https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
Issue ID: 15248
Summary: Function in current module is not allowed to overload
imported function
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
On Friday, 23 October 2015 at 16:37:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://dconf.org/2016/index.html
Typo: "we're grateful to benefit of their hosting" should be
"we're grateful to get the benefit of their hosting" or "we're
grateful to benefit from their hosting".
For Option see https://w0rp.com/project/dstruct/dstruct/option/
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:10:31 UTC, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 09:49:00 UTC, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing
binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
On 10/26/2015 05:48 AM, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f7a54b789a21
and results at dpaste.dzfl.pl:
-
SIMD:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 04:48:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
If you must use DMD, I recommend filing an enhancement request
and bothering Walter about it.
T
I'd really like the performance benefits to be
On 2015-10-25 19:23, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I humbly believe that D may just add special re-write rule to the switch
statement in order to allow user-defined switchable types. This goes
along nicely with the trend - e.g. foreach statement works with anything
having static range interfaces or
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15247
--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori ---
What should happen to impure destructors?
--
On Sunday, 11 October 2015 at 21:56:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 08:21:58 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
This is the voting thread for inclusion of
std.experimental.testing into phobos.
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207
Dub:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 09:49:00 UTC, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f7a54b789a21
and results at dpaste.dzfl.pl:
-
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f7a54b789a21
and results at dpaste.dzfl.pl:
-
SIMD: TickDuration(151000)
Binary: TickDuration(255000)
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 06:22:51 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle wrote:
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 05:45:15 UTC, Nerve wrote:
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 05:05:47 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Since I have no idea what the difference between Some(_),
None and default. I'll assume it's already
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Should I file a bug? Please advise.
Since there was no response, I filed:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
--
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 00:14:38 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hi all
what do you think about high level functions such as get, post,
put, delete returning a Request object with status code,
headers and content as its properties rather than just the
content? this would make things easier for n00bs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
Maxim Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mxfo...@gmail.com
On 10/25/2015 11:05 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I've been chasing after compiler hackers to update the wiki with very
little success (and then they complain how their projects are not getting enough
attention etc.).
Yeah, that's a perennial problem.
On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 02:54 +, Elie Morisse via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> The build process got much simpler 2 weeks ago though, now that
> it doesn't depend on an LLVM source tree and an external Clang
> executable anymore it's almost identical to building LDC.
In which case
On Friday, 23 October 2015 at 16:27:11 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
I'd just like to have a quick but reliable way to
store real and int data types into a binary data file and read
therefrom.
Is there such a solution?
Wow thank you people! Nice to know I can do
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
--- Comment #2 from John Colvin ---
(In reply to Jack Stouffer from comment #1)
> I would consider this as "working as intended", as the checks are only
> supposed to happen in debug mode. In a PR of mine, I asked
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 05:34:05 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu writes:
On 10/18/15 7:55 AM, Joakim wrote:
Now, the download page has not traditionally listed alphas
and betas. But the importance of mobile is so high that I
think it is worth
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 19:17:13 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
there is nothing stopping us from allowing
onAssertFailed!"!="
to be defined as long as the compiler lowering logic can do the
correct rewrite.
For further details, see also:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 19:31:26 UTC, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:49:26 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/21/2015 12:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
My experience with immutable containers is that their
performance is
trash precisely because you can't
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 21:25:58 UTC, Cleverson wrote:
Hello,
Is there any library or module for easily managing basic audio
functions, e.g., play/pause/stop a sound? I can't find it
amongst the standard library and the packages colection, or
maybe I don't know how to search properly,
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 21:29:47 UTC, default0 wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:30:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd will never reach gdc/ldc performance, gcc and LLVM have
entire teams of people that actively contribute to their
compilers.
We have a Walter though :-)
Walter has a
I know this has basically no chance of ever actually being added
because that is the way of all "I want feature X" threads, but I
thought I would post this anyways because I seem to want it
constantly.
So we have TemplateThisParameters methods which are cool but have
some drawbacks.
