std.algorithm.reverse uses ranges, and shamefully DMD is really
bad at optimizing away range-induced costs.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Issue ID: 14391
Summary: Assigning to module results in unhelpful error message
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14207
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Hardware|x86
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 13:25:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:49:36 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Is there any way (or could there be any way, in the future) of
getting the code from lambda expressions as a string?
I've noticed that if I have an error with a
Thanks to the correct
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 04:11:02 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
was it a conscious decision to make the AA [] operator not work
like map/etc in C++?
What do you mean?
Currently in object.d in druntime there's
a template, RTInfo, declared something
like this:
[snip]
Thanks for the breakdown! Those pull requests make a lot more
sense when read in the proper context ;)
The main reason for implementing RTInfo
for modules is to implement reflection.
With the
On 4/1/15 3:49 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/31/2015 08:20 PM, cym13 wrote:
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
We made a massive jump towards the upper ranks.
[snip]
This is amazing work. Thanks! -- Andrei
New questions are sorry, but I have a few minor problems. Where
can I find / install these dependencies?
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent_pthreads
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:30:01 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Since the weekend Dgame went into the release phase:
https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1
http://dgame-dev.de/?page=download
The Website (http://dgame-dev.de/) is fully updated and should
be useable on every
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 02:36:52 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:30:01 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Since the weekend Dgame went into the release phase:
https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1
http://dgame-dev.de/?page=download
The Website
On 04/02/2015 01:39 AM, bearophile wrote:
built-in functions for arithmetics with overflow checking
Your persistent interest in integer overflow checks make we wonder if
you were responsible for this?
http://www.around.com/ariane.html
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:30:01 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Since the weekend Dgame went into the release phase:
https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1
http://dgame-dev.de/?page=download
The Website (http://dgame-dev.de/) is fully updated and should
be useable on every
On 04/02/2015 03:35 AM, weaselcat wrote:
the benchmark pointed out two sore areas in D(AA and std.json,) would be
nice to see AA get updated as I often completely avoid using the
built-in AA.
I filed two ERs already, both are pretty isolated and not too hard to
implement. I hope I don't have
Yess.but there are LOTS of nodes/BTree, and each node would need to
check whether the btFile was already initialized, et (ugh!) cetera. So
while possible, that's an even worse answer than depending on people
closing the BTree properly. I *am* going to separate the close routine
from the
On 2/04/2015 8:42 a.m., Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 05:23:18 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This is a primarily a french license. It took me a good while to
understand that it was compatible with e.g. MIT.
Compatible in what way? Isn't CeCILL a copyleft license?
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 03:55:53 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/02/2015 03:35 AM, weaselcat wrote:
the benchmark pointed out two sore areas in D(AA and
std.json,) would be
nice to see AA get updated as I often completely avoid using
the
built-in AA.
I filed two ERs already, both are
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14389
--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
or simply introduce syntax to unattribute something. this is much more
useful, imo, and not breaking any existing code.
by the way:
class C {
private:
@safe:
void foo() {}
public:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14389
--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
p.s. the funny technical note: compiler has no mention of throw or impure
functions (i.e. you can't set that flags by simply changing the parser). what
compiler has is three states (for
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:21:46 UTC, Mike James wrote:
Just a thought...
How about adding the keyword 'with' to 'import' to save on
typing :-)
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Canvas,
org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite,
org.eclipse.swt.events.DisposeListener,
Following recent IRC discussion.
I want to write a generic list aggregate function that works with
builtin types like int[] as well as custom classes/structs that
define front, empty, popFront:
import std.range;
ElementType!S aggregate(alias func, S)(S list, ElementType!S
accum =
On 04/01/2015 10:57 AM, Dzugaru wrote:
ElementType!S aggregate(alias func, S)(S list, ElementType!S accum =
ElementType!S.init)
if(is(typeof(func(accum, accum)) == typeof(accum))) {
[...]
}
I can't explain exactly why that doesn't work.
However, I've discovered a number of times that
On 04/01/2015 11:15 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Instead of using
ElementType!S in the parameter list, introduce a third one (E), which
you check in the template constraint:
ElementType!S aggregate(alias func, S, E)(S list, E accum = E.init)
if(is (E == ElementType!S)// --
The class Node is contained within the struct BTree.
The field btFile is contained within the struct BTree.
The statement is within a function within the Node class.
