On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 03:30:14 UTC, sdvcn wrote:
On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 03:17:46 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,everyone,
Many Chinese coders found under Chinese characters were not
display correctly under CodePage 936,but if use the Function
CharToOemW,it's ok.
import std.c.stdio;
im
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 02:20:46 UTC, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
Hi all,
After last year's incident with my tires getting slashed, I'm
really hoping I can do without a car during this year's DConf.
How feasible is this?
I'll be staying at Aloft. Would be great if there's someone I
can share a
On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 03:17:46 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,everyone,
Many Chinese coders found under Chinese characters were not
display correctly under CodePage 936,but if use the Function
CharToOemW,it's ok.
import std.c.stdio;
import std.c.windows.windows;
import std.stdio;
extern (W
Hi,everyone,
Many Chinese coders found under Chinese characters were not
display correctly under CodePage 936,but if use the Function
CharToOemW,it's ok.
import std.c.stdio;
import std.c.windows.windows;
import std.stdio;
extern (Windows) {
export BOOL CharToOemW(
LPCWSTR lp
On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 01:53:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 20:42:34 -0400, Phil Lavoie
wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 23:14:13 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
How about if instead these constraint could be used in `is`
expressions like type specializations?
vo
On Fri, 16 May 2014 20:42:34 -0400, Phil Lavoie
wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 23:14:13 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
How about if instead these constraint could be used in `is` expressions
like type specializations?
void myTemplateFunction(T)(T r) if(is(T : InputRange!int)) {
for
On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 00:42:35 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 23:14:13 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 20:31:40 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
The main problem is that `myTemplateFunction`'s signature
makes it look like it's a concrete function, when in fact it
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 23:14:13 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 20:31:40 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
The idea is to eventually be able to do something like this:
constraint InputRange(Elt) {
Elt front();
void popFront();
bool empty();
}
void myTemplateFunction( InputRange!int
import std.stdio;
import std.utf;
import std.uni;
import std.string;
import std.random;
import std.conv;
int main(string[] argv)
{
size_t[string] bary;
try{
for(size_t i=0;i<(size_t.max -1);i++)
{
bary["Key:" ~ to!(string
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 20:31:40 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
The idea is to eventually be able to do something like this:
constraint InputRange(Elt) {
Elt front();
void popFront();
bool empty();
}
void myTemplateFunction( InputRange!int r ) {
foreach( elt; r ) { ... }
}
What do you think
On 5/16/2014 1:18 PM, Dicebot wrote:
Also I believe `scope` is one of concepts that are hard to define but incredibly
easy to grasp intuitively.
How and where to put the annotations, and the notion of transitivity, are not so
incredibly easy to grasp. The mix of ref and scope is also a bit of
Hi, I'd like to share an idea I had. It was motivated by the
feeling I get when writing template functions and templates
altogether. The current template constraint mechanism is awesome
cuz it gives power and flexibility. However, I think it could be
improved, readibilty wise. Here is my sugges
On 5/16/2014 3:26 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
No software is feature-complete until it can read email. :-)
Heh :)
Today I skimmed over the PDF spec... and was horrified to discover that
I had been living in a fool's paradise, thinking that it was only a
passive *document* format
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 15:54:44 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
As I understand it, you take a substantial performance hit for
doing so.
I haven't noticed this much. It is a bit more annoying to debug
on IE. I doubt you get much more than a 40% penalty, but you also
get working closures, this-pointer et
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 18:57:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/16/2014 10:33 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 17:22:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/16/2014 9:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Transitive
borrowing solves certain class of issues that currently rely
on convention,
enabling
Am 16.05.2014 21:53, schrieb Joakim:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:15:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
Mind you, how many of the big "be all end all"-technologies that have
been hyped over the years are really good (including community base
projects)? JS, Java, Ajax, PHP, Ruby, iOS, Android ...? With good I
On 5/16/2014 3:15 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/16/14, 11:52 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But then using it as a GUI engine and software platform is like abusing
Latex or PDF to make software run inside Acrobat Viewer. All the effort,
bloat and compromises...and for what point?
I assume that que
define your own HTML5 elements with behaviour. You will
probably see UI kits for that within 1-2 years. (IE9 is holding
back development).
Stuff like this... https://angulardart.org/demo/
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 19:54:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
All of that is just as easily solvable without a web browser
and HTML/CSS/JS. The browser and HTML/etc are completely
incidental to the way those were solved.
We could've had all that by now if so much effort hadn't been
wasted on
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:15:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
Mind you, how many of the big "be all end all"-technologies
that have been hyped over the years are really good (including
community base projects)? JS, Java, Ajax, PHP, Ruby, iOS,
Android ...? With good I mean really good, not omnipresent.
