On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:13:23 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
Negligence to
do so is, to me, either extreme laziness or lack of respect to
the reader.
neither, in fact. i believe that those rules are useless and senseless
now, so it's more
Added ebuild:
* dub 0.9.21
Updated ebuilds:
* GDC based on GCC 4.8.3 and DMD FE 2.065
* DMD 2.066.0 and tools
I wonder if I can switch to linking with libphobos2.so now
by default for dmd? Any outstanding issues/objections?
--
Marco
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a one man crusade.
It's not a one man's crusade, it affects legibility and creates
dissonance within the text.
It also appears
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a one man crusade.
It's not a one man's crusade, it affects
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:55:36 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
It also appears unprofessional and uneducated.
so i am.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 00:01:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:54:18 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 09:43:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm judging by both the responses in this thread
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 08:39:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 00:01:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:54:18 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 09:43:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright
On 2014-08-30 00:40, Szymon Gatner wrote:
But there is still a matter of ARM/iOS runtime correct?
Yes, but that is nothing I'm working on. Although other people are
working on that.
Those merges will go to 2.067?
I have no idea.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a one man crusade.
It's not a one man's crusade, it affects
On 2014-08-29 23:00, simendsjo wrote:
It's still available at dsource: http://www.dsource.org/projects/ares
I don't think he's referring to Ares, he's referring to some other D
runtime.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
An update to DAuth is out:
https://github.com/Abscissa/DAuth
Main Changes:
- Add support for DMD 2.066 (Now supports v2.064.2 through v2.066.0)
- Supports crypt(3)-style hash strings for MS5, SHA-256 and SHA-512.
- Improved README
- Improved API Reference - now uses ddox.
Full ChangeLog:
On 8/30/2014 6:29 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
An update to DAuth is out:
https://github.com/Abscissa/DAuth
Main Changes:
- Add support for DMD 2.066 (Now supports v2.064.2 through v2.066.0)
- Supports crypt(3)-style hash strings for MS5, SHA-256 and SHA-512.
Would you believe *MD5*, not MS5.
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Stop being such a grammar nazi.
I didn't bring it up because I felt like being pedantic, I
brought it up as a suggestion to make it more pleasant to read.
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:13:23 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
Negligence to do so is, to me, either extreme laziness or lack
of respect to the reader.
On 8/30/2014 5:38 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
˙ǝƃɐnƃuɐן uʍo ɹıǝɥʇ ǝʇıɹʍ ɹo ʞɐǝds pןnoɥs ʎǝɥʇ ʍoɥ uo ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ
ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ oʇ ƃuıʎɹʇ sʎɐʍןɐ ǝɹɐ ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ-uou ʇɐɥʇ snoıɹɐןıɥ ʇı puıɟ
sʎɐʍןɐ I
I'm a native English speaker. Uncapitalized I makes a writer come
across like a common leet-speak
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:44:18 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Stop being such a grammar nazi.
I didn't bring it up because I felt like being pedantic, I
brought it up as
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:49:33 UTC, Mengu wrote:
i will join you in your fight. i do not use upper case letters
when writing both in english and turkish. i find these rules
utterly useless as well.
the funny thing is that there are movements that fight for a
revision of written
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:37:12 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 04:23:28 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 00:32:20 UTC, Mike wrote:
I'm asking this community to consider setting a new precedent
for druntime: reduce the scope to just the language
On 2014-08-29 15:46:32 +, Jacob Carlborg said:
On 2014-08-29 16:06, Szymon Gatner wrote:
If that is indeed the case then this is huge for me. I am doing 32bit
Win apps and their iOS versions. The moment I will be able to use D
libraries on both platforms I will totaly do it. In fact I
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:27:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:44:18 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
There is no question that failing to
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:19:55 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 8/30/2014 5:38 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
˙ǝƃɐnƃuɐן uʍo ɹıǝɥʇ ǝʇıɹʍ ɹo ʞɐǝds pןnoɥs ʎǝɥʇ ʍoɥ uo ǝןdoǝd
ɥsıןƃuƎ
ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ oʇ ƃuıʎɹʇ sʎɐʍןɐ ǝɹɐ ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ-uou ʇɐɥʇ snoıɹɐןıɥ
ʇı puıɟ
sʎɐʍןɐ I
I'm a native English
Just a correction:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:44:20 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
should learn the difference between pedantry and Nazism.
I meant:
Since you've already labelled *me*
Anyways.
Would it be possible to support bcrypt style password hashing?
The one key feature of it is that it encrypts/hashes the password
many times to slow down brute force attacks. Hash algorithms are
too fast to prevent this.
On 2014-08-30 14:31, Robert M. Münch wrote:
That's cool stuff.
How will Swift influence this? I'm pretty sure that Apple's strategy is
to get rid of Objective-C ASAP and use Swift whereever possible.