They are
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 00:07:36 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I don't understand all uses of the request but typeid() returns
a TypeInfo reference, which is about the actual type of an
object. The following change produces the expected output in
this case (except, it has the added module
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 00:27:46 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
...
crap, copy paste error
change the main to
void main()
{
A a = new A();
a.foo(); // prints nothing
a.bar(); // prints nothing
B b = new B();
b.foo(); // prints X
b.bar(); //
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:49:26 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/21/2015 12:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
My experience with immutable containers is that their
performance is
trash precisely because you can't mutate them.
That's actually the experience in the Scala community.
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 17:50:13 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 17:36:37 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 15:17:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Yes, that's my plan.
[...]
I haven't thought about that in detail. One way would be to
have a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15246
--- Comment #2 from Marco Leise ---
Here is the loop that iterates the inheritance chain from up to Object and
calls destructors (if defined):
Hello,
Is there any library or module for easily managing basic audio
functions, e.g., play/pause/stop a sound? I can't find it amongst
the standard library and the packages colection, or maybe I don't
know how to search properly, since I'm new to D and its ecosystem.
Thank you,
Cleverson
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 17:36:37 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Eventhough compiler rewrites
X != Y
into
!(X == Y)
and we cannot explicit overload opBinary!"!=" there is nothing
stopping us allowing
onBinaryAssert!"!="
in the rewriter.
Correction:
there is nothing stopping us
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233
briancsch...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||15250
--
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 18:46:45 UTC, Dandyvica wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out a solution to implement a generic tree
or array container whose nodes
can either be elements or a subtree (or sub-array).
Pretty much like you can do in Python:
l = [1, 2, [1, 2, 3], 4]
l is a list
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 19:26:08 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 18:46:45 UTC, Dandyvica wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out a solution to implement a generic tree
or array container whose nodes
can either be elements or a subtree (or sub-array).
Pretty much like you
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15246
Marco Leise changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
---
Forgot to say, it may be for Windows only, in case a portable
version isn't available.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15250
Issue ID: 15250
Summary: Grammar does not contain rules for multiple slices in
an index expression
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
URL:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 12:35:39 UTC, Don wrote:
You need to be very careful with doing benchmarks on tiny test
cases, they can be very misleading.
Can you advice some reading about benchmark?
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:37:17 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 04:48:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
If you must use DMD, I recommend filing an enhancement request
and bothering Walter
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 19:31:26 UTC, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:49:26 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/21/2015 12:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
My experience with immutable containers is that their
performance is
trash precisely because you can't
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:53:18 UTC, Dandyvica wrote:
Thanks Meta, great idea.
But does I'd like to have something like dynamic arrays and be
able to do this:
class A(T) { T _v; this(T v) { _v = v; } }
auto myContainer = MyContainerArray!(A!int)();
myContainer ~= new A!int(1);
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:30:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd will never reach gdc/ldc performance, gcc and LLVM have
entire teams of people that actively contribute to their
compilers.
We have a Walter though :-)
On 10/26/2015 10:19 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
This is for D.learn, I'd suggest asking there (probably putting your code on a
pastebin site to link in).
Does pastebin code last forever? If it is ephemeral, it'd be better to include
it in the posting.
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 02:37:18 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
I've been playing around with perf and my web server and found
that the bottleneck is by far the math module of Botan:
https://github.com/etcimon/botan/blob/master/source/botan/math/mp/mp_core.d
[...]
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15246
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Marco Leise from comment #1)
> You are assuming that destructors are inherited and there is an implicit
> super-call, but they are actually chained and called one after
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 17:36:37 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I'll update
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP83
with a proposed solution for `!=`-lowering.
Update along with other changes...done.
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 07:35:49 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Example:
double x = 0, y = 0, z = 0;
auto json = parseTrustedJSON(`{ "coordinates": [ { "x": 1,
"y": 2, "z": 3 }, … ] }`);
foreach (idx; json.coordinates)
{
// Provide one function for each key you are
On 10/26/2015 08:31 PM, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/21/2015 12:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
My experience with immutable containers is that their performance is
trash precisely because you can't mutate them.
