On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 08:06:03 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
I better also mention that the problem is the same for floats
in Lexer::inreal(Token *).
Ignore that - it's always read/written as a long double.
Sorry for then noise.
On 2015-04-02 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
I don't think anyone is going to put those in a same inline style as
unittest blocks, so this is not truly relevant. At least I hope so.
You mean inline with the code it tests? No, I hope so too. I put my unit
tests in separate files as well, but that's
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
Andrei
Regarding C++
Greetings to all!
I work on Windows with cp1251 and I have a mistake in the program:
import std.stdio;
int main (string [] args) {
string nameFile = `«Ёлки с объектами №876».txt`;
File f = File (nameFile, w);
f.writeln (Greetings!);
return 0;
}
This mistake of a kind:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Issue ID: 14402
Summary: std.conv.emplace for classes segfaults for nested
class
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Matt Kline mkline.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkline.o...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14397
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment #1 from
According to the documentation
https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/yeby3zcb.aspx, _wfopen
already takes a wide-character string, not an ANSI string.
So
return _wfopen(name.tempCStringW(), mode.tempCStringW());
would be the correct way. All these weird ansi versions are
Windows
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14401
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10606
Daniel Kozak kozz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
hi!
i'm trying to run OpenVG examples in D. So far i have compiled
ShivaVG (an implementation of OpenVG standard) in C++ and created
a shared library. Now i'd like to link my OpenVG.lib with a D
program.
(the library was compiled with msvc2013x86, i'd like to avoid
switching compiler)
to
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
Andrei
Are there any
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 04:55:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 09:38:05 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Dgame is based on SDL 2.0.3 (as described in the installation
tutorial), but tries to wrap any function call which is
introduced after SDL 2.0.0:
static if
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Ivan Kazmenko ga...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
--- Comment #1 from
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
Chapel 1.11 just got release and they are making a big play on the
integration of Chapel with Python. This could be huge and potentially
disrupt the complacency of the NumPy based folk.
Chapel is a rather pleasant PGAS language that makes parallelism and
clustering quite nice. Certainly if the
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
That's great news, looking
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14395
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
Jens Bauer wrote in message news:ckqcspcptqazbawds...@forum.dlang.org...
Well, it seems I found the problem.
lexer.h, line 203 reads:
Yeah, I thought it might be that.
Looking for union-tricks, I also found ...
stringtable.c:24 hash will not be the same value on Big Endian,
Mixed Endian
The decision, which I have applied using function
fromUtf8toAnsiW() already works correctly.
I use dmd 2.067.0
Well, it seems I found the problem.
lexer.h, line 203 reads:
union
{
d_int32 int32value;
d_uns32 uns32value;
d_int64 int64value;
d_uns64 uns64value;
...
...
...
};
While this optimization is neat, it does not produce correct
I better also mention that the problem is the same for floats in
Lexer::inreal(Token *).
On 2015-04-02 21:21, weaselcat wrote:
no
this is the reason java is unusable without an IDE.
Yeah, in a Java IDE it would automatically add the missing imports.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Matt Kline mkline.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std.conv.emplace for|std.conv.emplace segfaults
progress ... i think
in some forum posts i've read 64bit dmd uses a differnt linker
which supports coff
atleast i can now link my app in 64bit mode without errors
dmd -m64 source/app.d OpenVG.lib
also an exported test function prints to stdout, so my problem is
solved for x64 :)
if anyone
On 4/04/2015 1:00 a.m., ddos wrote:
progress ... i think
in some forum posts i've read 64bit dmd uses a differnt linker which
supports coff
atleast i can now link my app in 64bit mode without errors
dmd -m64 source/app.d OpenVG.lib
also an exported test function prints to stdout, so my problem
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14399
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 03:58:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:14:24 +, Pierre Krafft wrote:
What can replace malloc that can run on compile time and won't
make it
slower at run time?
this is actually two questions, so i'll answer to two questions.