On 5/16/2014 3:26 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 18:55:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't see many webapp areas than cannot run as proper software ;)
Hehe :) Well, it is a question of cost and control.
You cut:
- development costs
Ha ha hah ha. No. God no.
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 19:28:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Today I skimmed over the PDF spec... and was horrified to
discover that
I had been living in a fool's paradise, thinking that it was
only a
passive *document* format. Turns out that it is yet another of
those
document f
On 5/16/2014 8:57 AM, Chris wrote:
Isn't it sad that we still don't have a standard we can rely on, a good
one? Web development is really turning me off. JS, HTML/CSS is a
compatibility hell. I have to use it, there's now way out, and I spend
more time trying to fix things and finding work aroun
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:15:40PM -0700, David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 5/16/14, 11:52 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >But then using it as a GUI engine and software platform is like
> >abusing Latex or PDF to make software run inside Acrobat Viewer. All
> >the effort, bloat and comprom
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 5/16/2014 10:33 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> >On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 17:22:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>On 5/16/2014 9:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> >>>Transitive borrowing solves certain class of issues that currently
>
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 18:55:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't see many webapp areas than cannot run as proper
software ;)
Hehe :) Well, it is a question of cost and control.
You cut:
- development costs
- installation costs
- upgrade costs
You win:
- no more piracy
- full control o
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:52:43PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 5/16/2014 2:21 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> >
> >The ideas behind the browser are great, when looked from the Xerox
> >PARC hypermedia research, the implementation however leaves a lot to
> >be desired.
> >
> >The
On 5/16/14, 11:52 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But then using it as a GUI engine and software platform is like abusing
Latex or PDF to make software run inside Acrobat Viewer. All the effort,
bloat and compromises...and for what point?
I assume that question is mostly rhetorical, because of cours
Am 16.05.2014 20:55, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
On 5/16/2014 6:36 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
I use few native apps these days... I dont really see many application
areas that cannot run as PNaCl+Dart.
I don't see many webapp areas than cannot run as proper software ;)
+1 :)
On 5/16/2014 10:33 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 17:22:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/16/2014 9:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Transitive
borrowing solves certain class of issues that currently rely on convention,
enabling whole new type of verified safe code (both memory safe and conc
On 5/16/2014 6:36 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
I use few native apps these days... I dont really see many application
areas that cannot run as PNaCl+Dart.
I don't see many webapp areas than cannot run as proper software ;)
On 5/16/2014 2:21 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
The ideas behind the browser are great, when looked from the Xerox PARC
hypermedia research, the implementation however leaves a lot to be desired.
The problem is that currently it is a document format, trying to be an
application, with a clustf of J
On 5/16/2014 10:41 AM, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:20:36 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I'll have to go with: If it managed to serve corporate interest,
that's because you were satisfied by it and suggested to others to
"vote with their money".
... or because nobody ever had a real choice
On 5/16/2014 9:21 AM, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 9:12 AM, Chris wrote:
I don't trust product / company centric software. It will lock you in or
lock you out.
Google doesn't have a reputation of creating company centric software.
SPDY was adopted by other browsers as well. If steam picks up
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 16:50:37 UTC, Yota wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 18:05:44 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
...
I just had a crazy idea. "hijackable" keyword (yeah... another
keyword):
Given a function:
"Ret foo(T input, Args... args) @hijackable"
Then, when the compiler sees:
"foo(in
On 5/16/14, 4:53 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/16/2014 01:00 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/15/2014 2:41 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/15/2014 11:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/15/2014 9:07 AM, Timon
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 17:22:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/16/2014 9:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Transitive
borrowing solves certain class of issues that currently rely
on convention,
enabling whole new type of verified safe code (both memory
safe and concurrency
safe). Head-only? Doesn't lo
On 5/16/2014 9:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Transitive
borrowing solves certain class of issues that currently rely on convention,
enabling whole new type of verified safe code (both memory safe and concurrency
safe). Head-only? Doesn't look so.
I'm concerned that transitive borrowing will *preclude*
On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:31:07 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The account https://twitter.com/dlang_org looks like D-related, but the
posts are mostly unrelated to the language. Does anyone know the owner
of the account?
Don't know who it is, but I think you or Walter would be in your r
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 16:31:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The account https://twitter.com/dlang_org looks like D-related,
but the posts are mostly unrelated to the language. Does anyone
know the owner of the account?
Andrei
It's just a spambot, probably follows everyone it can in ho
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:20:33PM +, Chris via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> Yep. Look at the open source communities, all the forks and fights.
> There used to be Tango vs Phobos. On the other hand, it's good that
> people can just do their own thing, if they're not happy with an
> existing pr
On 14.05.2014 12:56, "Marc Schütz" " wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 19:50:52 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
class C { C next; }
shared(C) list;
C newC()
{
return new C; // allocated on the local heap?