Swift is ABI compatible with Objective-C. So anything that works across
Swift and
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 21:20:48 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
- Mouse hovering over an auto keyword will show the resolved
type
- How is this implemented?
- Will this expand to cover any expression at the cursor in the
future? This would be a super promotor for introducing D to
On 8/30/2014 10:19 AM, Casey wrote:
Would it be possible to support bcrypt style password hashing? The one
key feature of it is that it encrypts/hashes the password many times to
slow down brute force attacks. Hash algorithms are too fast to prevent
this.
DAuth is designed for everything to
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:49:07 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
yes, yes and yes!
You forgot the Oxford comma :o). -- Andrei
yes, yes, and yes!
fixed, ready to another round of reviews. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/28/2014 2:53 AM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
I should have said that in D it is used when declaring an instance
(i.e. at the place of the instance declaration) whereas in the
patent it is used when declaring the type. For a patent lawyer, this
will be enough to say
Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/28/2014 11:53 AM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
...
I should have said that in D it is used when declaring an instance
(i.e. at the place of the instance declaration) whereas in the
patent it is used when declaring the type. For a patent lawyer, this
will be enough to
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 03:54:41 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On 8/29/2014 2:52 PM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 19:01:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/29/14, 3:53 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
Jacob Carlborg just recently
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 20:54:49 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
I would now like to invoke the Zero One Infinity
Rule(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_one_infinity_rule).
Supporting one format makes sense - DUB can simply use the set
of functions and data structures provided by Phobos or by
On 8/30/14, 2:35 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 18:57:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/29/14, 12:40 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Vic, I posted the job to the D Developer Network at LinkedIn:
On 8/30/14, 5:18 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have likely missed several points but overall it seem pretty clear to
me that all requests / concerns have not been addressed and this
proposal is not yet ready for another round of review.
How do the remaining issues break down into QoI that can be
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 09:00:24 UTC, Jérôme M. Berger
wrote:
Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/28/2014 11:53 AM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
...
I should have said that in D it is used when declaring an
instance
(i.e. at the place of the instance declaration) whereas in the
patent it is used
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 09:37:55 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 20:54:49 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
I would now like to invoke the Zero One Infinity
Rule(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_one_infinity_rule).
Supporting one format makes sense - DUB can simply use the
Hello.
there are some c-style array declarations both in druntime and in
phobos. i made two patches that fixes 'em:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13402
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:57:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hello.
there are some c-style array declarations both in druntime and
in
phobos. i made two patches that fixes 'em:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13402
If
On 8/25/2014 12:40 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Hello everyone,
[endless discussion]
Anyone seen the mystery/comedy/detective show Monk?
I've been watching it lately. One interesting quirk about the main
character Adrian Monk (a character who's humorously *loaded* with
quirks) is that one
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:31:13 +
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
If you want to contribute, please create pull requests on github:
sorry, i'm not using github and not planning to register on github
either. i have a personal reason for it.
It's doubtful
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.103.1409399655.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
sorry, i'm not using github and not planning to register on github
either. i have a personal reason for it.
That's your choice, but if you want to contribute patches to the compiler or
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 22:25:18 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
That's your choice, but if you want to contribute patches to the
compiler or libraries you will need to get over it and make an
account.
not *that* much. ok, i got the point and will not make
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:40:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 8/25/2014 12:40 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
We are Adrian Monk. We can't handle choice. ;)
You may say anything you want, but I love Monk. And the actor
impersonating him is just either a genius, either suffer from teh
On 30 Aug 2014 12:35, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:57:51 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Hello.
there are some c-style array declarations both in druntime and in
phobos. i made two patches that fixes 'em:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 02:11:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
API must specify a strong stance on threading, whatever the
form it takes
Does not seem to be addressed at all. At least I see no
mentions of it in core.d documentation and logger instance
itself is plain __gshared thing.
I'm not
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote in
message news:mailman.107.1409402768.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Responses like this aren't particularly useful either. We have a 'patch'
keyword in bugzilla
(from memory), and people are free to use that as a tool to
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 02:11:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Jakob Ovrum
The *API* must support minimal dynamic memory allocation for
the normal execution path. However, theoretical *implementation*
changes that reduce
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 09:54:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/30/14, 5:18 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have likely missed several points but overall it seem pretty
clear to
me that all requests / concerns have not been addressed and
this
proposal is not yet ready for another round of
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:08:05PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 09:54:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/30/14, 5:18 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have likely missed several points but overall it seem pretty clear
to me that all requests / concerns have
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 13:35:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
How do the remaining issues break down into QoI that can be
deferred
to a future release? -- Andrei
What is QoI? I am not familiar with this abbreviation
Quality of Implementation.