1. What can replace
On 4/2/15 8:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hey folks, is there any way to figure out whether a type is immutable or
shared given its typeinfo? I see there's only the flags() method that
doesn't tell that. I'm thinking we'd do good to extend that.
This is needed for allocators. I'm thinking
On 4/3/15 2:26 AM, MGW wrote:
Greetings to all!
I work on Windows with cp1251 and I have a mistake in the program:
import std.stdio;
int main (string [] args) {
string nameFile = `«Ёлки с объектами №876».txt`;
File f = File (nameFile, w);
f.writeln (Greetings!);
return 0;
}
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14207
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[REG2.065] Assertion|[REG2.065] [CTFE] ICE on
Today I finally succeeded in building my first Hello World D
program (after fixing the endian problem).
Is there a way of setting the target section for a variable or an
array ?
Eg. the equivalent way of doing this using gcc is:
__attribute__((section(.isr_vector))) VectorFunc
On 3/30/15 11:25 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'll put in a doc PR to reference the D1 documentation.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/953
-Steve
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 03:58:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:14:24 +, Pierre Krafft wrote:
What can replace malloc that can run on compile time and won't
make it
slower at run time?
this is actually two questions, so i'll answer to two questions.
1. What can replace
On 4/3/15 1:30 AM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document. We're
staying the course with one important addition: switching to ddmd,
hopefully with 2.068.
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just don't have the champion for that yet. -- Andrei
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:39:35 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:22:43 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 13:59:34 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
I'm not sure if anybody ever used GDC/DMD/LDC on a big-endian
system.
LDC is endian-clean. I used LDC on
On 4/3/15 6:36 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Chapel overview: http://chapel.cray.com/overview.html
Their hello world examples do a fantastic job of illustrating their main
selling point. My hat's off to whoever put that on their site.
D may have difficulty coming up with something like that,
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:22:43 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 13:59:34 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'm not sure if anybody ever used GDC/DMD/LDC on a big-endian
system.
LDC is endian-clean. I used LDC on big-endian Linux/PPC64.
Unfortunately, I can't b uild LLVM on
Am Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:32:21 +
schrieb Jens Bauer doc...@who.no:
Well, it seems I found the problem.
lexer.h, line 203 reads:
union
{
d_int32 int32value;
d_uns32 uns32value;
d_int64 int64value;
d_uns64 uns64value;
...
You can convert to host encoding, gets more interesting if you
have worked with data from 390's.
Anyway here is the Newline reference from Unicode.
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch05.pdf#G10213
na
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 13:57:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On
On 2015-04-02 21:11, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
We can. But then it becomes harder to understand what's going on. In
RSpec I don't quite understand what's going on really, and I like a bit
of magic but not too much of it.
It's quite straightforward to implement, in Ruby as least. Something
like
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14403
Issue ID: 14403
Summary: DDox: std.algorithm index links are 404
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
URL: http://dlang.org/library/std/algorithm.html
OS: All
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14399
bb.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bb.t...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1 from
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 04:38:50 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 21:20:49 UTC, w0rp wrote:
We sould track down the old links and redirect to the new
documentation pages.
Working on a fix, will hopefully be deployed tomorrow.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:11:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 April 2015 at 17:58, Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d
Basically because it requires GCC 4.2 - but unfortunately
there's more.
Once upon a time, LLVM did support being built with GCC 4.2,
but I can't get
those sources anymore, so I
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just don't have the champion for that yet. -- Andrei
I might obviously be biased, but to be honest I don't see much
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:03:11 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 11:04:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Are there any plans for the creation of a powerful AST-macro
system in D?
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP50
No, Walter and Andrei are against it:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:10:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately has caught my eye as huge no in the
description. We must ban C style separate compilation,
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 23:23:27 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I might look into that, it's quite some work though.
