Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void methodA(long x){...}
}
void
On 2011-05-27 08:34, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void
Hi,
From what I can see,...
The documentation seems to be making something simple harder to
understand with lots of noises added. It is scattered all over the
places. Many information Seem like a lot of dark/unwritten known by only
a few persons.
1) There is No clear organizations.
On 5/27/2011 2:54 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Hi Jacob,
See some of the source code shown here. I did not code them, but can
sense the pattern is not too productive brain cycle invested.
Cycle= trying to locate up the tree of inherited object.
BTW, default D documentation is Not too friendly
On Fri, 27 May 2011 02:34:34 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental
The docs show the syntax and code fragments, not entire compilable
examples. Although if you provide a main() and copy the code, with
some slight adjustments it should work. In cases where it's obvious
that a code sample would not compile due to some typo or mistake, you
can file a bug report.
If
On 2011-05-27 09:35, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi,
From what I can see,...
The documentation seems to be making something simple harder to
understand with lots of noises added. It is scattered all over the
places. Many information Seem like a lot of dark/unwritten known by only
a few persons.
1)
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 02:34:34 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has
On 5/27/2011 7:13 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
If there's missing documentation, file a bug report.
Will do that soon.
Otherwise the docs are not a tutorial for the language. If there ever
will be a tutorial that's hosted on the D website it will probably be
in a section of its own.
Foo/Bar
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:42:17 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will work that well. Consider how function hijacking
happens. For instance, the parent class author may not even know his
code is being overridden, and he
On 5/27/2011 7:27 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 09:35, Matthew Ong wrote:
The documentation on the DigitalMars site is more of a language
reference than a tutorial. It's probably not the best place to start but
when you know the language is good to be able to look some odd syntax
you
I'm not sure how Vehicles or Bank Account is going to help describe
access modifiers. There's no connection, and will end up confusing the
reader. Foo and Bar are used when the focus is not on the semantics
but on the syntax of the language.
On the other hand, if you're going to explain
On 5/27/2011 8:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sorry, I used the wrong term, I meant derived or extended.
Explain please. You lost me. If I am not wrong, final is used to prevent
overriding. Is that what you are talking about?
Yes, but you marked the child as inheritall, doesn't this
On 5/27/2011 8:13 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
that just show the syntax of the language, I think foobar is ok.
I totally agree, I wrote that I think. However, the problem are clearly
seen here at least:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html # people done
C++ can understand
Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:iro4gg$1763$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/27/2011 7:27 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 09:35, Matthew Ong wrote:
The documentation on the DigitalMars site is more of a language
reference than a tutorial. It's probably not the best place
Am 27.05.2011 14:08, schrieb Matthew Ong:
On 5/27/2011 7:27 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 09:35, Matthew Ong wrote:
The documentation on the DigitalMars site is more of a language
reference than a tutorial. It's probably not the best place to start but
when you know the language
On 5/27/11, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html # people done
C++ can understand others may not.
Well, explaining the concept of operator overloading should be a
separate topic. People who know what operator overloading is will look
in
On Fri, 27 May 2011 08:36:08 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/27/2011 8:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sorry, I used the wrong term, I meant derived or extended.
Explain please. You lost me. If I am not wrong, final is used to prevent
overriding. Is that what you are
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:22:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/27/11, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html # people done
C++ can understand others may not.
Well, explaining the concept of operator
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Do you have cases where you have to alias all over the place?
news://news.digitalmars.com:119/iri4am$2dl3$1...@digitalmars.com
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:42:17 -0400, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will work that well. Consider how function hijacking
happens. For instance, the parent class author may
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:43:39 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I may see why you see so many cases -- dwt was likely ran through a java
to d converter, and such converters often add unnecessary lines, because
it is easier to do that
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void
On 5/27/2011 9:16 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
better and better -- YES - your talking mostly to sparetime developers
here
I have some sense that is the case here because of different email
domain from so many different coder. No wonder there does not seem to be
properly organized. There is
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:10:25 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I
On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Maybe you are not doing something correctly, you shouldn't need this
feature all the time.
Not me, others that has coded the dwt and I suspect other code in
On 5/27/11 9:26 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:10:25 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:54:14 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It is completely against the spirit of the language to decide that a
call is resolved to an invalid method during runtime. There is no other
feature remotely related to hiddenfunc.