And how can one break issues
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:37:15PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 13:35:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
How do the remaining issues break down into QoI that can be deferred
to a future release? -- Andrei
What is QoI? I am not familiar with
I agree with Iain, we should respect opinion of people trying to
stay away from intrusive ecosystems like GitHub. While
probability of someone picking the patches and proceeding with
them is low (and we shouldn't give false hopes) there is no place
for GitHub or GTFO reaction. It is just rude.
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 13:37:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 13:35:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
How do the remaining issues break down into QoI that can be
deferred
to a future release? -- Andrei
What is QoI? I am not familiar with this
On 30 Aug 2014 14:05, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote in
message news:mailman.107.1409402768.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Responses like this aren't particularly useful either. We have
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:10:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by
incompetence. -- Napoleon Bonaparte
True in casual setting, but false in professional field.
Incompetence is equivalent to malice there.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:40:49PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree with Iain, we should respect opinion of people trying to stay
away from intrusive ecosystems like GitHub. While probability of
someone picking the patches and proceeding with them is low (and we
shouldn't give
Dicebot wrote in message news:mrhmerdjofsrcltlg...@forum.dlang.org...
I agree with Iain, we should respect opinion of people trying to stay away
from intrusive ecosystems like GitHub. While probability of someone
picking the patches and proceeding with them is low (and we shouldn't give
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:08:56 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Dicebot wrote in message
news:mrhmerdjofsrcltlg...@forum.dlang.org...
I agree with Iain, we should respect opinion of people trying
to stay away from intrusive ecosystems like GitHub. While
probability of someone picking the
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:06:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I can't believe you people would waste hours on a useless
discussion,
when it takes just 5 minutes to generate PR's from the OP's
patches:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/939
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:09:02 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I'm yet to hear an actual reason why taking the 5 minutes to create a
github account is too hard.
'cause i don't want to be a part of github. i'd better eat dirt.
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 02:19:39PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:06:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I can't believe you people would waste hours on a useless discussion,
when it takes just 5 minutes to generate PR's from the OP's patches:
Dicebot wrote in message news:xovsaqnanmmgaltip...@forum.dlang.org...
It is not hard, it is plain unacceptable for certain people. Call that
religious reasons.
Using github is similar to our requirement to match the code style when
submitting patches. It's non-negotiable, because there's
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:18:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is not hard, it is plain unacceptable for certain people.
Call that religious reasons.
You should accept bug reports with complete or incomplete patches
in order to reach stability.
You cannot expect anyone to figure out how to
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:38:10 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.120.1409408631.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
'cause i don't want to be a part of github. i'd better eat
dirt.
It's a shame that your dislike of github is stronger
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.120.1409408631.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
'cause i don't want to be a part of github. i'd better eat dirt.
It's a shame that your dislike of github is stronger than your desire to
contribute code.
Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote in message
news:pmrjlrkkaaiguefnq...@forum.dlang.org...
Here is a good reason: «I have no interest in learning github, and I
personally don't care if you accept this patch, but here you have it in
case you want to improve your system».
Here is another good reason:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:32:01 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Dicebot wrote in message
news:xovsaqnanmmgaltip...@forum.dlang.org...
It is not hard, it is plain unacceptable for certain people.
Call that religious reasons.
Using github is similar to our requirement to match the code
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:32:01 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Using github is similar to our requirement to match the code
style when submitting patches. It's non-negotiable, because
there's no good reason not to do it. You just remove those
tabs, then get on with it.
Here is a good
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:35:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:32:01 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
Using github is similar to our requirement to match the code
style when submitting patches. It's non-negotiable, because
there's no good reason not to do
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:32:06 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
or just not submitting patches. keep complaining about alot of people
speaking but not writing the code. good luck with it but i'm off. i'm
perfectly comfortable with supporting patches by myself
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:37:54 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
If it takes longer to work out how to submit a pull request
than make your patch, your patch probably wasn't worth doing.
I don't see any reasonable argument to support this view. A
critical patch can be very small.
Telling
Dicebot wrote in message news:hvwtyelwvrsrgvbcq...@forum.dlang.org...
No it is not. GitHub is an intrusive closed ecosystem and it is legitimate
concern for anyone caring about the open internet. The fact that I have
considered D contribution more important than this concern and the fact
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:46:50 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i'm
perfectly comfortable with supporting patches by myself and
applying
'em to my local builds.
I hope you keep making your patches available online. I am
interested in your patches that fix the syntax issues that
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:38:16 +1000
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It's a shame that your dislike of github is stronger than your desire
to contribute code.
i wasn't signed any agreements about i have to eat github if i want
make D better. i was thinking that
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:50:58 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I hope you keep making your patches available online. I am
interested in your patches that fix the syntax issues that D
suffer from. I am sure others are too.
i'm planning to make website with my patches
Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote in message
news:imcohxrhmfpkgjbtm...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't see any reasonable argument to support this view. A critical patch
can be very small.