Yes, because it doesn't say "new shared(C)".
}
void prependToList(C c)
{
synch
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 18:05:44 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
...
I just had a crazy idea. "hijackable" keyword (yeah... another
keyword):
Given a function:
"Ret foo(T input, Args... args) @hijackable"
Then, when the compiler sees:
"foo(input, args);"
It will always forward directly to T.fo
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 17:08:58 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 12:16:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:05:08 -0400, monarch_dodra
wrote:
"move" will also delegate to "proxyMove".
This is the correct solution IMO. The principle of least
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 18:08:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
get() is returning a pointer to its internally managed data (in
the form of []). You're right that transitivity of borrowing
would support this safely, but I am not proposing that for ref.
To make slicing Buffer safe, one would have
The account https://twitter.com/dlang_org looks like D-related, but the
posts are mostly unrelated to the language. Does anyone know the owner
of the account?
Andrei
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:03:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Dart compiles to JS, but drops support for IE9 after this
summer… so it isn't a mono culture, but you do depend on Google
strategic planning by using Dart.
As I understand it, you take a substantial performance hit for
doing
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 13:10:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
If compiler lacks contextual knowledge, than only means that
range is not actually semantically equivalent to a loop.
Not really. Here is a simple example, a sawtooth generator that
goes from 1 to 0 with a cycle length >=2 (nyquist).
i
monarch_dodra:
That's also why I've stopped using "writeln()" as UFCS: It
"looks" convenient at first, but then you want to turn those
"writeln" into "writefln", and that's when things don't go
according to plan...
Yes, I understand.
If you want some ugly code you can use
std.functional.bi
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 08:43:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
monarch_dodra:
UFCS iota :puke:
I think UFCS iota is acceptable when it has only one argument:
myArray.length.iota...
Bye,
bearophile
My gripe is how "incompatible" 1-arg and 2-arg iota is w.r.t.
UFCS:
0.iota(4);
4.iota();
That
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 15:02:42 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 10:57 AM, Chris wrote:
And companies are run by humans, if I'm not completely
mistaken. It's
not the army that kills people, it's the humans in the army
that kill
other humans. Stoutly reasoned!
Hatred for humans because t
On 2014-05-16 10:57 AM, Chris wrote:
And companies are run by humans, if I'm not completely mistaken. It's
not the army that kills people, it's the humans in the army that kill
other humans. Stoutly reasoned!
Hatred for humans because they serve other humans under a banner is
just plain ignora
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:46:43 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 10:41 AM, Chris wrote:
Isn't it sometimes just choosing the lesser evil instead of
being able
to choose something really good?
Alright, so you can try and make something really good and see
if it can satisfy 95% of the worl
On 2014-05-16 10:41 AM, Chris wrote:
Isn't it sometimes just choosing the lesser evil instead of being able
to choose something really good?
Alright, so you can try and make something really good and see if it can
satisfy 95% of the world's offices as much. Even with infinite funds and
teamma
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:20:36 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 10:15 AM, Chris wrote:
C isn't the best programming language. Only because something
is
everywhere, doesn't mean it's good (Windows comes to mind, and
other big
brands). As to the revolutionary ideas, are they really
revoluti
On 2014-05-16 10:15 AM, Chris wrote:
C isn't the best programming language. Only because something is
everywhere, doesn't mean it's good (Windows comes to mind, and other big
brands). As to the revolutionary ideas, are they really revolutionary or
do they serve some corporate interest? Are there
On 16/05/14 10:32, monarch_dodra wrote:
UFCS iota :puke:
Yeah, it would make more sense if it would be called "upto":
1.upto(4)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 13:52:37 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 9:45 AM, Chris wrote:
You're kidding, aren't you. How can anything developed by a
company
become a real standard, catering for what developers need? The
thread
about Go not featuring generics is a good example. Look at
what h
On 2014-05-16 9:45 AM, Chris wrote:
You're kidding, aren't you. How can anything developed by a company
become a real standard, catering for what developers need? The thread
about Go not featuring generics is a good example. Look at what happened
to Java. Market shares, strategic thinking, these
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 13:21:22 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-16 9:12 AM, Chris wrote:
I don't trust product / company centric software. It will lock
you in or
lock you out.
Google doesn't have a reputation of creating company centric
software. SPDY was adopted by other browsers as wel
On Thu, 15 May 2014 18:30:55 -0400, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 15:09:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But in this case, you have ignored the rules, […]
Which rules exactly? My point is mainly that this area of the language
is underspecified.
The rules that we
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 12:55:30 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
Even if I _were_ a Chrome user, I'd have precisely zero
interest in a browser monoculture. To wit, [P]NaCl and Dart
effectively don't exist in my world.