A couple of
Just starting myself with D, I can second that. This (
http://warpspire.com/talks/documentation/ ) explains much better than
I could, how important documentation is.
The best type of tutorial and documentation format I have seen so far
and yet simple to understand are shown here.
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
Besides, we already have ddoc for generating documentation. And that
really only applies to Phobos, not the language docs.
On 5/27/11 11:35 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
I got curious and clicked on a few referred links - which one are you
referring to?
Andrei
On 5/27/11 10:04 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:54:14 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It is completely against the spirit of the language to decide that a
call is resolved to an invalid method during runtime. There is no
other feature
On 5/28/2011 12:35 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
Besides, we already have ddoc for generating documentation. And that
really only applies to Phobos, not the language docs.
Alexander,
You sounded like a young
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by throwing an exception was hotly debated. Several people
suggested alternative, of whom one proposed (4) above. Everybody agreed
it's a good
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
Then it obviously must have no value at all :)
Besides, we already have ddoc for generating documentation.
I was not implying that D was lacking tools. I meant to say, that
documentation is - apart from
You sounded like a young chap, when was your first programming language,
what year?
Basic and Logo on my Amstrad CPC 64 (around 1996?) ... so I am not
sooo young anymore, but thanks nonetheless :)
On 5/27/11, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/27/11 11:35 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
I got curious and clicked on a few referred links - which one are you
referring to?
If D is able to come up with some form of sandbox tutorial
environment http://golang.org/doc/playground.html
It's already been done, just with a few bugs. It runs real D
on code examples.
It will hopefully be merged with the next release.
On 5/27/2011 10:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
At least not using foo and bar, I am able to understand some of that is
being discussed here. Thank you all.
2 is just annoying.
For the sake of backward compatibility, keep that machination.
On 5/28/2011 1:01 AM, Alexander Battisti wrote:
Every other word in that presentation is Awesome. It looks like an
Apple advertisement.
Then it obviously must have no value at all :)
Besides, we already have ddoc for generating documentation.
I was not implying that D was lacking tools. I
On 5/28/2011 1:17 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
If D is able to come up with some form of sandbox tutorial
environment http://golang.org/doc/playground.html
It's already been done, just with a few bugs. It runs real D
on code examples.
It will hopefully be merged with the next release.
Wonderful,
On 2011-05-27 06:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:22:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/27/11, Matthew Ong on...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html # people done
C++ can understand others may not.
On 5/28/2011 1:09 AM, Alexander Battisti wrote:
Basic and Logo on my Amstrad CPC 64 (around 1996?) ... so I am not
sooo young anymore, but thanks nonetheless :)
My was turbo C++ on MS DOS 6.22 around 1995.
I think we might be in the same age range.
--
Matthew Ong
email: on...@yahoo.com
On 5/27/11 1:06 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by throwing an exception was hotly debated. Several people
suggested alternative, of whom one proposed
On May 28, 11 01:19, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/28/2011 1:17 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
If D is able to come up with some form of sandbox tutorial
environment http://golang.org/doc/playground.html
It's already been done, just with a few bugs. It runs real D
on code examples.
It will hopefully be
On 5/28/2011 1:24 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-27 06:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
LOL. Yeah. Java will never have operator overloading. That would be on the
list of features that were considered unsafe. And I know plenty of folks who
are against operator overloading for similar
D has lambdas and closures and plenty of other things.
It doesn't have a lot of runtime-introspection though, it doesn't run
on a VM I'm affraid. :)
On 5/28/2011 1:31 AM, KennyTM~ wrote:
On May 28, 11 01:19, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/28/2011 1:17 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
You can check a sample in
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_algorithm2.html.
Ah... good idea. Very close to that.
Perhaps format like coffee using more interesting side
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/std/range.d#L767
Would it make sense to introduce a hasOpaqueLength oslt. to fix this?
--
Best regards,
Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
On 2011-05-27 11:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/
std/range.d#L767
Would it make sense to introduce a hasOpaqueLength oslt. to fix this?
Um. Why? What would it give you? hasLength is
On May 28, 11 02:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/std/range.d#L767
Would it make sense to introduce a hasOpaqueLength oslt. to fix this?
