Am Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:02:01 +0100
schrieb Juan Manuel Cabo juanmanuel.c...@gmail.com:
On Friday, 23 March 2012 at 05:16:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
[.]
(man, the gaussian curve is everywhere, it never ceases to
perplex me).
I'm actually surprised. I'm working on
On 3/23/12 5:42 PM, Manfred Nowak wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
In the limit, taking the minimum over infinitely many
measurements of X would yield T.
True, if the thoretical variance of the distribution of T is close to
zero. But horrible wrong, if T depends on an algorithm that is fast
Cullen,
I think the ideas page sums it up pretty well. Matrix factorizations,
sparse matrices and general polish and bug fixing are the main goals I
had in mind, though we're definitely open to any other ideas you may
have. As someone with a strong math background, you could add a lot of
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
some docs:
http://arsdnet.net/web.d/cgi.html
http://arsdnet.net/web.d/cgi.d.html
The file cgi.d in there is my base library for web apps.
Previously, it spoke regular CGI, FastCGI (with help
from a C lib) and
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this
as a template parameter? Why not put this in a constructor. And
so on...
On 23 March 2012 21:11, Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
Something that *might* help is to do unit tests. Yeah,
that's kinda ass, but it would catch a stray virtual early.
They're not necessarily 'stray' virtuals, they're inappropriate ones
There's a time and place for virtuals,
H. S. Teoh:
Someday, we have to revisit this whole const thing and how to make it
work nicely with containers... I found that it is causing 40% of my
troubles with the AA implementation. :-(
This is a very good idea, but I see two problems in it:
- Do you know someone intelligent enough to
On 03/24/2012 01:20 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:53:10PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/23/2012 10:07 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I see. An alternative solution (one that does not make AAs depend on
Phobos and is more slick) would be to use the const qualified key type
for
On 03/24/2012 12:34 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
else static if(is(T _ == shared(U),U)) alias const(getConstQual!U) r;
should be
else static if(is(T _ == shared(U),U)) alias
shared(const(getConstQual!U)) r;
But it does not matter for the AA implementation because it only uses
getConstQual with
On 03/24/2012 07:42 AM, Dan wrote:
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this as a
template parameter? Why not put this in a constructor. And so on...
You use templates in combination with CTFE if
- You have to perform computations on types.
- You want template
On 03/24/2012 03:39 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:39:35AM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I thought I'd open this topic for discussion of issues with the new
hash implementation.
[...]
Another issue:
AA!(string,int[]) aa;
auto x = aa.get(abc, []);
This fails
On 03/24/2012 12:34 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
static if(is(typeof(getConstQual!Key.init.idup):Key)){
Better:
static if(is(typeof(getConstQual!Key.init.idup):Key)
!is(getConstQual!Key: Key)){
Le 22/03/2012 19:06, Felix Hufnagel a écrit :
in addition to .codeof, let's think about .astof returning an abstract
syntax tree.
WAY better !
Le 22/03/2012 17:00, F i L a écrit :
So the discussions about Attributes and Aspect Oriented Programming
(AOP) got me thinking... Basically AOP requires injecting code fragments
together in a comprehensible way. Similarly, Attributes that go beyond
@note (such as @GC.NoScan) need similar
Hi.
I'm currently studying at University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik in
Košice, Slovakia
and I'd like to participate in this year's GSoC. I'm especially
interested
in D as I'm currently using it for my projects (I'm the author of
D:YAML - YAML
parser/emitter library for D
On 3/23/12 10:47 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/24/12, Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I've managed to test the hashes on a small-sized closed-source project
(9K lines) which used hashes a lot. I've found no issues so far (no
memory corruption or anything). Performance
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 06:50:12AM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/24/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
[...]
However, one case remains unsolved: either I can't find the right
way to express this, or the new AA template needs fixing:
AA!(string[const AA!(int[int])])
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 07:49:13AM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/23/12 10:47 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/24/12, Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I've managed to test the hashes on a small-sized closed-source
project (9K lines) which used hashes a lot. I've
On 03/23/12 20:11, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://dlang.org/traits.html#getVirtualFunctions
if the name isn't on a list of approved virtuals,
static assert fail.
