On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 02:37:52 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 at 10:28:29 UTC, bearophile wrote:
SomeDude:
It's a bad solution imho. Monitoring the druntime and hunting
every part that allocates until our codebase is correct like
Benjamen Thaut is a much
Kazuhiro Inaba (Dark Integers Team) has reached position 6 in
the prestigious ICFP 2012, it's not bad:
http://www.kmonos.net/repos/icfpc12/wiki?name=icfpc12
Code:
http://www.kmonos.net/repos/icfpc12/dir?ci=tip
Info on the contest and its results:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TCqUU3-GT0
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 06:09:04 UTC, Alex Rønne
Petersen wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on porting the tool chain to Solaris (or
rather, updating the existing, bitrotten port). It would be
nice if we could add a Solaris machine to the auto tester
infrastructure to make sure the
For C++
$ cat hello.cpp
#include iostream
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout hello;
return 0;
}
$ g++ hello.cpp -o hello
$ ldd hello
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7703000)
libstdc++.so.6 =
For C++
$ cat hello.cpp
#include iostream
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout hello;
return 0;
}
$ g++ hello.cpp -o hello
$ ldd hello
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7703000)
libstdc++.so.6 =
On 9/12/12 10:34 PM, nazriel wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 17:06:36 UTC, Habibutsu wrote:
At now in most distribute of linux contains ldc (LLVM D Compiler) and
not contain dmd. Why?
Arch Linux has got everything,
DMD, LDC, GDC everything up-to-date!
:-) Thanks svenstaro!
I
On 9/13/12 1:02 AM, Manuel wrote:
If a bigger part of the D community would like to have these annotations
added to the language, at least as an optional feature, then that might
persuade our benevolent dictators (just joking - you are great!)
Walther and Andrei to add them or we could just make
On 13-09-2012 12:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/12/12 10:34 PM, nazriel wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 17:06:36 UTC, Habibutsu wrote:
At now in most distribute of linux contains ldc (LLVM D Compiler) and
not contain dmd. Why?
Arch Linux has got everything,
DMD, LDC, GDC
On 13 September 2012 10:25, deeproot deeprootdeepr...@gmail.com wrote:
For C++
$ cat hello.cpp
#include iostream
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout hello;
return 0;
}
$ g++ hello.cpp -o hello
$ ldd hello
In D:
class A { // or struct
A(ref int host) : _host(host) { }
private:
int* _host;
}
Since when do we have initialization lists in D? ;)
at topic: +1
On 2012-09-13 11:26, deeproot wrote:
Now, when i compile with -static flag to gdc then i get following
warnings
$ gdc -static hello.d
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.6/libgphobos2.a(path.o): In
function
`_D3std4path11expandTildeFAyaZAya18expandFromDatabaseFAyaZAya':
(.text+0x335): warning:
On 9/13/12 6:58 AM, Namespace wrote:
In D:
class A { // or struct
A(ref int host) : _host(host) { }
private:
int* _host;
}
Since when do we have initialization lists in D? ;)
Oops, sorry :o).
at topic: +1
One question Walter and I thought about a lot was whether we should
disallow
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 10:34:00 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
The thing is, however, that in this matter reasonable people
may disagree.
Sounds exactly like the C# lambda syntax situation.
On 05/09/12 20:12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-05 14:32, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
angel wrote:
Check out LDC web-page ...
In github we see they're up to date - merging 2.060
What's the status of SEH on Windows?
It's not looking good, at least not for 32bit. Borland has some kind of
I don't think there would be problems with allowing ref/out
optionally at the call site. The thing is, however, that in
this matter reasonable people may disagree.
I'd be unable to identify any pattern in engineers choosing one
preference over the other.
Maybe C++ fans prefer pointers or
On 9/13/12 10:53 AM, David Piepgrass wrote:
Walter and I have discussed this for quite a while. We have recently
decided to disallow, at least in SafeD, escaping the address of a ref
parameter. In the beginning we'll be overly conservative by
disallowing taking the address of a ref altogether.