I've tried many variations, here are a few:
btFile.write(self.nodeId, cast(void*)(self));
results in:
need 'this' for 'btFile'
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 08:52:06 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Oh boy all classes with one-liner non-final methods. Manu must
be dancing a gig right now :o). -- Andrei
Yes, the right default for D language should be final, because
lot of programmers are lazy and they
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 20:07:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Consider the code:
struct Foo { C obj; }
@safe void bar(C c, Foo* f) { f.obj = c; }
Under the proposal, for @safe code, this would have to be
written as:
@safe void bar(static C c, Foo* f) ...
Either that, or:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 15:22:10 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Compile Time Function Evaluation (CTFE) is a very powerful tool
to avoid having to enter in to all that C++ style mess.
Yes, CTFE in D really cool. Thanks.
I need to implement arithmetic (addition / subtraction) only use
the type
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 17:57:12 UTC, Dzugaru wrote:
Following recent IRC discussion.
I want to write a generic list aggregate function that works
with builtin types like int[] as well as custom classes/structs
that define front, empty, popFront:
import std.range;
ElementType!S
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:13:15 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:57 AM, Dzugaru wrote:
ElementType!S aggregate(alias func, S)(S list, ElementType!S
accum =
ElementType!S.init)
if(is(typeof(func(accum, accum)) == typeof(accum))) {
[...]
}
I can't explain exactly why that
Since the weekend Dgame went into the release phase:
https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1
http://dgame-dev.de/?page=download
The Website (http://dgame-dev.de/) is fully updated and should
be useable on every device. Please let me know if you noticed
unexpected behavior (at
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 17:03:34 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 15:22:10 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Compile Time Function Evaluation (CTFE) is a very powerful tool
to avoid having to enter in to all that C++ style mess.
Yes, CTFE in D really cool. Thanks.
I need
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is a tooling issue.
I think D's built-in unittest blocks are a mistake.
Yes, they are simple and for simple functions and algorithms they
work pretty well.
However, when you have a big complex project you start having
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 17:51:40 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 17:03:34 UTC, Dennis Ritchie
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 15:22:10 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Compile Time Function Evaluation (CTFE) is a very powerful
tool
to avoid having to enter in to all
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:13:15 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:57 AM, Dzugaru wrote:
ElementType!S aggregate(alias func, S)(S list, ElementType!S
accum =
ElementType!S.init)
if(is(typeof(func(accum, accum)) == typeof(accum))) {
[...]
}
I can't explain exactly why that
a)
isn't this almost, if not exactly, the same as
std.algorithm.reduce?
b)
you can write nice things like this:
auto min = [2,4,1,3,5].aggregate!((a, b) = a b ? a :
b)(int.max);
c)
the deduction failure looks like a bug to me, perhaps there is
a good reason why it can't work in the
On 04/01/2015 11:27 AM, Dzugaru wrote:
This code does work when you provide second (non-default) argument to
function, and doesn't if you do not (no way it can deduce E solely from
checks I assume).
My version, in constract, works when you do not provide second argument
and doesn't if you
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 14:05:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-03-31 23:14, Idan Arye wrote:
Building by unittest name! Imagine - instead of placing
temporary code
in `main` to develop a new feature or fix a bug, you put in a
named
unittest and tell your IDE/build-system to only
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:20:41 UTC, Dzugaru wrote:
a)
isn't this almost, if not exactly, the same as
std.algorithm.reduce?
b)
you can write nice things like this:
auto min = [2,4,1,3,5].aggregate!((a, b) = a b ? a :
b)(int.max);
c)
the deduction failure looks like a bug to me,
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 14:07:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-01 00:02, Idan Arye wrote:
I think you and I work under different assumptions of the
goals for this
feature. If we only want unittest names to be something that
can be
printed when the unittest runner runs the
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:04:31 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is a tooling issue.
I think D's built-in unittest blocks are a mistake.
Yes, they are simple and for simple functions and algorithms
they
work pretty
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:35:14 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
The problem is not with running the tests, it's with building
them. In heavily templated libraries(like, for example Phobos),
building without unittests takes seconds and building with
unitetests takes minutes - mainly because the
The way I have set it up personally, there is a single
/etc/dmd.conf for latest released package and bunch of
~/devel/dlang-X/bin folders, each with own dmd binary and own
dmd.conf side by side with that dmd binary - all added to PATH.
