, x-(x%n) is a multiple of n.
It's rather (x/n)+(x%n)==x
I really think that it would be good to ship something like this with
dmd and promote it default D script handler.
May be, parsing must be more complicated (I'm not sure that all
features will work inside main()), but as D is easy for
parsing I see no big problems.Of cource, we can add more
Kagamin wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger Wrote:
-3 mod 3 = 0
-2 mod 3 = -2
-1 mod 3 = -1
0 mod 3 = 0
Note that from a strictly mathematical point of view, this result
is valid: for all x and all n, x-(x%n) is a multiple of n.
It's rather (x/n)+(x%n)==x
That is (part of) the
Am 16.11.2010 18:09, schrieb Sean Kelly:
cas() contains an asm block. Though I guess in this case the compiler
isn't actually optimizing across it. Does atomic!+=(cnt, 1) work
correctly? I know the issue with shared would still have to be fixed,
but that code uses asm for the load as well, so
J. M. Berger:
(bearophile probably has a bug report for it ;) )
Yup, bug 3843.
Bye,
bearophile
On 2010-11-16 15:47:07 -0500, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com said:
I'm trying to use BinaryHeap in a multithreaded programming using
std.parallelism/parallelfuture. I kept getting ridiculous segfaults and
stuff, and when I looked into it in a debugger, I realized the crashes had to
do with
Thanks for the info, everyone. I guess I'll just have to be more careful
what I use modulus with :)
~Dave
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 03:40:24 spir wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:37:52 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
(and bug-prone, because sometimes the absence of a fields seems not
caught, for any reason), so I add fields to the top type.
What do you mean? Do
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 13:00:17 Kagamin wrote:
Steve Teale Wrote:
It also strikes me as odd that it does not include a table of leap
seconds. As it stands, some of its methods could return values that were
out by a year for up to four or five seconds on January 1 2011. I'm no
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:04:18 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 12:37:10 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Pure is hard enough to deal with (especially since it we probably have
made it the default, but it's too late for that now).
Weakly pure
stephan Wrote:
Am 16.11.2010 18:09, schrieb Sean Kelly:
cas() contains an asm block. Though I guess in this case the compiler
isn't actually optimizing across it. Does atomic!+=(cnt, 1) work
correctly? I know the issue with shared would still have to be fixed,
but that code uses asm for
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:24:32 -0500, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
I'm guessing you are referring to php's pcre vs posix regex? I think
posix is marked as deprecated...
Steve,
No. I just meant that the library that comes with PHP seems
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:17:53 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
(DST is one of the stupidest ideas even IMHO; I don't even
want to _think_ about how many bugs it's created)
No, the stupidest idea was to *change* DST a few years ago. That had
absolutely no purpose, I can't
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
Andrei
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:47:07 -0500, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm trying to use BinaryHeap in a multithreaded programming using
std.parallelism/parallelfuture. I kept getting ridiculous segfaults and
stuff, and when I looked into it in a debugger, I realized the crashes
had to
do
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
Andrei
I like go because every single feature go has is the best ever!
yawn...
-Steve
On 11/16/10 9:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
Andrei
I like go because every single feature go has is the best ever!
yawn...
-Steve
I'm curious
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:24:50 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 9:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
Andrei
I
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 21:08:48 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:17:53 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
(DST is one of the stupidest ideas even IMHO; I don't even
want to _think_ about how many bugs it's created)
No, the stupidest idea was to
On 11/16/10 9:58 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:24:50 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 9:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/2010 22:24, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm curious what the response to my example will be. So far I got one
that doesn't even address it.
I really don't see the problem with requiring that '{' goes on the same
line as 'if'. It's something you learn once and never forget because it
is
On 11/16/2010 21:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It makes me think that this is going to be extremely confusing for a
while, because people are so used to pure being equated with a
functional language, so when they see a function is pure but takes
mutable data, they will be scratching their
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 20:53:04 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:04:18 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 12:37:10 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Pure is hard enough to deal with (especially since it we probably
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 23:03:05 Rainer Deyke wrote:
On 11/16/2010 21:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It makes me think that this is going to be extremely confusing for a
while, because people are so used to pure being equated with a
functional language, so when they see a function is
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 22:55:42 Rainer Deyke wrote:
On 11/16/2010 22:24, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm curious what the response to my example will be. So far I got one
that doesn't even address it.
I really don't see the problem with requiring that '{' goes on the same
line as
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
Honestly, leap seconds are complete stupidity with regards to computers. They
just complicate things.
I think, it's ok, computers work with nominal time and synchronize with world
as needed. Hardly you can catch a bug with leap seconds.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:58:28 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:24:50 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 11/16/10 9:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:35:19 +0100
Simen kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:34:46 +0300, Ellery Newcomer
ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu wrote:
My gut feeling is that the if statement's behavior is wrong and the
while statement's is correct, but it could go either way.
I agree, I think case with 'when' works as specs say.
No need for a rationale
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2954
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4414
Per �ngstr�m d-bugzi...@autark.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d-bugzi...@autark.se
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2828
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5221
Summary: entity.c: Merge Walter's list with Thomas'
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5221
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-11-16 05:45:59 PST ---
Random examples of tests that fail on DMD:
static assert('\check;'==10003);
static assert('\lsim;'==8818);
static assert('\numero;'==8470);
static
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5221
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-11-16 06:07:53 PST ---
(From update of attachment 815)
diff -ur src.orig/entity.c src/entity.c
--- src.orig/entity.c2010-03-31 01:26:18.0 +0100
+++ src/entity.c2010-11-16
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5222
Summary: label prepending block in 'ThenStatement' breaks
creating new scope
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
Summary: [qtd] Cannot use default value with function parameter
of struct type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5223
--- Comment #1 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-11-16 09:48:10
PST ---
Even simpler test-case:
struct S
{
this(int x)
{
}
void foo(S s = S(42))
{
}
}
void main()
{
S s;
s.foo(); // error
}
Error:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5224
Summary: std.algorithm.remove!(SwapStrategy.unstable) doesn't
work
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity:
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