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:34:34 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't think there would be problems with allowing ref/out optionally
at the call site. The thing is, however, that in this matter reasonable
people may disagree.
I really think that optionally allowing ref and out at the
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 15:01:28 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/13/12 10:53 AM, David Piepgrass wrote:
Walter and I have discussed this for quite a while. We have
recently
decided to disallow, at least in SafeD, escaping the address
of a ref
parameter. In the beginning we'll
I really think that optionally allowing ref and out at the call
site is more
damaging than beneficial. _Requiring_ it could be beneficial,
since then you
know that the arguments are being taken by ref, but if it's
optional, it gives
you a false sense of security and can be misleading.
It
On 9/13/12 11:47 AM, David Piepgrass wrote:
I really think that optionally allowing ref and out at the call site
is more
damaging than beneficial. _Requiring_ it could be beneficial, since
then you
know that the arguments are being taken by ref, but if it's optional,
it gives
you a false sense
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 16:29:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
It gives *who* a false sense of security?
It's whom.
Andrei
P.S. All of my life I've been waiting for this moment!!!
LOL
On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
One question Walter and I thought about a lot was whether we should disallow
escaping addresses of ref parameters in general or only in @safe code. We
decided to go for the latter in order to avoid
dmd2-git is in AUR too, not in main repo.
On 2012-09-13 16:40, Don Clugston wrote:
That sounds paranoid to me. I believe the patent is essentially a
workaround for the absence of thread-local variables on 16-bit Windows.
Yeah, I know.
In D we have working thread-local variables even on Windows versions
that don't support them,
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-09-13 16:40, Don Clugston wrote:
In D we have working thread-local variables even on Windows versions
that don't support them, thanks to Rainer's brilliant work. Which gives
very many ways of implementing exception
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 17:47:45 David Piepgrass wrote:
It gives *who* a false sense of security? If it's optional then I
*know* lack of ref/out doesn't imply that the parameter won't
change. Only people who don't know the rules would have this
false sense of security.
More like
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 15:18:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:34:34 Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I don't think there would be problems with allowing ref/out
optionally
at the call site. The thing is, however, that in this matter
reasonable
people may
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 17:24:57 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
[SNIP]
I did some tests and implementations, and I came with 3 options:
1) Embrace the view of a chain implementation and document it.
2) Use classic reference semantics. However, ranges can still
have an out of bonds view
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 19:37:41 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 17:24:57 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
[SNIP]
[SNIP]
I'll just copy paste here the 3 headers which contain examples,
to give a quicker idea of what I went for:
111 CHAIN IMPLEMENTATION 111
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 10:34:00 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/13/12 1:02 AM, Manuel wrote:
If a bigger part of the D community would like to have these
annotations
added to the language, at least as an optional feature, then
that might
persuade our benevolent dictators (just
Couldn't this easily be supported by an IDE by coloured function
arguments based on their type? Then the information is clearly
visible without cluttering the code.
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 22:36:23 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I just started using your fork of scons and I appreciate the
effort.
There are a few issues I will report.
https://bitbucket.org/russel/scons_d_tooling/issues
This repository does not have issue tracking enabled.
Is there another
I just started using your fork of scons and I appreciate the
effort.
There are a few issues I will report.
I definitely would like to see scons build and link both c/c++
objects files together with D, so for that reason alone
integration is a good idea imo.
Integration is also a good idea for
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 at 14:42:25 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
It appears that the LDC website is in need of an overhaul.
No kidding. I thought the project was completely dead. Updating a
web page is usually very easy, strange ...
-rt
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 00:39 +0200, Rob T wrote:
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 22:36:23 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I just started using your fork of scons and I appreciate the
effort.
There are a few issues I will report.
https://bitbucket.org/russel/scons_d_tooling/issues
This repository
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 00:52 +0200, Rob T wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 at 14:42:25 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
It appears that the LDC website is in need of an overhaul.
No kidding. I thought the project was completely dead. Updating a
web page is usually very easy, strange ...