Seems to pick up the matching one depending on which
On 1 April 2015 at 21:39, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:49:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
fwiw - very much appreciate your volunteer effort and that you probably
have better things to do. but in case you weren't aware and did have
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:36:53 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 19:04:43 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:16:58 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Actually metaprogramming is how a lot of magic happens in Java and
.NET.
without on-the-fly code generation that's a
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:26:49 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote:
Perhaps BTree needs to be a class?
yes
On 2015-04-01 at 16:52, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 14:22:57 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:35:05 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:09:12 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2015-03-31 at 22:56, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
1mm allocations
2.066:
On 2015-04-01 12:21, Mike James wrote:
Just a thought...
How about adding the keyword 'with' to 'import' to save on typing :-)
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Canvas,
org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite,
org.eclipse.swt.events.DisposeListener,
On 04/01/2015 11:39 AM, anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:26:49 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote:
Perhaps BTree needs to be a class?
yes
Thanks.
Sigh. I was hoping to preserve the determinate closing that one gets
with a struct.
P.S. I hate all the Ruby testing facilities, hate with bloody
passion.
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 19:04:43 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:16:58 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Actually metaprogramming is how a lot of magic happens in Java
and .NET.
without on-the-fly code generation that's a mockery.
You can generate code on the fly as well, that is a
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:49:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
fwiw - very much appreciate your volunteer effort and that you
probably have better things to do. but in case you weren't
aware and did have time to look: I get the same linker error
for _mulodi4. gdc works. (Arch ARM).
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:37:24 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/01/2015 11:27 AM, Dzugaru wrote:
This code does work when you provide second (non-default)
argument to
function, and doesn't if you do not (no way it can deduce E
solely from
checks I assume).
My version, in constract,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #2 from Temtaime temta...@gmail.com ---
Seems that without -lib behavior is incorrect then.
--
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 05:23:18 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This is a primarily a french license. It took me a good while
to understand that it was compatible with e.g. MIT.
Compatible in what way? Isn't CeCILL a copyleft license? (It's
not 100% obvious to me whether strong or weak
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:26:49 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote:
Perhaps BTree needs to be a class? I made it a struct because
I want it to definitely close properly when it
goes out of scope.
Maybe `scoped` can help:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.scoped
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:18:52 +, Kapps wrote:
Everything you propose can be done with a custom unittest runner, using
the builtin unittest blocks. Compile-time reflection + UDAs + unittests
is a surprisingly powerful combination, and I don't understand the
proposals to make unittest name
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:30:01 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Since the weekend Dgame went into the release phase:
https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1
http://dgame-dev.de/?page=download
The Website (http://dgame-dev.de/) is fully updated and should
be useable on every
On 2015-04-01 20:35, Idan Arye wrote:
If we could tell the compiler to only build a single, specific test the
development cycle can become orders of magnitude faster.
There should be a lot of option to run tests:
* Base on a file
* Line number
* Name
* Tag
And so on.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-04-01 20:04, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
By the way, this is the way we do it in Crystal. The source code
for the spec library is here, if you need some inspiration:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/tree/master/src/spec . It's
just 687 lines long.
Ahhh, looks like my old buddy RSpec
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:16:58 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Actually metaprogramming is how a lot of magic happens in Java and .NET.
without on-the-fly code generation that's a mockery.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:50:19 +, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
At least a reference to another (concurrent!) language is not so good.
why, C/C++ aren't a rivals. it's like telling that mongolfier (C/C++) is
a rival to jet airplane (D).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 4/1/15 3:57 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-01 20:04, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
By the way, this is the way we do it in Crystal. The source code
for the spec library is here, if you need some inspiration:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/tree/master/src/spec . It's
just 687 lines
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:04:31 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is a tooling issue.
I think D's built-in unittest blocks are a mistake.
Yes, they are simple and for simple functions and algorithms
they
work pretty
2015-04-01 13:54 GMT+02:00 Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com:
There are more types of abstractions than just classes vs interfaces. What
goes into a module for example is a prime example of an abstraction. A
purpose.
Which also have it's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Temtaime temta...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temta...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On 03/31/2015 05:12 PM, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually thought about the whole it should fail to build if any of
the unit tests fail idea 2 or 3 weeks ago, so this sounds good.
