Re: Invariant and pre/post-conditions order

Walter Bright wrote: > I'm not going to swap them without a compelling demonstration of > its advantages. If there are advantages, then the specs are wrong, because they do not define the sequence of execution and an optimizing compiler might put the calls to s and `invariant' into different t

Re: Invariant and pre/post-conditions order

On 1/20/2012 12:23 AM, Manfred Nowak wrote: If there are advantages, then the specs are wrong, I recently fixed the specs to define the sequence.

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

Am 19.01.2012, 21:53 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan M Davis : On Thursday, January 19, 2012 20:56:39 Marco Leise wrote: I just came across some C++ code and came to the conclusion, that properties and indexed access should not modify the structure. In other words all my @property and opIndex will probab

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Friday, January 20, 2012 09:58:42 Marco Leise wrote: > Ah, I meant to say that getters should not modify their object. When I see > "a = abc.x[i]" I would be a little surprised to find that it changes the > observable state of abc. The same goes for "a = b.length()". Now it is > clearer, isn't i

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 20/01/12 12:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:41:44 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/19/12 4:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:06:00 -0500, torhu wrote: If the type of byKeys is Range, I would expect to be able to treat it like one. N

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Friday, January 20, 2012 09:29:12 Peter Alexander wrote: > Can you define what "is logically a property means"? (I assume you meant > "field" there) > > That means different things to different people. For example, in my > mind, something that is logically a field would have an address. From >

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

Jose Armando Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu > wrote: >> On 1/19/12 4:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:06:00 -0500, torhu wrote: If the type of byKeys is Range, I would expect to be able to treat it like one. No

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 22:30:46 Jose Armando Garcia wrote: > > I think MSDN has some decent advice on when to use properties vs > > methods: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bzwdh01d(v=vs.71).aspx#cpconpropert > > yusageguidelinesanchor1 > > Those do see

Re: C++ pimpl

First of all thanks for this fast answer! > On 1/19/2012 12:48 PM, Roberto Caravani wrote: > > I think this would be a real neat and very important feature, when it > > comes to shared libraries. Is there any plan to implement something > > like that in the future? Do I miss something? > > The pi

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Friday, January 20, 2012 11:01:10 Jens Mueller wrote: > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 22:30:46 Jose Armando Garcia wrote: > > > I think MSDN has some decent advice on when to use properties vs > > > methods: > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bzwdh01d(v=vs.

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Friday, January 20, 2012 11:01:10 Jens Mueller wrote: > > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2012 22:30:46 Jose Armando Garcia wrote: > > > > I think MSDN has some decent advice on when to use properties vs > > > > methods: > > > > http://msdn.micros

wxWidgets good news

Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/master/docs/doxygen/scripts/make_bindings.py Generating C functional wrappers is alr

Re: wxWidgets good news

!!! Il giorno ven, 20/01/2012 alle 03.24 -0800, bls ha scritto: > Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D > bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this > happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, > https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/master/docs/

Re: Biggest Issue with D - Definition and Versioning

On 19 January 2012 22:52, deadalnix wrote: > You write some code and they face an error. As you are new to the > language, unless you are crazy, you'll asume that the mistake comes from > you and not from the compiler (this is an usual experience in other > languages : I almost never encounter co

Re: Biggest Issue with D - Definition and Versioning

Manu: > I am quite sad that a lot of the > broken things in there now are un-fixable. If you want to write a short list of such broken things... :-) Bye, bearophile

Re: wxWidgets good news

Generating C functional wrappers is already pretty cool, but the fantastic news is SWIG output! As you may have noticed, SWIG has D support. Means : No need to manually re-create C++ classes in D. Does SWIG D support static linking by now?

Re: Message-Passing

On 20 January 2012 00:36, Sean Kelly wrote: > Thanks :-) If you have ideas on how it could be improved, please let me > know. > > On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Nathan M. Swan wrote: > > > I want to applaud Sean Kelly and everyone who worked on std.concurrency > for a great API, and wish that I c

Re: wxWidgets good news

I don't think so. I use swig for d, c#, php, python but it always build shared libraries. Il giorno ven, 20/01/2012 alle 13.51 +0100, Trass3r ha scritto: > > Generating C functional wrappers is already pretty cool, but the > > fantastic news is SWIG output! As you may have noticed, SWIG has D

Re: Biggest Issue with D - Definition and Versioning

On 20 January 2012 14:47, bearophile wrote: > Manu: > > > I am quite sad that a lot of the > > broken things in there now are un-fixable. > > If you want to write a short list of such broken things... :-) > > Bye, > bearophile > Renaming receiveOnly() to receive() is a trivial example. I have en

Re: wxWidgets good news

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:24:19 -0800 bls wrote: > Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D > bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this > happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, Thank you very much for the news!! > Generating C functional wrappers is a

Re: wxWidgets good news

2012/1/20 bls > As you may have noticed, SWIG has D support. Means : No need to manually > re-create C++ classes in D. > > Holy crap. > > Ah, kudos to David Nadlinger.

