Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
> Unfortunately, my proposal was not picked up this year. I might try to work
> on these ideas this summer anyway so I would still be very much interested
> in ideas and feedback, but I will probably have much less time if I'll be
> working somewhere else.
I'm less familia
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 04:55:34 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
My concern is that the proposal is much complicated and less
useful
for general use cases.
You can emulate such formatting like follows:
IMHO addition of %!+s and %!-s alone and removing %c's magic will
only simplify formatting for
On Sunday, 22 April 2012 at 18:42:19 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan <
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Voldemort types (coined by Andrei Alexandrescu) are types,
which can't
be named. Like so:
auto getMisteriousData(int i)
{
struct Mysterious
Writing portable code is hard enough as it is. Why do we have to have
some random, D-specialized calling convention (only on Win32 and only in
DMD)? The result of the current state of things is that extern(D) is
essentially useless - it has completely different meanings across
compilers. You ca
On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 20:42:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/20/12 2:18 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:39:05 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
"No results". It seems to only search for boards you are
involved in.
No global search.
That's kind of silly. What is t
2012年4月24日17:20 Denis Shelomovskij :
> On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 04:55:34 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
>>
>> My concern is that the proposal is much complicated and less useful
>> for general use cases.
>> You can emulate such formatting like follows:
>
>
> IMHO addition of %!+s and %!-s alone and rem
On 24 April 2012 09:42, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Writing portable code is hard enough as it is. Why do we have to have some
> random, D-specialized calling convention (only on Win32 and only in DMD)?
> The result of the current state of things is that extern(D) is essentially
> useless - it ha
On 24 April 2012 10:08, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 09:42, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>> Writing portable code is hard enough as it is. Why do we have to have some
>> random, D-specialized calling convention (only on Win32 and only in DMD)?
>> The result of the current state of things i
Sure. The whole point of this scheme is to specify the parameters
first, and then choose the method to call. This can lead to cool
results because the subsequent choice of the method can be deferred to
later and/or automated and/or chained with more pre-parametrized
calls. You'll be able to keep as
There are lots of times, when a specialized custom calling convention
is necessary.
For instance, I need a dynamic typing subsystem, to create abstract
state machines, which can be effortlessly adapted to run-time
heterogeneous data.
I already made a function, that takes arbitrary arguments and tig
Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so
there shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it's a
developer's mistake or intention.
On 24-04-2012 11:41, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
There are lots of times, when a specialized custom calling convention
is necessary.
For instance, I need a dynamic typing subsystem, to create abstract
state machines, which can be effortlessly adapted to run-time
heterogeneous data.
I already made a fu
On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it's a developer's
mistake or intention.
The point is just that: Right now I can write assembly
[I had sent Walter an email, answering a question he asked me a
few years ago. Walter asked me to post the message here.
Slightly redacted - I took out an non-relevant aside, and since
the forum doesn't support HTML bold, italic, underscore tags
those have been stripped as well.]
Hi Walter,
My understanding is that Facebook is sponsoring D. At least in some
capacity, I’m not sure of the details or extent. But still, it’s a
start, and important, and Facebook has monetary resources.
Andrei works at facebook, that's all.
Web framework. What do people use Ruby on Rails, or sligh
> we will be programming bacterial cells in the computer and
> compiling and storing its program into these new cells so they can
> readily execute them
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/news/pressreleases/2011/november/easily-re-
programmable-cells-could-be-key-in-creation-of-new-life-forms.aspx
As a follow up to my email to Walter...
I know I didn't address the question "How can D become adopted at
my company?" head-on.
An on-going project written in (say) C++ is not going to get
approval to re-write in D. There is no ROI in it.
A new project that could be written in D will be me
Awesome! Thanks Trass3r!
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 12:04:27 UTC, Eljay wrote:
I have to say, I’m not a fan of JavaScript. I’ve seen the
leading edge of compile-to-JavaScript languages, such as
CoffeeScript and DART. Can D get on that bandwagon and have
the D compiler compile to JavaScript as some sort of IL?
Ye
Hi folks,
Now I'm using Win 7 64 (for work). It don't have MSVC installed, but Win
7 SDK.
I tried to built DMD using it, but failed:
C:\Downloads\Software\DigitalMars\d-git\dmd\src>vcbuild\builddmd.bat
vcbuild\dmc_cl -c -Iroot;vcbuild /Zi -cpp mars -Ae
cl : Command line warning D9026 : options
On 24 April 2012 08:32, Jens Mueller wrote:
> Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
> > Unfortunately, my proposal was not picked up this year. I might try to
> work
> > on these ideas this summer anyway so I would still be very much
> interested
> > in ideas and feedback, but I will probably have much less t
Eljay:
Looking at all the successful languages, I have noticed that
all the successful ones I am familiar with have had some sort
of sponsor pushing the technology.