WRT to the error messages and their recognition by text editors, a
_massive_ improvement would be compiler-assisted
(not translated into D yet)
http://blog.mgm-tp.com/2013/12/benchmarking-g1-and-other-java-7-garbage-collectors/
http://www.mm-net.org.uk/resources/benchmarks.html
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/GC/sourcecode.html
http://yoda.arachsys.com/csharp/benchmark.html
it's possible we already have
On 04/01/2015 11:25 AM, Charles Hixson via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The class Node is contained within the struct BTree.
The field btFile is contained within the struct BTree.
The statement is within a function within the Node class.
I've tried many variations, here are a few:
On 04/01/2015 10:31 PM, novice2 wrote:
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
Even more interesting a complete blog post about devirtualization.
http://hubicka.blogspot.de/2014/02/devirtualization-in-c-part-4-analyzing.html
On 04/01/2015 10:31 PM, novice2 wrote:
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
You could do it as part of LTO or whole program optimization.
It requires another compiler/linker phase, so it's not easy to achieve,
maybe the LDC/GDC people have LTO running?
GCC5 comes with a big
Phobos documentation was restructured, and the new structure is
good. However, changing the URLs for the documentation has left
behind a few broken links, some of which I'm seeign in Google
search results. For example, this page I just saw.
http://dlang.org/library/std/traits/ValueType.html
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Temtaime from comment #1)
I think current behavior is correct.
-od is not just for the output file, but also for intermediate files (.obj).
-of should override -od for
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:35 +, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
people with Java/C/C++/etc. background tend to forget about the
power of
metaprogramming: they have no such tool at hand, so they don't even
think
about it.
Java metaprogramming is a real pain, so just use Groovy. (Though
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14389
Issue ID: 14389
Summary: The (attributelist): attribute notation scope of
effect
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14389
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14390
Issue ID: 14390
Summary: [REG2.068a] ICE or bad has forward references error
with circular class structure
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 18:04:31 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is a tooling issue.
I think D's built-in unittest blocks are a mistake.
Yes, they are simple and for simple functions and algorithms
they
work pretty
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 19:31:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
P.S. I hate all the Ruby testing facilities, hate with bloody
passion.
You're going to _love_ my DConf talk ;) I was expecting that
already, you let me know what you thought of them last year!
Atila
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:31:18 UTC, novice2 wrote:
I am sorry for so dumb question, but:
when peoples talking about D and speed,
then they always say mark method final.
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
afaik there's no reason the compiler couldn't infer it for
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3
2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do you
think you need?
If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If building
ldc itself will be
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 07:48 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Everybody compared to nobody. It's a statistics thing :o).
You keep pulling me up for linguistic and logical inexactness, I feel
no compunction…
I trust your bit of the Alexandrescu tribe is doing well given the
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 19:04 +, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:16:58 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Actually metaprogramming is how a lot of magic happens in Java and
.NET.
without on-the-fly code generation that's a mockery.
You must not have done much JVM-based
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14389
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Čejchan czda...@gmail.com ---
@Adam D. Ruppe:(In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #1)
class C {
private:
@safe:
void foo() {}
}
Should foo still be private? I think a lot of people use this pattern
On 4/1/2015 10:00 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= schue...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 20:07:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Consider the code:
struct Foo { C obj; }
@safe void bar(C c, Foo* f) { f.obj = c; }
Under the proposal, for @safe code, this would have to be written
I am sorry for so dumb question, but:
when peoples talking about D and speed,
then they always say mark method final.
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 19:39:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:49:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
fwiw - very much appreciate your volunteer effort and that you
probably have better things to do. but in case you weren't
aware and did have time to look: I get the same
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 22:15:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:31 PM, novice2 wrote:
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
You could do it as part of LTO or whole program optimization.
It requires another compiler/linker phase, so it's not easy to
achieve,
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 22:30:55 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 22:15:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:31 PM, novice2 wrote:
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
You could do it as part of LTO or whole program optimization.
It
On 03/31/2015 08:20 PM, cym13 wrote:
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
We made a massive jump towards the upper ranks.
#4 ¹
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/tree/master/brainfuck#user-content-benchmark-benchb
#2
Walter Bright:
I'm thinking of a modest step which would be a subset of your
proposal:
1. implement 'scope' and 'return' for arrays, classes, and
pointers
2. implement inference for templates and lambdas
3. enable it with the -dip25 switch
and see how far that takes us.
This is
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