And you could probably do it in a clean and unintrusive way,
by, for example, extending Object, or doing it on a per-module
basis.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/24/2012 01:20 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Hmm. I decided that perhaps the full-fledged std.conv.to is a bit of
an overkill, so I revised the AA code to compromise between needing
std.conv.to and still deliver what Andrei wants.
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 14:43:21 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
It needs at least the class or method marked as 'final' to do
the right thing.
Indeed, that's what I'm after.
I'm making another post with an implementation in reply
to manu in a minute.
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 10:56:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
My objection to virtual-by-default, but, acknowledging that
can't be changed, insistence on a virtual keyword
is this.
I like the idea of a virtual keyword btw.
Adding a system like you describe to validate virtuals is not a
complexity
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
[...]
This solution creates unnecessary template bloat for every implicit
conversion, duplicates compiler logic, and I think it does not work
correctly because of other issues. I have refined my proof of
concept.
[...]
OK, I've
I think a better system would be to explicitly mark functions are
virtual, and then use unittesting to catch virtual functions that
don't need to be.
On 03/24/12 16:16, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 10:56:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
My objection to virtual-by-default, but, acknowledging that can't be
changed, insistence on a virtual keyword
is this.
I like the idea of a virtual keyword btw.
Adding a system like you
On 3/24/12 3:03 AM, Manu wrote:
On 23 March 2012 17:24, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar
mailto:a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
On 3/18/12 9:23 AM, Manu wrote:
The virtual model broken. I've complained about it lots, and people
always say stfu, use 'final:' at the top of your
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 16:27:41 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
The question is -- are there false positives?
Yes, almost certainly. This only looks at the function
definition; it is run well before the optimizer.
Hi! I engaged in addition to dmd with runtime reflection and
there was a problem:
If we have any template class, the real instantiated only those
methods that are used.
And to сonstruct the runtime reflection, I need to instantiate
the other methods. And here is a question: how to do it.
I write
I've been upgrading to a Windows 64 bit box. Running the D test suite, I ran
into a very strange problem. Here's the program:
---
extern(C) int printf(const char*, ...);
int main()
{
byte[3] a;
byte[3] b;
byte[3] c;
a[] = b[] + c[];
On 3/24/2012 11:55 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm mystified. Does anyone have any ideas?
If I add a del test.exe to the cc.bat file:
..\dmd test
test
del test.exe
..\dmd test
---
It now fails with GetLastError() of 5, meaning Access is denied.
The cc.bat
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 19:08:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 11:55 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm mystified. Does anyone have any ideas?
If I add a del test.exe to the cc.bat file:
..\dmd test
test
del test.exe
..\dmd test
---
It now fails
On 3/24/2012 12:07 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 11:55 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm mystified. Does anyone have any ideas?
If I add a del test.exe to the cc.bat file:
..\dmd test
test
del test.exe
..\dmd test
---
It now fails with
On 3/24/2012 12:18 PM, Xinok wrote:
If you have an antivirus, try disabling it before compiling.
I have a brand new vanilla install of Windows 7 home premium.
On 3/24/2012 12:19 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
I saw this sort of behavior in the auto-tester (was win7 at the time,
At least I'm not losing my mind :-)
now it's running on a windows server 2008 box)
during the various combinations of compilation options until I switched to
adding a counter and
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jkl5ab$1ocp$1...@digitalmars.com...
I've been upgrading to a Windows 64 bit box. Running the D test suite, I
ran into a very strange problem. Here's the program:
---
extern(C) int printf(const char*,
On 3/24/2012 12:31 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of it.
See if the behavior changes if you add some delay just before the last line.
Or, if you adjust it so that compiling test.d takes longer.
I tried those. No dice.
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jkl7fd$1rqs$1...@digitalmars.com...
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of it.
See if the behavior changes if you add some delay just before the last
line. Or, if you adjust it so that compiling test.d takes longer.
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jkl816$1t08$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jkl7fd$1rqs$1...@digitalmars.com...
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of it.
