Yeah my port is very much still alpha. I don't yet know what to do
about the fact that parallel builds are awfully broken. xfBuild uses
associative arrays and modifies them on-the-fly in multiple threads,
and this causes synchronization issues.
To be fair, at the time I didn't really know that
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 00:53:51 UTC, James Miller wrote:
There are a potentially infinite number of possible
configurations,
and sites need to be aimed at the lowest-common denominator.
Doesn't
look right with an enlarged font size? Tough.
So the joke about standard font size isn't
You mentioned tasks, what I was missing a bit is taskPool.put, since
Task.executeInNewThread creates a new internal Pool, which is not what
always want. Then would be interesting how you check, if the pool's
tasks have all finished (I didnt find any method doing this, to emulate
this, I used
On 2/21/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
To be fair, at the time I didn't really know that Tango was going to
be ported to D2 and that it will work well.
Actually I just wasn't paying attention, Tango for D2 was released
before I did the port. Heh.
On 21 February 2012 23:29, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 00:53:51 UTC, James Miller wrote:
There are a potentially infinite number of possible configurations,
and sites need to be aimed at the lowest-common denominator. Doesn't
look right with an enlarged font
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:52:04 +0100
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
As I understand it, CWrap provides more than just bindings for a C
function.
Right, but, afaik, SWIG can also make more than wrapper for a C function
by using typemaps, %exception etc.
Does it mean that dstep is only tool
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 00:53:51 UTC, James Miller wrote:
Doesn't look right with an enlarged font size? Tough.
It's a question of gain per effort. Issues due to non-standard
font sizes seem to come up often enough to warrant investigating,
and I admit I've completely disregarded
On 02/21/2012 03:03 AM, David wrote:
You mentioned tasks, what I was missing a bit is taskPool.put,
Thank you David. I will add the rest of the TaskPool member functions.
since
Task.executeInNewThread creates a new internal Pool, which is not what
always want. Then would be interesting how
On 2012-02-21 13:12, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:52:04 +0100
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
As I understand it, CWrap provides more than just bindings for a C
function.
Right, but, afaik, SWIG can also make more than wrapper for a C function
by using typemaps, %exception etc.
Does
I can't Private Message you so I'm just going to say it out loud.
If you guys are planning a forum software solution. And your
emphasis is on d I would buy dBulletin.com It's for sale to the
highest bidder.
I originally found this domain from this site:
http://www.webmarketingtalk.com/
So get
Am 21.02.2012 18:28, schrieb Ali Çehreli:
Good questions for D.learn, where I will learn myself. :)
Ali
I think I should subscribe to it ;)
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Thanks Walter. Thanks Andrei. You too, smiley face.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Great talk!
We want to have many users.
dUsers ~= (juanManuel);
:-) :-) :-)
--jm
On 02/21/2012 09:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
James Miller ja...@aatch.net wrote in message
news:mailman.775.1329824618.20196.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I completely agree. And it's hell for you when you're forced to support
IE because more than 50% of the customers use IE.
if I have to type !--[if IE 6] ever again it will
I thought GDC was going to be part of GCC 4.7, but Andrei in the video
said 4.8. That's another year, :-(
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 02:12:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Plus, it's a pain to have multiple versions of IE installed (if
You don't need it! IE's compatibility mode is very good,
including emulating old bugs.
If you turn on compatibility mode you can tell pretty well
if your site
dbulletin dbulle...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:nvmhanxzfuqgnrrji...@forum.dlang.org...
I can't Private Message you so I'm just going to say it out loud.
If you guys are planning a forum software solution. And your
emphasis is on d I would buy dBulletin.com It's for sale to the
highest
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 02:21:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Really? I didn't know there was such a thing. Is this a setting
in one of
the (*cough*increasingly hidden*cough*) options screens, or
something you
add to the HTML?
You can get it both ways. X-UA-Compatible in html (or
On 2/21/12 6:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
On reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/q09su/c9goingnative_6_the_d_episode_with_walter_bright/
Andrei
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:ji1dfl$17ha$1...@digitalmars.com...