Dart compiles to JS, but drops support for IE9 after this summer…
so it isn't a mono c
On 2014-05-16 9:52 AM, Etienne wrote:
> SPDY is part of the HTML2 draft
My bad I meant HTTP 2 ;)
On 2014-05-16 9:36 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
16-May-2014 17:21, Etienne пишет:
On 2014-05-16 9:12 AM, Chris wrote:
I don't trust product / company centric software. It will lock you in or
lock you out.
Google doesn't have a reputation of creating company centric software.
SPDY was adopted
16-May-2014 17:21, Etienne пишет:
On 2014-05-16 9:12 AM, Chris wrote:
I don't trust product / company centric software. It will lock you in or
lock you out.
Google doesn't have a reputation of creating company centric software.
SPDY was adopted by other browsers as well. If steam picks up on
On 2014-05-16 2:14 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Only if you are speaking about V8, as the other VMs (Nashorn, Webkit,
Gecko) do use bytecodes, multiple levels actually.
--
Paulo
Well it does need to be converted to bytecode at some point but my point
is that there can be changes in the code's typi
On 2014-05-16 9:12 AM, Chris wrote:
I don't trust product / company centric software. It will lock you in or
lock you out.
Google doesn't have a reputation of creating company centric software.
SPDY was adopted by other browsers as well. If steam picks up on Dart,
it could very well be adopt
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 12:55:30 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 20:34:31 UTC, Etienne wrote:
My position has changed, and I now think D would be in a
better position if it ran in the Dart VM.
Even if I _were_ a Chrome user, I'd have precisely zero
interest in a browser mono
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 11:38:14 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 10:36:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 06:21:40 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
The problem is that currently it is a document format, trying
to be an application, with a clustf of
Java
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 20:34:31 UTC, Etienne wrote:
My position has changed, and I now think D would be in a better
position if it ran in the Dart VM.
Even if I _were_ a Chrome user, I'd have precisely zero interest
in a browser monoculture. To wit, [P]NaCl and Dart effectively
don't
On 05/16/2014 01:56 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/15/2014 4:00 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What if the language allowed the user to supply a proof of purity, which
can be mechanically checked?
I think those sorts of things are PhD research topics.
Well, feasibility has long ago b
On 05/16/2014 01:00 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/15/2014 2:41 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/15/2014 11:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/15/2014 9:07 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Why? A memoizable function
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 10:36:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 06:21:40 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
The problem is that currently it is a document format, trying
to be an application, with a clustf of JavaScript/CSS/HTML
with more compatibility issues than when C w
Yuriy:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f44762a17fe4
As workaround for a D design bug I suggest to write code like
this:
foreach (immutable c; 0 .. 100_000)
Instead of:
foreach(c; 0..10)
Because unfortunately by default that c index is not immutable,
and this causes significant troubles if you m
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 06:21:40 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
The problem is that currently it is a document format, trying
to be an application, with a clustf of JavaScript/CSS/HTML
with more compatibility issues than when C was being
standardized.
I think it is pretty good if you remove IE
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 12:56:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 12:44:56 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 20:02:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
However, you could have rules for collection and FFI (calling
C). Like only allowing collection
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 19:08:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
You are good. Before this is ready for Walter's judgement I
think this needs some simple performance/memory benchmarks, to
compare the situation before and after this change.
I've made some minor optimizations, and rebased everything o
Walter Bright:
Yes, the VRP has been a nice win for D.
There are ways to improve it in very useful ways, that increase
static safety and cut down the number of useless casts required.
Some currently refused examples:
---
int[100] array;
void main() {
foreach (immutable idx
On 5/16/2014 1:54 AM, Araq wrote:
Yes, the VRP has been a nice win for D. No other language does it.
I don't know why you keep saying things like that, you don't know all the
languages out there. Nimrod does it too fwiw...
I having trouble finding it in the spec:
http://nimrod-lang.org/
Yes, the VRP has been a nice win for D. No other language does
it.
I don't know why you keep saying things like that, you don't know
all the languages out there. Nimrod does it too fwiw...
monarch_dodra:
UFCS iota :puke:
I think UFCS iota is acceptable when it has only one argument:
myArray.length.iota...
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 06:37:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
import std.algorithm;
import std.range;
immutable(int[]) _items = 1.iota(4).array;
UFCS iota :puke:
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 21:48:16 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
The term "pure function" is only needed in a non-functional
language.
Applicative/functional languages only have mathematical
functions, no
need for the term "pure" there.
In discussions about e.g. Haskell, it is often used to denote
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 00:27:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/15/14, 2:52 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/15/2014 08:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Purity of allocation is frequently assumed by functional
languages
Examples?
cons 1 2 is equal to cons 1 2
...
I don't see anythin
84 matches
Mail list logo