See if the behavior changes if you add some delay just
On 3/24/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:31 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of it.
See if the behavior changes if you add some delay just before the last line.
Or, if you adjust it so that compiling test.d takes
On 3/24/2012 12:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:31 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of it.
See if the behavior changes if you add some delay just before the last line.
Or, if
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:48:47 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:31 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Windows is known to enjoy holding locks on files just for the fuck of
it.
See if the behavior changes if you add
While working on text processing again I made another
attempt at writing an InputRange buffer.
Instead of complex reference counting, that would be needed
to define save it only 'fixes' foreach, i.e. one can use
foreach to peek at the input range without actually
consuming input.
On 3/24/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
But this can't be the source of the problem,
because, if anything, the hash function I substituted (which is the same
as that for char[] and string currently) should be *faster*.
I'll try and make a test-case to get to the bottom of this.
On 3/24/2012 12:40 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If it still fails with the delay, you can probably find out (for whatever
help it might be) what process is holding the file open by adding a pause
right after running test. Then before Press[ing] a key as it suggests,
run SysInternal's Process
What about a Uri class to build/split uri in components?
Reading RFC, there's a regex to split uri:
string url =
http://example.com/path/subpath/?query=valquery2=val#frag;;
enum ctr =
ctRegex!(r^(([^:/?#]+):)?(//([^/?#]*))?([^?#]*)(\?([^#]*))?(#(.*))?);
auto m =
On 24.03.2012 17:18, Timo Westkämper timo.westkam...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to get started with D programming. My target is to write LV2
plugins (http://lv2plug.in/trac/) with it, but it seems there aren't any
ready made bindings.
Do you know of anyone else who would have gone into this
On 3/24/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Running the D test suite, I ran into a very strange problem.
I can reproduce the problem on Win7 x64. It doesn't seem to have
anything to do with DMD. This is my cc.bat:
dmd -c test.obj
link test.obj
test
link test.obj
But it's not
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jklc1h$25l6$1...@digitalmars.com...
Also, looking at the process list when doing a PAUSE shows no new
processes, but it still fails.
No, no, first download this, it's like Task Manager on steriods:
On 3/24/2012 2:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
But it's not Optlink's fault either. Unilink has the same issue:
I did initially suspect Optlink. It's good to know that that is not the problem.
Andrea Fontana nos...@example.com wrote in message
news:ojmxjzkuimgrtpved...@forum.dlang.org...
What about a Uri class to build/split uri in components?
Reading RFC, there's a regex to split uri:
string url =
http://example.com/path/subpath/?query=valquery2=val#frag;;
On 3/24/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/24/2012 2:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
But it's not Optlink's fault either. Unilink has the same issue:
I did initially suspect Optlink. It's good to know that that is not the
problem.
In the meantime if you're just building
On 03/24/2012 05:14 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
[...]
This solution creates unnecessary template bloat for every implicit
conversion, duplicates compiler logic, and I think it does not work
correctly because of other issues. I have refined
On 3/24/2012 2:39 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/24/12, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/24/2012 2:08 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
But it's not Optlink's fault either. Unilink has the same issue:
I did initially suspect Optlink. It's good to know that that is not the
On 3/24/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
It could be a Win7 x64 bug. If you'll give me 20 minutes I'll get a
hold of an x86 Win7 installation and see if I can reproduce the bug
there.
I can't reproduce this on Win7 x86. I've tried numerous times but it
never failed. It
On 3/24/2012 2:55 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/24/12, Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
It could be a Win7 x64 bug. If you'll give me 20 minutes I'll get a
hold of an x86 Win7 installation and see if I can reproduce the bug
there.
I can't reproduce this on Win7 x86. I've
This might be worth looking into. Dmitry?
http://jblewitt.com/blog/?p=462
Andrei
On 3/24/12, Norbert Nemec norb...@nemec-online.de wrote:
Apart from this, it should just be setting up the bindings, pretty much
like any other D project using an existing C library.