Can we feed them the sitemap instead?
http://dlang.org/library/sitemap.xml
It looks like the sitemap has the IPv4 localhost IP address in
it, instead of the site's domain name.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:58:03 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Basically because it requires GCC 4.2 - but unfortunately
there's more.
Once upon a time, LLVM did support being built with GCC 4.2,
but I can't get those sources anymore, so I can't get a
'bootstrap LLVM' that way.
Can't you just
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:39:40 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:58:03 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Basically because it requires GCC 4.2 - but unfortunately
there's more.
Once upon a time, LLVM did support being built with GCC 4.2,
but I can't get those sources
Hi,
Is it possible to write on D recursion using std.variant?
-
#include boost/variant.hpp
#include iostream
struct Nil {};
auto nil = Nil{};
template typename T
struct Cons;
template typename T
using List = boost::variantNil,
boost::recursive_wrapperConsT;
template typename T
struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14395
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14341
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:13:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system.
The very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
cross-platform solution that won't require installing any
additional software but working D compiler.
I was also
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 11:04:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Are there any plans for the creation of a powerful AST-macro
system in D?
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP50
No, Walter and Andrei are against it:
On 3 April 2015 at 17:58, Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:41:34 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:39:35 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't b uild LLVM on my PowerMac. :/
Why would that be so?
I wanted to work on this a little more before announcing it, but
it seems I'm going to be busy working on trying to get
unit-threaded into std.experimental so here it is:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/reggae
If you're wondering about the name, it's because it's supposed to
build on dub.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately has caught my eye as huge no in the
description. We must ban C style separate compilation, there is
simply no way to move forward otherwise. At
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:34:05 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 10:18:11 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Chapel 1.11 just got release and they are making a big play on
the
integration of Chapel with Python. This could be huge and
potentially
disrupt the complacency of the
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system. The
very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
cross-platform solution that won't require installing any
additional software but working D compiler.
On 4/3/15 4:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/2/15 8:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hey folks, is there any way to figure out whether a type is immutable or
shared given its typeinfo? I see there's only the flags() method that
doesn't tell that. I'm thinking we'd do good to extend
On 4/3/15 4:04 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document. We're
staying the course with one important addition: switching to ddmd,
hopefully with 2.068.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:51:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/3/15 4:04 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision
document. We're
staying the course with one important
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 06:31:28 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:17:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Robin Hood sounds like a good idea, but it really isn't. Keep
your load factor reasonable and distribute values evenly, then
you don't need a LRU lookup.
Is there a D
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:05:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
There is universal binary of LLVM 2.1 with clang (llvm-gcc back
then I think) available here:
http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/llvm-llvm-gcc4.0-2.1-darwin-univ.tar.gz
Thank you so much; I'll try it immediately. I don't know why I
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:17:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:13:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system.
The very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
cross-platform solution that won't require installing
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:12:00 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 06:31:28 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:17:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Robin Hood sounds like a good idea, but it really isn't. Keep
your load factor reasonable and distribute values
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
Andrei
I'm glad to see
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14368
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/e741c24f8578498be6b11bcc76e150b4f001be3a
Fix Issue 14368 -
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14368
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:59:22 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Well, I took your advice (and one of my acceptance tests is
based off of your simplified real-work example) and started
with the low-level any-command-will-do API first. I built the
high-level ones on top of that. It doesn't seem
On 2015-03-18 12:14:01 +, Vladimir Panteleev said:
I've pushed support for DMD bootstrapping, so if you need to build
master now, build latest Digger from source. I'll make a binary release
after 2.067 is out.
Any news on this?
And will there by COFF32 support as well?
--
Robert M.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:41:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just don't have the champion for that yet. --
Andrei
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:58:03 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:41:34 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:39:35 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't b uild LLVM on my PowerMac. :/
Why would that be so?
Basically because it requires
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 17:10:31 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:12:00 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Is there a D version of a hash table with open addressing and
quadratic probing?
