So are there any significant objections to Kenji's PR?
I think it's got a lot of things going for it, particularly in
finishing the job begun by DIP#7 and opDollar. I realize it's not
likely be a top priority for most people, but it's got a lot of
bang for your buck: a great benefit to an
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:46:23 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 13:35:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I proposed this inside the long major performance problem with
std.array.front, I've also proposed it before, a long time ago.
But
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:05 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 2:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What in my proposal makes you think you don't have unfettered access?
The
underlying immutable(char)[] representation is accessible. In fact, you
would
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 18:56:41 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 10.03.2014 15:11, schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:08:07 UTC, Mike wrote:
Thank you, to everone who worked on this. It's quite an
improvement.
Problem:
On 3/10/2014 11:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/10/14, 7:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I still don't like disqus :)
Are there better such systems available?
Yea, forum.dlang.org ;) And anything else that doesn't completely and
totally break without JS.
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 18:56:41 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
It's actually already there - at the top of each page, there is
a View source code button that goes to the proper file/line
and to the proper branch/tag. I've used the same style as the
already existing buttons, but those are indeed
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 22:28:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/10/2014 11:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/10/14, 7:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I still don't like disqus :)
Are there better such systems available?
Yea, forum.dlang.org ;) And anything else that doesn't
completely
On 3/10/14, 3:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/10/2014 11:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/10/14, 7:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I still don't like disqus :)
Are there better such systems available?
Yea, forum.dlang.org ;) And anything else that doesn't completely and
totally break
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 22:56:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/10/14, 3:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/10/2014 11:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/10/14, 7:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I still don't like disqus :)
Are there better such systems available?
Yea,
A key required (imho) feature, the ability to edit after the fact. The primary value that I see in
any sort of embedded user input feature is the the most streamlined way of adding essentially bug
reports about the page directly on the page. Those reports should be acted upon and the page
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:42:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Yes. I have given up about this idea at some point as there
seemed to be consensus that no breaking changes will be even
considered for D2 and those that come from fixing bugs are not
worth the fuss.
So at what point are we going to
On 3/10/14, 4:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
It's still on my list... sorry it's taking this long. You're the only
one who requested this feature, though. I can think of several
improvements (some of which are in the pipeline) which I think would be
more useful to the community overall, but if
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 23:16:40 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
A key required (imho) feature, the ability to edit after the
fact. The primary value that I see in any sort of embedded
user input feature is the the most streamlined way of adding
essentially bug reports about the page directly on
On 3/10/2014 3:26 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:05 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
This also makes it a non-starter.
You're the guardian of changes to the language, clearly holding a veto on any
proposals. But this doesn't come across as very
On 3/10/2014 6:47 AM, Dicebot wrote:
(array literals that allocate, I will never forgive that).
It was done that way simply to get it up and running quickly. Having them not
allocate is an optimization, it doesn't change the nature.
Walter Bright:
In the last couple days, we also wound up annoying a valuable
client with some minor breakage with std.json, reiterating how
important it is to not break code if we can at all avoid it..
There are still some breaking changed that I'd like to perform in
D, like deprecating
On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 00:02:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
In the last couple days, we also wound up annoying a valuable
client with some minor breakage with std.json, reiterating how
important it is to not break code if we can at all avoid it..
There are still some
On 3/10/2014 7:35 PM, Yota wrote:
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:42:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Yes. I have given up about this idea at some point as there seemed to
be consensus that no breaking changes will be even considered for D2
and those that come from fixing bugs are not worth the fuss.
So
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:59:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 6:47 AM, Dicebot wrote:
(array literals that allocate, I will never forgive that).
It was done that way simply to get it up and running quickly. Having
them not allocate is an optimization,
On 3/10/14, 7:07 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:59:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 6:47 AM, Dicebot wrote:
(array literals that allocate, I will never forgive that).
It was done that way simply to get it up and running quickly.
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:56:22 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/10/14, 7:07 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:59:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 6:47 AM, Dicebot wrote:
(array literals that
On 3/10/14, 8:05 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think you are missing what I'm saying, I don't want the allocation
eliminated, but if we eliminate some allocations with [] and not others,
it will be confusing. The path I'd always hoped we would go in was to
make all array literals immutable,
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 11:21:19 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
This fails to compile
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e9a90e808af4
It's a compiler bug.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12334
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3371
Kenji Hara
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 14:09:28 UTC, Tolga Cakiroglu wrote:
For this, you create an Interface that matches to the method
declaration of your class. But notice that instead of defining
methods, you will define attributes those types' match to that
class's methods. I did this before and
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 06:38:35 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 14:09:28 UTC, Tolga Cakiroglu wrote:
For this, you create an Interface that matches to the method
declaration of your class. But notice that instead of defining
methods, you will define attributes those
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 12:07:22 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
Now suppose that my D shared library contains a class, rather
that just module ctors/dtors, how do I go about creating an
instance of that class and using its methods?