It's an exaggeration, but still usually true. Most patches take some
non-trivial work to create and debug, no
On 8/30/2014 4:22 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= schue...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 03:54:41 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On 8/29/2014 2:52 PM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 19:01:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.125.1409410701.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
yet the first answers i got were github or GTFO! note that i wasn't
wrote a single word about take this patches or they will rot in
bugzilla forever in my original message. just plain
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 15:03:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i'm planning to make website with my patches that fixes those
cosmetic
issues that can't find their way in mainline. using vibe.d, of
course. ;-) i'll publish my build scripts and patchsets on the
site and
will keep
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:58:12PM +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
yet the first answers i got were github or GTFO! note that i wasn't
wrote a single word about take this patches or they will rot in
bugzilla forever in my original message. just plain info for those
who interested.
On 30/08/14 16:38, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It's a shame that your dislike of github is stronger than your desire to
contribute code.
I'm sorry, that won't wash. It's a given, especially now, that for some people,
using these large-scale online social networks is a no-no. Many
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 15:18:52 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On 8/30/2014 4:22 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 03:54:41 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On 8/29/2014 2:52 PM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday, 29
On 8/30/2014 10:35 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
The problem is not only dereferencing those pointers (though depending
on how the GC works even this might be racy, i.e. the memory location
could have been reused already), but that a destructor/finalizer already
ran
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:41:08 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
So it's welcome help, but there's still the actual work that
needs to be done by someone else: Not only the pull, but the
review, sticking with the review, etc...
Sure.
I can also appreciate that filing a bug is work in
Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 30/08/14 16:38, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It's a shame that your dislike of github is stronger than your desire to
contribute code.
I'm sorry, that won't wash. It's a given, especially now, that for
On 30 Aug 2014 15:07, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:40:49PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree with Iain, we should respect opinion of people trying to stay
away from intrusive ecosystems like GitHub. While
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 15:25:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please don't stop submitting patches. I'll turn them into PRs.
Even though everything submitted to Bugzilla is supposed to be
public domain, it would be nice to keep authorship information in
the commit
Iain,
gdmd was in gdc-4.6 but as far as I can tell it is not in gdc-4.9.1. Is
gdmd an ex-thing? In a sense I hope so as it required the environment
variable $HOME to be set and this is a problem for SCons testing.
Basically we have failing tests on gdc-4.6 based machines but not on
gdc-4.9.1
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:33:12 +
David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Even though everything submitted to Bugzilla is supposed to be
public domain, it would be nice to keep authorship information in
the commit messages.
in my case -- i don't care. i just
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 11:44 +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transatlantic_Trade_and_Investment_Partnership#National_sovereignty_and_Investor_State_Dispute_Settlements_.28ISDS.29
I don't want to live on this planet anymore _
..yet again.
But we have
On 30 Aug 2014 17:47, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
Iain,
gdmd was in gdc-4.6 but as far as I can tell it is not in gdc-4.9.1. Is
gdmd an ex-thing? In a sense I hope so as it required the environment
variable $HOME to be set and this is a problem for SCons testing.
Basically we
Iain,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 18:07 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[…]
Yes, gdmd is no longer integrated. Is now an external tool.
Thanks muchly for the very rapid answer.
OK so gdmd gone from gdc, but I don't see a gdmd package in Debian. Is
gdmd not packaged but just a downloadable thing?
--
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:47:47 +0100
Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Is gdmd an ex-thing?
it is now in it's own repository:
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD.git
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 30 Aug 2014 18:11, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
Iain,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 18:07 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[…]
Yes, gdmd is no longer integrated. Is now an external tool.
Thanks muchly for the very rapid answer.
OK so gdmd gone from gdc, but I don't see a gdmd
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:20:42 +0100
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I had hoped that someone would rewrite it in D, and a start
was made, but never completed (I never saw a PR).
funny thing is that i made the exact opposite: wrote kdmd which
translates dmd args
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 15:18:34 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.125.1409410701.5783.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
yet the first answers i got were github or GTFO! note that i
wasn't
wrote a single word about take this patches or they
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 16:33:13 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 15:25:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please don't stop submitting patches. I'll turn them into PRs.
Even though everything submitted to Bugzilla is supposed to be
public domain, it
I think it would be helpful to have the d lang site host
tutorials/lessons on various aspects of D. D is hard to use for
certain things like gui's, graphics(ogl, dx, etc), etc... not
necessarily because D can't do these things but because the
information is not out there.
If The D site
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:48 +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
maybe i should write gdmd too, just for completeness sake. ;-)
Two alternatives I think:
1. Rewrite it in something other than Perl, D or Python mayhap.
2. Let it pass away into history.
--
Russel.
On 8/30/14, 4:42 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:37:15PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 13:35:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
How do the remaining issues break down into QoI that can be deferred
to a future
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