Now there is.
https://github.com/w0rp/dstruct/blob/master/source/dstruct/map.d
Great! I'll experiment with it and do some comparisons.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14398
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
---
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:41:34 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 14:39:35 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't b uild LLVM on my PowerMac. :/
Why would that be so?
Basically because it requires GCC 4.2 - but unfortunately
there's more.
Once upon a time,
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:51:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks Adam and Steve. Guess I should have asked this in the
learn forum :o). -- Andrei
Yeah, I have totally expected some revolutionary proposal for
RTTI improvement in D from you when opening the topic :( You have
broken
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:40:42 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:17:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:13:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system.
The very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:22:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:10:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately has caught my eye as huge no
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:55:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 17:10:31 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file
On 2015-04-03 20:06, Atila Neves wrote:
Interesting.
It's true that it's not always faster to compile each module separately,
I already knew that. It seems to me, however, that when that's actually
the case, the practical difference is negligible. Even if 10x slower,
the linker will take
Hello. I’m trying to write my own version of a list that doesn’t
rely on the garbage collector. I’m working on a very bare bones
implementation using malloc and free, but I’m running into an
exception when I attempt to call free. Here is a very minimal
code sample to illustrate the issue:
//
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14401
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:07:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-03 20:06, Atila Neves wrote:
Interesting.
It's true that it's not always faster to compile each module
separately,
I already knew that. It seems to me, however, that when that's
actually
the case, the practical
On 2015-04-03 19:03, Atila Neves wrote:
I wanted to work on this a little more before announcing it, but it
seems I'm going to be busy working on trying to get unit-threaded into
std.experimental so here it is:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/reggae
One thing I noticed immediately (unless I'm
If you are interested, we are doing a GUI system inspired by
QtQuick/QMLEngine :
https://github.com/D-Quick/DQuick
On 4/3/15 9:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just don't have the champion for that yet. -- Andrei
I might obviously be
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:08:58 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I just tried compiling one of my project. It has a makefile
that does separate compilation and a shell script I use for
unit testing which compiles everything in one go. The makefile
takes 5.3 seconds, does not including linking since
On 4/3/15 12:07 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-03 20:06, Atila Neves wrote:
Interesting.
It's true that it's not always faster to compile each module separately,
I already knew that. It seems to me, however, that when that's actually
the case, the practical difference is negligible.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 18:06:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
All I know is I've seen a definite improvement in my
edit-compile-unittest cycle by compiling modules separately.
How would the decoupling happen? Is the user supposed to
partition the binary into suitable static libraries? Or is the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14327
--- Comment #7 from Szymon Gatner szymon.gat...@gmail.com ---
Build started 2015-04-03 22:49:35.
1Project C:\Users\bravo\documents\visual studio
2012\Projects\CppDMix\CppDMix\CppDMix.vcxproj on node 2 (Build target(s)).
1ClCompile:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14381
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment #5 from
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 22:08:52 UTC, Kitt wrote:
Thanks for the help =) I guess I've been in C# land at work for
way too long now, my low level C skills are evaporating!
I've written a straight forward linked list implementation here:
On 04/03/2015 06:40 PM, w0rp wrote:
I can probably help a little, if there's a bug list of things
that need to be done, etc.
Well, there is
https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?component=websiteslist_id=199823query_format=advancedresolution=---,
but it's mostly about documentation issues.
I
On 04/03/2015 06:11 PM, w0rp wrote:
Now, I am not the most fantastic Computer Science guy in the world, and
I probably got a few things wrong. If anyone would like to look at my
code and point out mistakes, please do. I will add any improvements
suggested.
You should use triangular numbers
On 2015-04-02 23:46, Wyatt wrote:
Dealing with it at work, I find it puts us scarily at the mercy of
regexen in Ruby, which is unsettling to say the least. More pressingly,
the plain English method of writing tests hinders my ability to figure
out what the test is actually trying to do.
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