Yeah. From what I can tell all you have to do is translate the lv2.h
header to a D file (maybe try HTOD), and
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 23:06:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This might be worth looking into. Dmitry?
http://jblewitt.com/blog/?p=462
Andrei
A difference of that amount is likely expecting something like
regex(Blah) to not have to create a new regex struct each time,
something
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jklomm$2seb$1...@digitalmars.com...
Yea, I agree that's what it sounds like. I tried to post a response, but
I'm just getting this result (and yes, this is with JS enabled):
Asirra validation failed!
Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:yudtvjsuhhimrhqai...@forum.dlang.org...
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 23:06:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This might be worth looking into. Dmitry?
http://jblewitt.com/blog/?p=462
Andrei
A difference of that amount is likely
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 20:20:59 UTC, Xinok wrote:
Third update:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9jx07estd58wh2p
+ Added in-place sorting; Set template argument inPlace to true
+ Fixed CTFE compatibility issues
+ Vastly improved unittest
+ CTFE unittest will no longer stop compilation upon
When would you use in / out parameters instead of ref const
keywords?
Thanks.
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 07:28:08 Dan wrote:
When would you use in / out parameters instead of ref const
keywords?
out sets the variable to its init value, so you don't run into issues with
the behavior of the function changing based on the value of the variable
that you passed in. out is
On 03/23/2012 11:28 PM, Dan wrote:
When would you use in / out parameters instead of ref const keywords?
I am just about finished translating a chapter exactly on that topic.
I've just realized that I have some questions myself. :)
'out' is the equivalent of a reference in C++, with
On Friday, March 23, 2012 23:37:27 Ali Çehreli wrote:
'in' is the same as 'const scope'. const part is easy to understand but
I don't know what 'scope' does. I could not understand what the spec
means with references in the parameter cannot be escaped (e.g. assigned
to a global variable) for
On 03/23/2012 11:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2012 23:37:27 Ali Çehreli wrote:
'in' is the same as 'const scope'. const part is easy to understand but
I don't know what 'scope' does. I could not understand what the spec
means with references in the parameter cannot be
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 00:02:58 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/23/2012 11:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2012 23:37:27 Ali Çehreli wrote:
'in' is the same as 'const scope'. const part is easy to understand
but
I don't know what 'scope' does. I could not understand
Apparently, scope parameters aren't currently checked at all, so they're
_very_ buggy:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6931
- Jonathan M Davis
On 03/23/2012 11:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I believe that scope is used primarily
with delegates however (particularly, since you often _want_ to be
able to
return a slice of an array passed to a function). It guarantees that
the the
delegate's context won't escape the function and
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:23:07 +0100, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 03/23/2012 08:48 AM, simendsjo wrote:
What's the best way to convert char** from string[]?
In C, char** communicates transfer of ownership. Is that what you are
trying to do? Are you going to pass a slice to a C
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:09:18 +0100, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2012 at 15:48:12 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
What's the best way to convert char** from string[]?
This is one way to do it:
import std.algorithm, std.array, std.string, core.stdc.stdio;
void
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:42:08 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/23/12, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
This is one way to do it:
immutable(char)** p = array(map!toStringz(data)).ptr;
This is asked so frequently that I think we could consider
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:41:48 +0100, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:09:18 +0100, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2012 at 15:48:12 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
What's the best way to convert char** from string[]?
This is one way to do
simendsjo:
Oh, I didn't find toStringz, so I turned it into:
It's in std.string.
auto c_strings = strings.map!(toUTFz!(char*)).array().ptr;
That's wrong syntax, that 2.059head doesn't enforce yet, map needs an ending ().
Bye,
bearophile
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 23:19, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but check the isA template. It seems there's something causing a
nested variadic template to fail. This won't work in a template
constraint (it returns false):
But if you change Args... to Args then it
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:13, John nos...@unavailable.com wrote:
Is there any way to refer to a specific function overload?
You can use __traits(getOverloads, aggregate, member) to get all
overloads of member aggregate.member. Where an aggregate is a class, a
struct or a module.
module
Hi:
I found that SCons now supports D, but when I tried to build a
helloworld program, error occurred: undefined reference to
`clock_gettime'.