Re: Biggest Issue with D - Definition and Versioning

Le 20/01/2012 13:47, bearophile a écrit : Manu: I am quite sad that a lot of the broken things in there now are un-fixable. If you want to write a short list of such broken things... :-) Bye, bearophile toString to begin with. This isn't const compliant. Just like a big part of the standa

Re: wxWidgets good news

On 01/20/2012 05:33 AM, Jimmy Cao wrote: 2012/1/20 bls mailto:bizp...@orange.fr>> As you may have noticed, SWIG has D support. Means : No need to manually re-create C++ classes in D. Holy crap. Ah, kudos to David Nadlinger. Ya sorry David , I couldn't remember your name. Gues

Re: Message-Passing

On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 13:10:37 UTC, Manu wrote: On 20 January 2012 00:36, Sean Kelly wrote: Thanks :-) If you have ideas on how it could be improved, please let me know. On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Nathan M. Swan wrote: > I want to applaud Sean Kelly and everyone who worked on

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

El 20/01/2012 10:15, Jonathan M Davis escribió: On Friday, January 20, 2012 09:58:42 Marco Leise wrote: Ah, I meant to say that getters should not modify their object. When I see "a = abc.x[i]" I would be a little surprised to find that it changes the observable state of abc. The same goes for "

Re: wxWidgets good news

On 01/20/2012 03:24 AM, bls wrote: Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/master/docs/doxygen/scripts/make_bindings.py Gene

Re: wxWidgets good news

On 01/20/2012 04:51 AM, Trass3r wrote: Generating C functional wrappers is already pretty cool, but the fantastic news is SWIG output! As you may have noticed, SWIG has D support. Means : No need to manually re-create C++ classes in D. Does SWIG D support static linking by now? From the docs

[OT] Programming language WATs

Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for WATs you can do in D. -- Robert http://octarineparrot.com/

Re: wxWidgets good news

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:10:20 -0800 bls wrote: > Which wxWidget Version ? > IMO at least 2.9x to avoid the UNICODE - non UNICODE stress. Probably > 2.9.4 is the best choice (doxygen wise) which will arrive AFAIK in > February. I agree. > How to setup the project ? just the modified Python scrip

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On 01/20/2012 04:40 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote: Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for WATs you can do in D. I think there are no spectacular WATs in D, but I'll give

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote: > Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: > > https://www.**destroyallsoftware.com/talks/**wat > > Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for > WATs you can d

Re: wxWidgets good news

On 1/20/12, bls wrote: > Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D > bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this > happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, > https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/master/docs/doxygen/scripts/make_bindings.py All files

Re: Invariant and pre/post-conditions order

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:01:40 -0500, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/19/2012 8:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: If they are related, yes it does give you more information. The out condition might not check the class data directly, but the error which caused the invariant to fail could have also

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Friday, January 20, 2012 15:13:51 Alvaro wrote: > Well, there is the case of std::map and its [] operator which adds an > element if it does not exist. Even if in the right hand side: > > a = map[x]; // modifies map if x was not found in it > > Maybe Marco is talking about something like that.

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:29:12 -0500, Peter Alexander wrote: On 20/01/12 12:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:41:44 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/19/12 4:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:06:00 -0500, torhu wrote: If the type of by

Re: Why the Standard Library

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:46:43 -0500, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Thursday, 19 January 2012 at 22:49:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: It is in the works: https://github.com/schveiguy/phobos/commit/9ee5034f446877b0e78fec608271084d289f6345 -Steve Be sure to change the module declaration. O

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 1/17/12 12:48 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I hate I must ask this: int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey) { ... } or int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey()) { ... } Thanks, Andrei "I told you" Alexandrescu I tallied the votes. Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivi

Re: Message-Passing

On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Manu wrote: > > I had some troubles with std.concurrency which I thought it might be nice to > address. > > Perhaps the most major problem I had was related to the concept of thread > ownership. If a spawned threads parent thread dies, it also receives a signal > t

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:58:28 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/17/12 12:48 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I hate I must ask this: int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey) { ... } or int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey()) { ... } Thanks, Andrei "I told you" Alexandrescu I tallied

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Friday, January 20, 2012 15:40:43 Robert Clipsham wrote: > Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: > > https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Hilarious! - Jonathan M Davis