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Great video. It's espcially nice to see an entire one of these videos
On 2012-02-22 03:11, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
James Millerja...@aatch.net wrote in message
news:mailman.775.1329824618.20196.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I completely agree. And it's hell for you when you're forced to support
IE because more than 50% of the customers use IE.
if I
You need to enable it.
H. S. Teoh wrote in message
news:mailman.748.1329787800.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:38:47PM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 6:25 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 00:19:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
Many only know the UNIX version of Linux or BSD, but lets not forget the
idiosyncrasies any developer faces when having to support multiple
commercial
UNIX systems in spite of standards like POSIX.
I still remember the first time I loggeded into an HP-UX system in a
production system
at one
On 2012-02-20 21:23, James Miller wrote:
On 21 February 2012 09:02, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-02-20 17:17, Daniel Murphy wrote:
H. S. Teohhst...@quickfur.ath.cxwrote in message
news:mailman.667.1329753569.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I've suggested before, and
They did, but Microsoft way as usual.
SSH in Windows, means making use of Powershell remote access. SSH is only
meant
for UNIX compatibility and it works better if SUA (UNIX personality) is also
installed.
--
Paulo
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
All of this heated debate has led me to reconsider our whole concept of
exceptions. It seems that we're squabbling over little details in
existing paradigms. But what of the big picture? What *is* an exception
anyway? We all know the textbook definition, but clearly something is
missing since we
On 2012-02-20 21:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teohhst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.704.1329767254.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:36:56PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/20/12, Juan Manuel Cabojuanmanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
will
On 02/21/12 04:12, James Miller wrote:
If the only problem is that we need some more types, can't we add them
in? I don't see the problem with having verbose, import-only names for
things outside the norm, alias them if you want, longer names are
better for newcomers. For example, what is
Andre Tampubolon an...@lc.vlsm.org wrote:
I just fetched the latest source code, and when I was trying to build dmd, I
got this:
func.c: In member function ‘MATCH
FuncDeclaration::leastAsSpecialized(FuncDeclaration*)’:
func.c:2493:45: error: no matching function for call to
On 21 February 2012 01:00, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:25:28PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2012 22:36:49 Benjamin Thaut wrote:
1) Is there a chance that dmd will support 64 bit on windows any
time soon? What are the
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jhvja0$vkq$1...@digitalmars.com...
libclang is awesome, so libdmd should be /more/ awesome, right?
--
James Miller
Yes, even more awesome, and written in D :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Would be much easier to create and keep in sync if it was
Am 20.02.2012 22:11, schrieb Juan Manuel Cabo:
Yeah.. that is a problem! :-) Thanks for liking the idea, now we can
talk about the fine details!!
One way is to not let the user direct access to the associative array,
but wrap the e.info[MyDetail] call in a nothrow function, such as
Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.670.1329756860.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
If i recall correctly this is the third thread that ended with we
need a D front-end.
Making a good front-end will mean a very significant step forward
towards a good
On 20/02/12 22:16, Don wrote:
On 19.02.2012 22:35, bearophile wrote:
This is a recent fix:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7481
but I suggest to revert it, or improve it significantly, because I am
seeing avalanches of error messages, that slow down my
compilation-fix-run cycle
I just fetched the latest source code, and when I was trying to build dmd, I
got this:
func.c: In member function ‘MATCH
FuncDeclaration::leastAsSpecialized(FuncDeclaration*)’:
func.c:2493:45: error: no matching function for call to
‘Type::defaultInitLiteral()’
func.c:2493:45: note: candidate
On 21 February 2012 01:22, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/20/2012 3:28 AM, Manu wrote:
Even size_t is often
broken in C. I have worked on 64bit systems with 32bit pointers where
size_t was
still 64bit, but ptrdiff_t was 32bit (I think PS3 is like this, but maybe
my
On 2/20/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Actually, even that isn't ideal. How is the translator to know what on
earth {0} and {1} are?