It seemed that adding -lrt after -lphobos2 would do the job, so I
tried to add this in SConstruct:
env = Environment()
env.Append(LIBS = 'rt')
24.03.2012 14:13, John написал:
Is there any way to refer to a specific function overload?
For example:
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
void foo() {}
void foo(int x) {}
void main() {
writeln(foo.mangleof);
writeln(ParameterTypeTuple!(foo).stringof);
}
Both of these statements
On Saturday, 24 March 2012 at 13:59:30 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
module pack.mod; // needs to be XXX.YYY for __traits to work
void foo() {}
void foo(int x) {}
template Alias(A...) { alias A Alias;}
void main()
{
// The Alias!( ) trick is needed to work around a
limitation in
alias X Y
On 03/24/12 15:39, Mantis wrote:
24.03.2012 14:13, John написал:
Is there any way to refer to a specific function overload?
For example:
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
void foo() {}
void foo(int x) {}
void main() {
writeln(foo.mangleof);
The documentation for std.range states
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_range.html
This module defines the notion of range (by the membership tests isInputRange,
isForwardRange, isBidirectionalRange, isRandomAccessRange), range capability tests (such
as hasLength or hasSlicing), and a few useful
On 03/24/12 18:07, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 03/24/12 15:39, Mantis wrote:
Will not hold for return types other than void, there may be some generic
workaround (of course, you can pass return type as tempate parameter).
Something like
auto getOverload(alias func, A...)(A a) {
On 03/24/2012 11:19 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
The documentation for std.range states
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_range.html
This module defines the notion of range (by the membership tests
isInputRange, isForwardRange, isBidirectionalRange,
isRandomAccessRange), range capability tests (such
On 24.03.2012 22:19, Stewart Gordon wrote:
The documentation for std.range states
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_range.html
This module defines the notion of range (by the membership tests
isInputRange, isForwardRange, isBidirectionalRange,
isRandomAccessRange), range capability tests (such as
On 03/24/2012 09:07 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:07, Artur Skawinaart.08...@gmail.com wrote:
foreach (f; __traits(getOverloads, __traits(parent, main), foo)) {
Hey, this
^^
it's a way to get the current module, right? Nice trick, I didn't
On 24/03/2012 18:57, Ali Çehreli wrote:
snip
Iterating an output range is also by popFront(). So what it says is, put this
element to
the output range and advance the range. There is a gotcha about this when the
output range
is a slice: Whatever is just put into the range is popped right away!
On 03/25/2012 12:07 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 24/03/2012 18:57, Ali Çehreli wrote:
snip
Iterating an output range is also by popFront(). So what it says is,
put this element to
the output range and advance the range. There is a gotcha about this
when the output range
is a slice: Whatever is
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 23:07:01 Stewart Gordon wrote:
Something else I'm finding puzzling is moveFront, moveAt and moveBack. Is
D trying to be C++11 or something? Move semantics don't seem to me to be
useful in a language with GC.
The GC doesn't have anything do with it. If you're
On 03/24/12 23:10, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/24/2012 09:07 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:07, Artur Skawinaart.08...@gmail.com wrote:
foreach (f; __traits(getOverloads, __traits(parent, main), foo)) {
Hey, this
^^
it's a way to get the current
On 03/24/2012 04:07 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 24/03/2012 18:57, Ali Çehreli wrote:
snip
Iterating an output range is also by popFront(). So what it says is,
put this element to
the output range and advance the range. There is a gotcha about this
when the output range
is a slice: Whatever is
On 03/25/2012 12:34 AM, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 03/24/12 23:10, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/24/2012 09:07 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:07, Artur Skawinaart.08...@gmail.com wrote:
foreach (f; __traits(getOverloads, __traits(parent, main), foo)) {
Hey, this
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 18:14:46 Ali Çehreli wrote:
I looked for rationale on Andrei's article. There is this bit about STL
forward iterators:
quote
Input and forward iterators are syntactically identical but subtly
different semantically—copying a forward iterator saves iteration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7751
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, pull
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7754
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7611
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7754
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7722
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-03-24 00:24:18 PDT ---
Reposted same pull:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/830
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7743
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7608
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7731
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, pull
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