After wandering down several dead-end paths, and help from other
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 10:46:26 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
assert(!find!(toLower(a) == b)(s, hello).empty);
assert(!find!(toLower(a) == b)(clist.name,
name2).empty);
But clist is an array of c's, it has no `.name` field by
itself. So, put
the `.name` call inside the
Hi,
Does anyone have an example of linking against libmilter? The milter
applications I have seen are a little overweight for my taste, I just
want to check email headers.
I sure would like to take advante of the fast regexp of D rather than
buildin my own solution in C (which I don't
I'm toying with the dproto library and have encountered an issue
where I can't remove items from a repeated list of items. I'd
like to see what the mixins are producing in terms of actual D
code, so that I can figure out how I can correctly try to delete
an entry or find the code that's
Change the mixin(x) line to pragma(msg, x);. It will then print
out the generated string at compile time instead of mixing it in
so you can take a look at it.
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 18:25:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Change the mixin(x) line to pragma(msg, x);. It will then print
out the generated string at compile time instead of mixing it
in so you can take a look at it.
That just gives me an error:
source/app.d(29): Error: Cannot interpret
Is it, in D today, possible to explicitly tag higher order ranges
such as for example `map` with their pureness, safeness and
throwness based on the corresponding properties on their function
arguments such as `fun...`?
And is this motivated? now that the D compiler deduce these
properties
On Monday, March 10, 2014 22:02:39 Nordlöw wrote:
Is it, in D today, possible to explicitly tag higher order ranges
such as for example `map` with their pureness, safeness and
throwness based on the corresponding properties on their function
arguments such as `fun...`?
And is this
I'm not quite sure what you're asking. You either mark a
function as @safe,
pure, and/or nothrow - or you don't, in which case, if it's a
templated
function, the attributes are inferred to the best of the
compiler's
capabilities, and if it's not, then the function doesn't have
those
Hi.
I was editing std.string,but when I tried to compile it it game
me this error:
string.d(368): Error: template std.string.indexOf cannot deduce
function from argument types !()(string, dchar), candidates are:
string.d(306):std.string.indexOf(S)(S s, ElementType!S c,
CaseSensitive cs =
Is there a way to do the following lazily:
writelnIfNotEmpty(T)(T a){
auto b=text(a);
if(b.length)
writeln(b);
}
ie, without using std.conv.text (which needlessly computes an intermediate
string, which could be quite large) or launching a separate process ?
writelnIfNotEmpty(); //doesn't
On 3/10/2014 9:24 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Is there a way to do the following lazily:
writelnIfNotEmpty(T)(T a){
auto b=text(a);
if(b.length)
writeln(b);
}
ie, without using std.conv.text (which needlessly computes an intermediate
string, which could be quite large) or launching a separate
On Monday, March 10, 2014 21:50:25 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/10/2014 9:24 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Is there a way to do the following lazily:
writelnIfNotEmpty(T)(T a){
auto b=text(a);
if(b.length)
writeln(b);
}
ie, without using std.conv.text (which needlessly
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Monday, March 10, 2014 21:50:25 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/10/2014 9:24 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Is there a way to do the following lazily:
writelnIfNotEmpty(T)(T a){
auto b=text(a);
if(b.length)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12287
--- Comment #18 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-09 23:01:19 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@gnuk.net
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12287
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12334
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12315
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12335
Summary: std.algorithm.skipOver should support multiple args
like startsWith
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4085
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-10 01:22:14 PDT ---
This suggests the introduction of a static foreach, so the current ER is not
needed:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP57
So I think the static foreach part of this proposal could
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #44 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2014-03-10
02:26:47 PDT ---
Partial fix:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3372
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-10 05:10:00 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12148
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12148
Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2278
MCD s_la...@ira.uni-karlsruhe.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12332
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-10 08:23:35 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12336
Summary: skipOver should accept variadics just like startsWith
does
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1553
--- Comment #17 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-10 09:06:35 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Summary: Bad enum usage wrong error message line number
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12338
w0rp devw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devw...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12338
Summary: @trusted delegates should implicitly cast to @safe
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12339
Summary: alais this not considered for qualified conversion
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12339
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12340
Summary: /DELEXECUTABLE does not work
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12339
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-10 13:26:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think it does not work because struct contains pointer. If you comment out
it, it will work.
Note that dispite you alias to S type, S itself
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12340
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12340
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-03-10
13:47:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Crash? That doesn't look like a crash.
Well it's a dialog box, isn't it? And it's completely uninformative to what the
real
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12341
Summary: Add EXTRA_C_SOURCES to autotester
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2659
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12342
Summary: Deprecate not reachable code?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12343
Summary: Win64 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs as
function parameters
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #45 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2014-03-10
16:30:15 PDT ---
Similar issue for Win64: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12343
--
Configure issuemail:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #46 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-10 17:01:14 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12342
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6549
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12344
Summary: .di generation doesn't include contracts in interfaces
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6549
--- Comment #8 from Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com 2014-03-10
20:46:56 PDT ---
well I guess we *can* have interfaces now, but not abstract classes... random
limitation indeed.
--
Configure issuemail:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12342
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
101 - 177 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