Hi,
I'd like to write a function for a vector template which
basically looks like
struct Vec(T, size_t size) {
T[size] e;
}
This template has a few properties with very common names like x,
y, z, etc. To avoid mistakes I'd like to write a template
constraint for UFCS functions so it
Am 13.09.2012 11:46, schrieb Rene Zwanenburg:
Hi,
I'd like to write a function for a vector template which basically looks
like
struct Vec(T, size_t size) {
T[size] e;
}
This template has a few properties with very common names like x, y, z,
etc. To avoid mistakes I'd like to write a
That works, nice trick!
Thanks
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 10:09:08 UTC, David wrote:
Am 13.09.2012 11:46, schrieb Rene Zwanenburg:
Hi,
I'd like to write a function for a vector template which
basically looks
like
struct Vec(T, size_t size) {
T[size] e;
}
This template has a few
Rene Zwanenburg:
How can I do this?
One possible solution:
struct Vec(T, size_t size) {
T[size] e;
}
void innerProduct(T, size_t n)(const Vec!(T, n) v1,
const Vec!(T, n) v2) {}
void main() {
Vec!(int, 3) v1, v2;
innerProduct(v1, v2);
}
(While
That's actually quite straightforward. I forgot how well D's type
deduction works.
Thanks
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 at 11:01:18 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Rene Zwanenburg:
How can I do this?
One possible solution:
struct Vec(T, size_t size) {
T[size] e;
}
void innerProduct(T,
I know this is really old, but just catching up on old posts.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:19:34 -0400, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
tl;dr - Please see the conclusion section below.
[snip]
CONCLUSION:
* For parameters of reference types that are not modified in the
function, const is
I decided to put some code here that allowed me read (via a
streamed pipe) the stdout from an external process. I didn't see
something like this before and when searching I only found the
new std.process in phobos development branch which doesn't have a
Windows version.
If anyone feels like
As part of a larger system (which converts function parameters to
a suitable type), I need to solve the following: pass a member
function to a run template function, access its
ParameterTypeTuple, and actually be able to run the function.
I've simplified the problem (see below). Is there a way
timotheecour:
//attempt#2
//also tried to just pass x=a.fun2(x), but then
ParameterTypeTuple doesn't work with lambdas.
I think x = a.fun2(x) isn't an anonymous function, it's
templated.
Bye,
bearophile
On 9/14/12, timotheecour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I can't pass a.fun2 as fun2 is not static.
Why not pass it as a runtime argument?
void run(Fun, T...)(Fun fun, T args)
{
writeln(typeid(ParameterTypeTuple!(fun)));
fun(args);
}
void test()
{
auto a = new A;
On Friday, 14 September 2012 at 00:31:15 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/14/12, timotheecour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote:
It has issues when the class is defined in a different modules,
but not always!
This looks like a compiler bug. Feel free to file it in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
I filed 2 bugs:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8653 cannot take
address of auto-return function declared in outside module:
Error: forward reference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8654 cannot take
address of function which is 1)overloaded, 2) templated, and 3)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8647
Summary: Invalid specification of destroy function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8647
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8648
Summary: No error line number with incomplete template
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8649
Summary: Not accepted const ref Type in foreach
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: minor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8649
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-13 04:29:38 PDT ---
This is a dup of issue 4090.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8649
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-09-13 04:55:51 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a dup of issue 4090.
At first sight it doesn't look like the same issue, because here I am listing
all the types and modifiers. const ref
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8627
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8627
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4414
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blo...@hotmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8650
Summary: SLice opOpAssign SLice with overlap does not throw
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8651
Summary: Slice op Slice throws exceptions (not errors), and
nothrow
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8652
Summary: dmd make calls to _d_assertm
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8653
Summary: cannot take address of auto-return function declared
in outside module: Error: forward reference
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8654
Summary: cannot take address of function which is 1)overloaded,
2) templated, and 3) member (static or not): Error:
xxx is not an lvalue
Product: D
Version: D2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8415
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-09-13
20:17:20 PDT ---
Anyone know if this is a hard to fix bug?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8655
Summary: bitfields and Typedef don't mix
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8422
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-13 22:13:42 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8422
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
66 matches
Mail list logo