Python was widely used before Google "support". And I think
Haskell has enjoyed corporate support for a lot of time.
My und
On 24-04-2012 16:05, bearophile wrote:
Eljay:
Looking at all the successful languages, I have noticed that all the
successful ones I am familiar with have had some sort of sponsor
pushing the technology.
Python was widely used before Google "support". And I think Haskell has
enjoyed corporate
interesting, but all in all just ambitious goals. no actual work done yet.
Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
> On 24 April 2012 08:32, Jens Mueller wrote:
>
> > Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, my proposal was not picked up this year. I might try to
> > work
> > > on these ideas this summer anyway so I would still be very much
> > interested
> > > in ideas and feedb
On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
>>
>> Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
>> shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
>> If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it's a developer's
>> mistake or i
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 08:43:18 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
I tried to add myself to the review manager volunteer card. It
seems I have to be member of the org in order to do that. Can
you add me?
I was going to add you, but looks like you are already added
(Andrei must have done it).
Y
On 24-04-2012 16:39, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
If the assembler code is unportable across compilers, it'
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:40:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so
there
shouldn't be any binary incompatibility.
If the assembler code is unportab
As D is more than just C or C++ it may take account for providing it's
own calling convention.
_BUT_ (That's the point, I agree to Alex), it needs to be consistent
across _different compilers for the same plattform_.
Maybe someone can point out the benefits of having a different calling
conventio
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 13:47:30 UTC, Andre Tampubolon wrote:
Any suggestions?
In case he doesn't read your message here anyway, you might want
to ping Rainer Schuetze directly, as he is the one who worked on
VC support.
David
This means that in the end we have the same ABI issues between
D compilers, as in other languages I suppose, right?
--
Paulo
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:40:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
Speaking about GD
On 24 April 2012 17:05, Erik Jensen wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:40:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24-04-2012 11:42, Kagamin wrote:
Speaking about GDC, you can't link to omf files directly - so there
s
On 24-04-2012 19:54, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This means that in the end we have the same ABI issues between
D compilers, as in other languages I suppose, right?
--
Paulo
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:40:05 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 April 2012 11:29, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 24-04-2012
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:05:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Eljay:
Looking at all the successful languages, I have noticed that
all the successful ones I am familiar with have had some sort
of sponsor pushing the technology.
Python was widely used before Google "support". And I think
Haske
On 2012-04-24 14:04, Eljay wrote:
D on iOS. So for me personally, I would love to use D to write my
applications for iOS, and OS X. But… I’m not sure how to do that. (The
Objective-D project looks abandoned, never got out of the “toy” project
stage, and doesn’t bridge Cocoa’s Frameworks written
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Eljay wrote:
> As a follow up to my email to Walter...
>
> I know I didn't address the question "How can D become adopted at my company?"
> head-on.
Your response is actually very typical of most responses to the question.
What's interesting to me is that it's really a def
Am 24.04.2012 21:53, schrieb Brad Roberts:
> Neither Walter (in this case) nor the question asked for re-writting
> anything. In fact, that's frequently stated (again, by Walter and others,
> including myself) as explicitly a non-goal. Rewriting applications to
> another language is an exercis
I believe the following two lines of code should produce the same
output. Is there a specific reason why doesn't allow this? Of course the
only way to store the result would be to put in into a BigInt variable
or convert it to string but I don't that shouldn't prevent the compiler
from producin
Am Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:00:31 +0900
schrieb "Tyro[17]" :
> I believe the following two lines of code should produce the same
> output. Is there a specific reason why doesn't allow this? Of course the
> only way to store the result would be to put in into a BigInt variable
> or convert it to stri
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7983
T
--
Ruby is essentially Perl minus Wall.
Trass3r wrote:
> no actual work done yet.
Wrong. Actual work on the project started more than three month ago and
of course there exists previous research:
http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewPerson.aspx?PersonId=110493
-manfred
Marco Leise:
If you need this functionality use a programming language that
has type classes and seamlessly switches between int/BigInt
types, but drops the systems language attribute.
I think Lisp (that beside allowing you to use fixnums that can't
grow, often is used with tagged integers,
Hello all,
Currently Phobos only implements the uniform distribution for random number
generation. It should be relatively trivial to extend that to other
distributions (exponential, normal, Pareto, ...), so I'm considering putting
together some code.
Before I start writing, though: are the
Today I was playing around with using std.format to read/write data, and
I discovered that while writing %s works for almost anything (via
.toString for user types), reading %s is not extensible.
I tried overloading parse() and unformatValue, but due to the way D
modules are handled, this doesn't
On 4/24/2012 6:43 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 13:47:30 UTC, Andre Tampubolon wrote:
Any suggestions?
In case he doesn't read your message here anyway, you might want to ping
Rainer Schuetze directly, as he is the one who worked on VC support.
David
Unfortunate
46 matches
Mail list logo