You mean std.array.join? The 2-argument overload
On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:18:40 +0300, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On 2011-05-27 11:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/
std/range.d#L767
Would it make sense to introduce a
On Fri, 27 May 2011 13:25:51 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:06 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by
On 2011-05-27 11:25, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:18:40 +0300, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On 2011-05-27 11:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302
df/
On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:29:10 +0300, KennyTM~ kenn...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 28, 11 02:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/std/range.d#L767
Would it make sense to introduce a hasOpaqueLength
On May 28, 11 02:51, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:29:10 +0300, KennyTM~ kenn...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 28, 11 02:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302df/std/range.d#L767
Matthew Ong Wrote:
Perhaps format like coffee using more interesting side by side
comparison and with more writefln/writeln rather than assert.
Assert does not show anything visually.
I understand this position and that new programers of D find it odd that
examples don't have any output.
On 2011-05-27 11:51, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:29:10 +0300, KennyTM~ kenn...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 28, 11 02:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Why hasLength!string is false:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/96941d5384a5fee302
df/std/range.d#L767
On 2011-05-27 16:09, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:43:39 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I may see why you see so many cases -- dwt was likely ran through a java
to d converter, and such converters often add
On 2011-05-27 16:18, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 9:16 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
better and better -- YES - your talking mostly to sparetime developers
here
I have some sense that is the case here because of different email
domain from so many different coder. No wonder there does not
On 5/27/2011 12:02 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Matthew Ong Wrote:
Perhaps format like coffee using more interesting side by side comparison
and with more writefln/writeln rather than assert. Assert does not show
anything visually.
I understand this position and that new programers of D find it
On 2011-05-27 16:38, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Maybe you are not doing something correctly, you shouldn't need this
feature all the time.
Not me, others that has
On 5/27/11 2:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-27 11:51, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[snip]
Create a bug report and I'll look into it.
- Jonathan M Davis
Thank you, Vladimir and even more so Jonathan!
Andrei
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:01:00 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What's the state of your update to std.path? Have you had time to get
back to it yet?
Actually, I'd say it's ready. I'll integrate it with the rest of Phobos
and put it up for review as soon as the TempAlloc review is done.
-Lars
On 2011-05-27 19:24, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-27 06:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:22:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/27/11, Matthew Ongon...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html #
On 2011-05-27 12:33, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/27/11 2:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-27 11:51, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[snip]
Create a bug report and I'll look into it.
- Jonathan M Davis
Thank you, Vladimir and even more so Jonathan!
Well, I'm in the midst of
On 2011-05-27 12:27, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 16:38, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
When coding my own projects (projects I've written from scratch and not
ported from other languages) it's a feature I rarely use, don't know if
I ever have used
On 2011-05-27 12:40, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:01:00 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What's the state of your update to std.path? Have you had time to get
back to it yet?
Actually, I'd say it's ready. I'll integrate it with the rest of Phobos
and put it up for
On Fri, 27 May 2011 22:00:35 +0300, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
Create a bug report and I'll look into it.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6064 . Thanks!
I had a look into fixing it myself, but the changes required are not
trivial - joiner always returns a
On 5/27/11 9:09 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 16:18, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 9:16 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
[…]
that YOU can start imeditately by bringing in new/changed content -
would be great
It is too early for me to do that as I am just 3 week in D.
Maybe that's
I've seen this with some examples of handy API for HTTP requests, useful for
the Phobos devs that want to add a Phobos module to perform such things:
http://pydanny.blogspot.com/2011/05/python-http-requests-for-humans.html
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/requests
Bye,
bearophile
My D curl wrapper (hopefully soon to be obsolete by a std.curl thing)
does it this way:
string response = curl(url); // does a GET on the url
string response = curl(url, some_post_data); // does a POST
string response = curl(url, some_post_data, post_content_type); // POST with a
special
On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:58:33 +0300, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
This is fantastic for ICE bugs. But it doesn't work well for certain
types of bugs, such as the one I tracked down recently, which are of
the form:
I've improved DustMite with your suggestions, and added the
Hi All,
The main aim here is to find out how to model similar syntax within D.
Due to the nature of the architecture of the library that I have
designed in Java and heavily leans towards interface generics.
It works well with java.