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On Friday, January 20, 2012 11:58:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 1/17/12 12:48 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > I hate I must ask this: > > > > int[string] aa; > > foreach (k; aa.byKey) { ... } > > > > or > > > > int[string] aa; > > foreach (k; aa.byKey()) { ... } > > > > > > > > Thanks

Re: Invariant and pre/post-conditions order

Walter Bright wrote: > I recently fixed the specs to define the sequence. Then the Status Quo holds. One more remark: if the intention still is, that contracts are to be seen as an executable description of at least parts of the design, then the current specification of the language does not g

Re: wxWidgets good news

On 01/20/2012 09:02 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: On 1/20/12, bls wrote: Hi, it seems that the idea of using doxygen xml output to generate D bindings was not that bad. I am pretty happy to see that exactly this happens in wxWidgets 2.9.4, https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/master/docs/do

Re: Invariant and pre/post-conditions order

On 1/20/2012 10:42 AM, Manfred Nowak wrote: if the intention still is, that contracts are to be seen as an executable description of at least parts of the design, then the current specification of the language does not give any control over those contracts to the designers. This is because the c

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On 1/20/2012 8:43 AM, Brad Anderson wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Robert Clipsham mailto:rob...@octarineparrot.com>> wrote: Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages

Re: wxWidgets good news

Hi, > > > > All files in that folder are dated July 2009. Is there some newer > > script you were referring to? > > > > Wish I am able to send you more recent code :( > check the Phoenix project in wxWidgets SVN. It doesn't generate SWIG though, it generates SIP. But the infrastructure could b

Re: C++ pimpl

On 1/20/2012 2:12 AM, Robert Caravani wrote: First of all thanks for this fast answer! On 1/19/2012 12:48 PM, Roberto Caravani wrote: I think this would be a real neat and very important feature, when it comes to shared libraries. Is there any plan to implement something like that in the futur

Re: wxWidgets doxygen binding creation.

Hi Andrej, From : http://wxphp.org/wxphp/blog/commit-of-new-version " Theres a new xml parser as I wrote in some older news that extract the details of wxWidgets *doxoygen* documentation. " -> The doxygen xml files can be used to create D bindings .

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 01/20/2012 01:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Friday, January 20, 2012 11:58:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/17/12 12:48 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I hate I must ask this: int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey) { ... } or int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey()) { ... } Thanks,

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 01/20/2012 06:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/17/12 12:48 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I hate I must ask this: int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey) { ... } or int[string] aa; foreach (k; aa.byKey()) { ... } Thanks, Andrei "I told you" Alexandrescu I tallied the votes. Func

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

Andrei Alexandrescu: > I tallied the votes. > > Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivier Pisano, Ary > Manzana, torhu. > > Property: Nick Sabalausky, Simen Kjaeraas. > > I wasn't able to discern a clear vote from the others. Please correct > the list. I vote for byKey and b

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

20.01.2012 19:40, Robert Clipsham пишет: Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Good talk! But with a mistake: there are 15 delimiters in 16 element array (printing/join result), not 16.

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 20/01/12 5:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I tallied the votes. Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivier Pisano, Ary Manzana, torhu. Property: Nick Sabalausky, Simen Kjaeraas. I wasn't able to discern a clear vote from the others. Please correct the list. I vote functi

Re: wxWidgets doxygen binding creation.

I began porting those php scripts to D since yesterday. They are well documented and modularized so I think it's worth having a go at it. Oddly enough I've cloned the wxPhp svn repo yesterday without even knowing they've just merged these new changes in at the same time. Cool. You've mentioned tho

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

"Robert Clipsham" wrote in message news:jfc1ts$2hck$1...@digitalmars.com... > Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: > > https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat > OMGWTFBBQ! I ROFLed! (That really was hilarious.) > Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus po

Re: wxWidgets doxygen binding creation.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:09:48 +0100 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > I began porting those php scripts to D since yesterday. They are well > documented and modularized so I think it's worth having a go at it. > Oddly enough I've cloned the wxPhp svn repo yesterday without even > knowing they've just merge

Re: wxWidgets doxygen binding creation.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Gour wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:09:48 +0100 > Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > > > I began porting those php scripts to D since yesterday. They are well > > documented and modularized so I think it's worth having a go at it. > > Oddly enough I've cloned the wxPhp sv

Bug tracking and assigned to

So I've been thinking about helping out with fixing some bugs in dmd. I made search in the bug tracker for bugs with NEW state but quickly noticed that a lot of them are actually already being worked on or have a pending pull request. It would be great if the state was changed to ASSIGNED. I