Sorry, I didn't mean this in the concept of exceptions but generally
when calling writefln format. This exceptions thread has exploded so
fast I
Am 21.02.2012 09:15, schrieb H. S. Teoh:
Sorry for this super-long post
perfect length, helps to clean the brain and focus on the real problems
again
On 2012-02-21 01:51, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:19:32PM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 5:46 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
You've suggested adding Variant[string] info to Exception for the
sake of i18n. I think that's what he's referring to. You *could*
argue
Le 20/02/2012 21:57, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 2/20/12 1:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2012 20:42:28 deadalnix wrote:
Le 20/02/2012 20:27, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Monday, February 20, 2012 11:15:08 H. S. Teoh wrote:
That's why I proposed to use runtime
On Saturday, 18 February 2012 at 18:52:05 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
From experience I humbly submit that catching by type is most
of the time useless.
Completely disagree. Types allow to control place for catch.
Say, some deeply nested function catches its own exceptions,
while outer
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:23:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/20/12 7:02 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
oops, sorry!! I just saw a post by someone named Jose. My
thousand apollogies!!
I got confused. It was your argument I meant to refer to -
adding info to the exception in
First great post. Don't be sorry, it is insightful. The Condition
catgory make a lot of sense to me.
Le 21/02/2012 09:15, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
Currently, I'm still unsure whether Conditions and Exceptions should be
unified, or they should be kept separate; deadalnix recommended they be
kept
Le 21/02/2012 11:40, Vincent a écrit :
On Saturday, 18 February 2012 at 18:52:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
From experience I humbly submit that catching by type is most of the
time useless.
Completely disagree. Types allow to control place for catch. Say, some
deeply nested function
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other languages/scripting languages.
For instance, I'm thinking about Android, I have JNI binding code
everywhere, it's really ugly.
I'd
On 2012-02-21 03:34, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 6:51 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:19:32PM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 5:46 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
You've suggested adding Variant[string] info to Exception for the
sake of i18n. I think
This is just what I needed. I need to create a new calling convention
to implement dynamic data typing without resorting to incredibly slow
and cumbersome Variant.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious
On 19/02/12 22:35, bearophile wrote:
This is a recent fix:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7481
but I suggest to revert it, or improve it significantly, because I am seeing
avalanches of error messages, that slow down my compilation-fix-run cycle and
are useless to me and
On 21 February 2012 13:19, Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.comwrote:
This is just what I needed. I need to create a new calling convention
to implement dynamic data typing without resorting to incredibly slow
and cumbersome Variant.
Umm, I am of course talking about a compile-time
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:04:59 -, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/19/12 4:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Seriously, how is this not *already* crystal-clear? I feel as if every
few
weeks you're just coming up with deliberately random shit to argue so
the
kennytm kenn...@gmail.com wrote:
Andre Tampubolon an...@lc.vlsm.org wrote:
I just fetched the latest source code, and when I was trying to build dmd, I
got this:
func.c: In member function ‘MATCH
FuncDeclaration::leastAsSpecialized(FuncDeclaration*)’:
func.c:2493:45: error: no matching
Why can't you do that with existing language features?
alias JniExternFunc!(void function(int)) someJNIFuncYouWantToCallFromD;
mixin JniExportFunc!(dFuncYouWantToCallUsingJNI);
Where the templates generate the wrapper code/calling convention arg shuffle
for each function.
On 21 February 2012 14:13, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Why can't you do that with existing language features?
alias JniExternFunc!(void function(int)) someJNIFuncYouWantToCallFromD;
mixin JniExportFunc!(dFuncYouWantToCallUsingJNI);
Where the templates generate the wrapper
On 02/21/12 12:03, Manu wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other languages/scripting languages.
For instance, I'm thinking about Android, I have JNI binding
On 21 February 2012 11:03, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other languages/scripting languages.
For instance, I'm thinking about
On 2012-02-20 23:44, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
I still don't like the idea of using Variant[string], though.
(1) It doesn't allow compile-time type checking. This is a big minus, in
my book.
When you need compile-time type checking, define a variable in your class.
Just make sure that you are
On 21 February 2012 14:33, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 21 February 2012 11:03, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 16:23:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 19 February 2012 18:03, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.netwrote:
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 15:26:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
There is code that assumes size_t is the width of the pointer
When is this not true? I can only
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:08:07 -0600, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 8:33 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
Variant e = new MyException();
writeln( e.filename, e.line, e.column);
Aren't __traits and opDispatch
Yes, I;m also talking about compile-time feature. Dynamic typing
certainly doesn't require dynamic calling conventions.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2012 13:19, Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is just what I needed. I
On 2/21/12 4:48 AM, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:23:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 7:02 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
oops, sorry!! I just saw a post by someone named Jose. My thousand
apollogies!!