Yes. I am aware about Tuple to allow me to do multiple value
On 5/25/2011 5:43 PM, bearophile wrote:
alias A.foo foo; // ### Why the extra steps is needed for the compiler
to 'know' overloaded functions from base classes?
Others have already answered. I also suggest you to compile your code using the
-w switch when possible.
Bye,
bearophile
That is
On 2011-05-27 07:55, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
The main aim here is to find out how to model similar syntax within D.
Due to the nature of the architecture of the library that I have
designed in Java and heavily leans towards interface generics.
It works well with java.
Yes. I am aware about
On 5/27/2011 2:03 PM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Would not it be a better keyword such as:
class A{
// assuming there is a new keyword of noinherit
noinherit void foo(int x){} // all other method can be inherited in A
except for this class
}
Ignore the last message on new noinherit, just remember we
On 5/27/2011 2:32 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 07:55, Matthew Ong wrote:
In D the syntax for declaring a template and instantiate a template is
not the same. Have a look at the first example of
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/template.htm
If don't understand after reading that
On 2011-05-26 23:48, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 2:32 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 07:55, Matthew Ong wrote:
In D the syntax for declaring a template and instantiate a template is
not the same. Have a look at the first example of
On 5/27/2011 2:48 PM, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 2:32 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 07:55, Matthew Ong wrote:
Never mind, I found it.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tutorials/wiki/InterfaceTemplateExample
--
Matthew Ong
email: on...@yahoo.com
On 5/27/2011 2:48 PM, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 2:32 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Thanks very much.
--
Matthew Ong
email: on...@yahoo.com
Guys, where did you get the unix cp port from? I don't have it installed, so I
can't use make install -fwin32.mak. I've also tried using the one that comes
with UnxTools from http://sourceforge.net/projects/unxutils/ , but that one
fails with:
cp.exe: cannot create regular file
On 27.05.2011 16:06, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Guys, where did you get the unix cp port from? I don't have it installed, so I can't use
make install -fwin32.mak. I've also tried using the one that comes with
UnxTools from http://sourceforge.net/projects/unxutils/ , but that one fails with:
You know it'd be great if I could synchronize git with a build system.
I mean if I'm switching between branches I'd like to automatically
switch to a pre-compiled .lib file so I don't waste time recompiling a
branch which was already compiled.
On 27/05/2011 13:06, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Guys, where did you get the unix cp port from? I don't have it
installed, so I can't use make install -fwin32.mak. I've also tried
using the one that comes with UnxTools from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/unxutils/ , but that one fails with:
I am attempting to compile a simple d source file using the
http://learn-programming.za.net/learn_d_programming.html site as a guide to
learning D programming.
dmd2 is installed in D:\D\dmd. When I attempt to compile I get the following
error:
D:\D\programsdmd first.d
object.d: Error: module
Robert Smith:
I am attempting to compile a simple d source file using the
http://learn-programming.za.net/learn_d_programming.html site as a guide to
learning D programming.
dmd2 is installed in D:\D\dmd.
Installing DMD on Windows is very easy:
1) Download the latest compiler, like dmd
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I have the path set with a batch file that opens a command window. A
dmd command in this window displays the dmd usage help: DMD32 D Compiler
v2.053...
and a link command displays: OPTLINK (R) for Win32...
What kind of build helper is available for Win32?
Robert Smith
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4312
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014
--- Comment #3 from changlon chang...@gmail.com 2011-05-27 03:13:15 PDT ---
I have no idea how to reduce this test case or how to trace the bug.
I build the project with -g -debug, then run gdb . But the error is not in the
project code . it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4312
--- Comment #5 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2011-05-27 06:46:29 PDT ---
I'm not defining a closure. I'm defining a nested function literal. And given
that the following compiles:
void main()
{
int b;
int funcliteral(int a){return
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4312
--- Comment #6 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-27 07:16:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I'm not defining a closure. I'm defining a nested function literal. And given
that the following compiles:
void main()
{
int b;
int
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4312
Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6063
Summary: Make cases where hiddenfuncerror would be thrown an
error without -w
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6049
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6064
Summary: std.array.join is unnecessarily slow for strings
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: performance
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5511
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5805
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6065
Summary: [toir.c] Problem caused by std.functional.not
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity:
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