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

"jdrewsen" wrote in message news:ybillabaoehmexgjo...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... > > So I've been thinking about helping out with fixing some bugs in dmd. I > made search in the bug tracker for bugs with NEW state but quickly noticed > that a lot of them are actually already being work

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 22:42:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: "jdrewsen" wrote in message news:ybillabaoehmexgjo...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... So I've been thinking about helping out with fixing some bugs in dmd. I made search in the bug tracker for bugs with NEW state but quic

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

"jdrewsen" wrote in message news:wosqwyhggkzugyfpq...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... > On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 22:42:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "jdrewsen" wrote in message >> news:ybillabaoehmexgjo...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... >>> >>> So I've been thinking about help

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

On 1/20/2012 3:12 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "jdrewsen" wrote in message > news:wosqwyhggkzugyfpq...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... >> On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 22:42:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> "jdrewsen" wrote in message >>> news:ybillabaoehmexgjo...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybersh

Re: 64Bit compatibility warnings

On 20/01/2012 00:46, Peter Alexander wrote: On 20/01/12 12:25 AM, Trass3r wrote: Could we please have at least a warning if code isn't compatible with 64Bit? It's really annoying to test out some code and having to fix a bunch of stupid uint->size_t bugs just because the author is still on a 32

Re: 64Bit compatibility warnings

On 01/21/2012 01:48 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote: On 20/01/2012 00:46, Peter Alexander wrote: On 20/01/12 12:25 AM, Trass3r wrote: Could we please have at least a warning if code isn't compatible with 64Bit? It's really annoying to test out some code and having to fix a bunch of stupid uint->size_t

Re: 64Bit compatibility warnings

On 21/01/2012 01:16, Timon Gehr wrote: I generally like the idea of making size_t strongly typed, but that would necessitate X!size_t to become a distinct instantiation from X!uint or X!ulong. Furthermore, it would break all existing D programs that are deliberately not 64 bit aware =). You

Re: 64Bit compatibility warnings

On 01/20/2012 08:21 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote: On 21/01/2012 01:16, Timon Gehr wrote: I generally like the idea of making size_t strongly typed, but that would necessitate X!size_t to become a distinct instantiation from X!uint or X!ulong. Furthermore, it would break all existing D programs that

Re: 64Bit compatibility warnings

On 01/20/2012 08:24 PM, Matt Soucy wrote: On 01/20/2012 08:21 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote: On 21/01/2012 01:16, Timon Gehr wrote: I generally like the idea of making size_t strongly typed, but that would necessitate X!size_t to become a distinct instantiation from X!uint or X!ulong. Furthermore,

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 2012-01-20 17:58:28 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said: I tallied the votes. Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivier Pisano, Ary Manzana, torhu. Property: Nick Sabalausky, Simen Kjaeraas. I wasn't able to discern a clear vote from the others. Please correct the list.

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 1/20/12 7:31 PM, Michel Fortin wrote: On 2012-01-20 17:58:28 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said: I tallied the votes. Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivier Pisano, Ary Manzana, torhu. Property: Nick Sabalausky, Simen Kjaeraas. I wasn't able to discern a clear vote from

Re: byKey and byValue: properties or methods?

On 2012-01-21 01:43:17 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said: On 1/20/12 7:31 PM, Michel Fortin wrote: On 2012-01-20 17:58:28 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said: I tallied the votes. Function: Mail Mantis, bearophile, Jacob Carlborg, Olivier Pisano, Ary Manzana, torhu. Property: Nick Sabalausky,

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

Probably Windows-only: void main() { string a = "foo"; "foo" = "bar"; writeln(a); // "foo" assert(a == "foo"); // failure }

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

To give you a hint: void main() { "foo" = "bar"; writeln("foo"); }

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On 01/20/2012 08:44 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: Probably Windows-only: void main() { string a = "foo"; "foo" = "bar"; writeln(a); // "foo" assert(a == "foo"); // failure } I think this is a bug. This causes a segmentation fault on Linux DMD 2.057. Plus, assigning a litera

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Saturday, January 21, 2012 03:44:53 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > Probably Windows-only: > > void main() > { > string a = "foo"; > "foo" = "bar"; > writeln(a); // "foo" > assert(a == "foo"); // failure > } Yeah. I don't understand why string literals aren't treated as fully immuta

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message news:mailman.640.1327115503.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > On Saturday, January 21, 2012 03:44:53 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> Probably Windows-only: >> >> void main() >> { >> string a = "foo"; >> "foo" = "bar"; >> writeln(a); // "foo" >>

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Friday, January 20, 2012 22:14:43 Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message > news:mailman.640.1327115503.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > > > On Saturday, January 21, 2012 03:44:53 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > >> Probably Windows-only: > >> > >> void main() > >> { > >>

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

"Brad Roberts" wrote in message news:mailman.637.1327101984.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > > To be more general than paying attention to Nick's specific issues.. > paying attention to the various attributes that are > available: priority, severity, and vote count. Each of those is easy

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 03:18:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: Yeah. String literals should definitely be immutable rvalues, consider this though: auto a = "hello"; a = "new"; If is("hello" == immutable(char[])), then a would be too, and the rebinding would fail. That'd be annoying.