I got confused. It was your argument I meant to refer to -
On 2/21/12 4:34 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 20/02/2012 21:57, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
class DRoxException : Exception
{
mixin(enableRTTI);
... normal implementation ...
}
Andrei
Why not using std.rtti and generate run time reflection info from
compile time reflexion capability ?
This
On 2/21/12 4:40 AM, Vincent wrote:
On Saturday, 18 February 2012 at 18:52:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
From experience I humbly submit that catching by type is most of the
time useless.
Completely disagree. Types allow to control place for catch. Say, some
deeply nested function catches
On 2/21/12 5:19 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
This is just what I needed. I need to create a new calling convention
to implement dynamic data typing without resorting to incredibly slow
and cumbersome Variant.
If Variant is incredibly slow, that's a bug. It's a tagged union so for
many types
On 2/21/12 5:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-21 03:34, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the correct way of handling this is provide enough information
in the exception so a message can be built where the exception is
caught.
Quite so. I'd add using a unified interface so reusable
On 2/21/12 5:55 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:04:59 -, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/19/12 4:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Seriously, how is this not *already* crystal-clear? I feel as if
every few
weeks you're just coming up with
On 2/21/12 6:36 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-20 23:44, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
I still don't like the idea of using Variant[string], though.
(1) It doesn't allow compile-time type checking. This is a big minus, in
my book.
When you need compile-time type checking, define a variable
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 14:13:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/21/12 4:48 AM, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:23:58 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 7:02 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
oops, sorry!! I just saw a post by someone named Jose. My
thousand
On 2012-02-20 22:36, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
3) Am I mistaken or are most of the people here using dmd under linux?
General bugs or linux only bugs tend to get fixed a lot faster then
windows only bugs.
Mac OS X here.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 02/21/12 09:15, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Sorry for this super-long post, but I wanted to lay my ideas out in a
coherent fashion so that we can discuss its conceptual aspects without
getting lost with arguing about the details. I hope this is a step in
the right direction toward a better model of
On 2/21/12 8:38 AM, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 14:13:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/21/12 4:48 AM, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:23:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/20/12 7:02 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
oops, sorry!! I just saw a post by
On 2012-02-21 09:14, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message
news:jhvja0$vkq$1...@digitalmars.com...
libclang is awesome, so libdmd should be /more/ awesome, right?
--
James Miller
Yes, even more awesome, and written in D :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Would be much
On 2012-02-21 11:03:09 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other languages/scripting languages.
For instance, I'm thinking about
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:33:15 UTC, Robert Jacques
wrote:
Nope. See
(https://jshare.johnshopkins.edu/rjacque2/public_html/ )
Any luck in getting the required patches into phobos?
I'd love to see this full thing in there for the next release.
It rox.
There are cases where i don't need type checking per Variant. In case
of dynamic function calls, the parameters would be passed to a
template, which would generate a TypeInfo of a function, with those
parameter types and will compare with TypeInfo of the underlying
function, effectively making
This works:
// note: the int parameter above isn't static
dbConn.query(select age from people where id='foobar');
throw new WithErrorCode!FileNotFoundException(
db.rs.getValue(1), file not found);
...
Can you offer a real world use-case where the above isn't sufficient?
What
Any D type can be stored in size_t.sizeof * 2 bytes of storage and
every type can be stored in that storage directly with the exception
of static arrays, which are stored as synamic arrays and large
structures, which are copied to the heap and stored by pointer. These
size_t.sizeof * 2 bytes
Le 21/02/2012 11:55, deadalnix a écrit :
First great post. Don't be sorry, it is insightful. The Condition
catgory make a lot of sense to me.
Le 21/02/2012 09:15, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
Currently, I'm still unsure whether Conditions and Exceptions should be
unified, or they should be kept
I think he meant to say things have been like that for a while and there's no
blood in the streets.
That's exactly what I meant.
And even if one makes those fields private, anyone can take a pointer
to the class or void[] or whatever and do a mess. (Java isn't exepmpt,
you can do a mess with
On 2012-02-21 15:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/21/12 5:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-21 03:34, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the correct way of handling this is provide enough information
in the exception so a message can be built where the exception is
caught.
Quite so.
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:epzlyfzibmpuoilaw...@forum.dlang.org...
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 00:38:46 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
ssh into Windows and... well last time I did it it was like welcome to
Hell.
Oh, certainly!
Does anyone suppose it
Never mind modifying fields of the exception at some intermediate catch place.
Someone could even catch the exception and not rethrow it.
So: do some trusting. Life gets easier :-)
--jm
On 02/21/2012 12:46 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
I think he meant to say things have been like that for a
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 15:38:15 UTC, Juan Manuel Cabo
wrote:
This works:
// note: the int parameter above isn't static
dbConn.query(select age from people where id='foobar');
throw new WithErrorCode!FileNotFoundException(
db.rs.getValue(1), file not found);
...
Can you offer
FileNotFoundException is the super class of the others so the first catch
clause is enough. in fact, the others will
never be called if listed in the above order.
Nice! I missed that. But what if you want to add ErrorCode and Rainbows?
And with your approach, one has to test for type and
Also, you would lose the stacktrace by rethrowing with a different exception
object.
(Currently, the stacktrace is lost by rethrowing the same object, but the
Exception.file
and Exception.line are not lost, and it seems that it is very easy to not lose
the
stacktrace when rethrowing, and it is
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 14:56:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Can you offer a real world use-case where the above isn't
sufficient?
This has been discussed. A function would want to add
contextual information to an exception and rethrow it.
Requiring a new type for each such
On 2/21/12 10:39 AM, foobar wrote:
Regarding the downcast - you still perform a check in the code above!
You gained nothing by replacing a type check with a check on a
hash.
You do gain because capability checks don't force a tree structure,
whereas downcasting does.
Regarding composition
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:54:30PM +0100, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 02/21/12 09:15, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Sorry for this super-long post, but I wanted to lay my ideas out in a
coherent fashion so that we can discuss its conceptual aspects without
getting lost with arguing about the details. I
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.740.1329784653.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:21:33AM +0100, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 20 February 2012 at 23:12:36 UTC, James Miller wrote:
Windows has not, historically, been a pleasant
throw new WithRainbows!withErrorCode!withFoobar!FileNotFoundException(...);
So:
catch (WithRainbows!withErrorCode!withFoobar!FileNotFoundException ex) {
} catch (WithRainbows!withErrorCode!withFoobar!FileNotFoundException ex) {
} catch
Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/18/2012 3:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/18/12 4:26 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote (abridged):
GetOptException
FlagArgumentMissingException
InvalidFlagArgumentException
UnknownFlagException
FileException
FileNotFoundException
NotFileException
NotDirException
On 2/21/12 10:50 AM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
I thought that an alternative to Variant[string] would be to have some virtual
functions overrideable (getExceptionData(string dataName) or something).
but they would all have to return Object or Variant, so it's the same thing.
Exactly. By and
Le 21/02/2012 17:56, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
The only thing I added, perhaps, is that instead of problem-specific
conditions, as they appear to have in Lisp, I'm looking at generic
categories of conditions, that you can handle from high-level code
without ever needing to know the specifics of
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Manu wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other languages/scripting languages.
For instance, I'm thinking about Android,
On 21 February 2012 16:59, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2012-02-21 11:03:09 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:01:09PM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 17:56, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
The only thing I added, perhaps, is that instead of problem-specific
conditions, as they appear to have in Lisp, I'm looking at generic
categories of conditions, that you can handle from
On 21 February 2012 19:02, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Manu wrote:
So I was thinking about this extern(language) thing, the obvious ones are
supported, but it would be really nice to be able to implement custom
conventions for other
On 21-02-2012 18:03, Manu wrote:
On 21 February 2012 16:59, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com
mailto:michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2012-02-21 11:03:09 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com said:
So I was thinking about this extern(language)
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