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On 01/21/2012 04:17 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Friday, January 20, 2012 22:14:43 Nick Sabalausky wrote: "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message news:mailman.640.1327115503.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... On Saturday, January 21, 2012 03:44:53 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: Probably Windows-only

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 15:40:44 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Curious: anyone here checked out the author's screencasts? I found this video amusing so I looked at the others, but he wants money for it. Worth the ten bucks?

Re: [OT] [ot Programming language WATs

On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 15:40:44 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote: Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for WATs you can do in D.

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Saturday, January 21, 2012 04:20:36 Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 03:18:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > Yeah. String literals should definitely be immutable rvalues, > > consider this though: > > auto a = "hello"; > a = "new"; > > If is("hello" == immutable(c

Re: Github and Bugzilla Integration

Some of you may have noticed that Brad Roberts has configured bugzilla so it gets notifications from github when fixes get pushed. This makes things easier and more consistent. Just be sure and use "Issue " somewhere in the commit message when checking in a fix for bugzilla . Use "Is

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 15:40:44 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote: >> >> https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat > > > > Curious: anyone here checked out the author's screencasts? > > I found this video amusing so I looked at the others,

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 03:43:50 UTC, Caligo wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpZtX32sKVE Oh my, don't get me started on college! I'm so happy I dropped out of that waste.

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

"Caligo" wrote in message news:mailman.643.1327117430.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > > You could watch this for free, but it's not amusing. I know, I just > graduated. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpZtX32sKVE Just watched the first 3 minutes. Out of everything in there, there was

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 15:40:44 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote: Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for WATs you can do in D. void main() { import std.stdio;

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote: > Just came across this amusing 4 minute video: > > https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat > > Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus points for > WATs you can do in D. > > -- > Robert > http://octarineparrot.co

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message news:rjmwboyrrzxbbsjka...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... > On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 03:43:50 UTC, Caligo wrote: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpZtX32sKVE > > Oh my, don't get me started on college! > > I'm so happy I dropped out of that waste. I t

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

One of the first bugs I've filed (now 1.5+ years old): void main() { float[] arr = [1.0, 2.5, 4.0]; foreach (ref double elem; arr) { elem /= 2; } writeln(arr); // still [1, 2.5, 4] } Issue 4510

Re: [OT] Programming language WATs

This issue left me with a permanent avoidance of ref foreach after encountering it the first day I used D. On 20/01/2012 10:25 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: One of the first bugs I've filed (now 1.5+ years old): void main() { float[] arr = [1.0, 2.5, 4.0]; foreach (ref double elem; arr)

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

On 20/01/2012 5:26 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: To be more general than paying attention to Nick's specific issues.. paying attention to the various attributes that are available: priority, severity, and vote count. Each of those is easy to search on and sort by. I fully agree with the difficulty

Re: Bug tracking and assigned to

On 1/20/2012 8:33 PM, Kapps wrote: > On 20/01/2012 5:26 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: >> To be more general than paying attention to Nick's specific issues.. paying >> attention to the various attributes that are >> available: priority, severity, and vote count. Each of those is easy to >> search on

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 04:20:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: The "college == good" brainwashing MUST STOP, period Aye. What's incredible is I've hard these arguments on other websites, and a *lot* of people fight it. Alas, I'm watching this video still, and it gets way too political as

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 04:20:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: "Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message news:rjmwboyrrzxbbsjka...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 03:43:50 UTC, Caligo wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpZtX32sKVE Oh my, don't get me start

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message news:ykmzlppuwncgmvgzs...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... > On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 04:20:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> The "college == good" brainwashing MUST STOP, period > > Aye. What's incredible is I've hard these arguments on > other websites

Re: [OT] destroy all software (was Programming language WATs)

"F i L" wrote in message news:szaqbqghgbzolydww...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net... > > I never went to college and I feel no worse for wear for it. At 24, around > an age I would be graduating, I'm glad I'm not looking at spending a > quarter of my income on school loans. If you were *luck