That's
I just noticed these multiple terminologies:
* from the compiler --help, -H refers to a 'header' file
* the compiler online page refers to it as 'D interface' file
* The generated .di file first line comment says 'D import file'
I know they refer to the same thing but how is this kind of
On 10/26/2015 04:25 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
##
class A
{
void foo(this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
void bar(auto override this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
}
class B : A {}
void main()
{
A a = new A();
a.foo(); // prints "A"
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:46:21 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/26/2015 08:31 PM, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:49:26 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/21/2015 12:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
My experience with immutable containers is that their
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 21:25:58 UTC, Cleverson wrote:
Hello,
Is there any library or module for easily managing basic audio
functions, e.g., play/pause/stop a sound? I can't find it
amongst the standard library and the packages colection, or
maybe I don't know how to search properly,
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 00:07:36 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/26/2015 04:25 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
##
class A
{
void foo(this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
void bar(auto override this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
}
class B : A {}
void main()
Available as dub package:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/scod
Example:
http://martinnowak.github.io/bloom/bloom.html
We're currently working on dub integration of other doc generation tools
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/pull/702), for the time
being you can use scod like so.
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 23:13:22 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 21:29:47 UTC, default0 wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:30:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
dmd will never reach gdc/ldc performance, gcc and LLVM have
entire teams of people that actively contribute to
Hello everyone,
Following a number of discussions with Walter regarding lifetime
management for class objects, we've had a small epiphany: we need to
frame collaboration better. Let me explain.
There are a number of very good folks here with type system-y stuff:
Timon, Amaury, Michel, and
On 27/10/15 3:45 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Following a number of discussions with Walter regarding lifetime
management for class objects, we've had a small epiphany: we need to
frame collaboration better. Let me explain.
There are a number of very good folks here with
Elie - thanks for posting the build. Have been working on
something else past day, but this is on my list to look at next.
Having quantlib work would be very nice for many financial users.
Lots of people use it, even just as a check on their own stuff.
Russell, I agree about the plotting,
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 02:21:40 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 23:13:22 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
[...]
Someone who says never is certainly making a bold claim in an
uncertain world at a time when the basic factors governing the
fate of D are visibly
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 02:45:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
So by this I'm asking folks' participation to a study group on
object lifetime. Walter and I believe we must make reference
counting for classes work, and that Rust-style schemes are too
complex for their own good. But
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 23:25:49 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I know this has basically no chance of ever actually being
added because that is the way of all "I want feature X"
threads, but I thought I would post this anyways because I seem
to want it constantly.
[...]
Stole the words
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 03:14:55 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 02:21:40 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 23:13:22 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
[...]
Someone who says never is certainly making a bold claim in an
uncertain world at a time when the
for example
class A;
{
void doSomething() {}
}
A *a = cast(A *) new A;
then I call a.doSomething(); my program "Segmentation fault"
how could it happened? and how i use it correctly?
3q, please tell me, 3q 3q 3q!
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 03:10:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:21:38AM +, Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
So I would suggest it isn't productive to think about whether
Dmd will catch up. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter. Making
it faster will help
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 05:34:05 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
>> I think it makes sense to add a link to the LDC iOS releases in
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Compilers. Perhaps a row for iOS in table
>> "Package and/or binary availability,
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 02:21:40 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
In addition, it's mildly demoralising to others to say such
things, no matter how good ones intent might be.
My intentions are to call things as they are. If people are
demoralized after learning that one person working in his
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:21:38AM +, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> So I would suggest it isn't productive to think about whether Dmd will
> catch up. Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter. Making it faster will
> help many - this defeatist attitude of 'why bother - just use GDC
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 19:02:50 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 19:00:57 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
One thing about variant is that if the struct you are trying
to insert is larger then (void delegate()).sizeof it will
allocate the wrapped type on the gc
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out a solution to implement a generic tree or
array container whose nodes
can either be elements or a subtree (or sub-array).
Pretty much like you can do in Python:
l = [1, 2, [1, 2, 3], 4]
l is a list of (integers or list of integers).
Any idea on how to do
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 12:10:41 UTC, rumbu wrote:
Interpolation search is even faster :)
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/4443c5753454
For a funny name it's called Newton search: you can use
interpolation of higher order, can be more efficient if the data
has a trend.
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 03:53:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 03:44:31 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
First, isn't Vector!(float,3) a template which creates a tuple
consisting of float, float, float; so aren't the argument
types identical?
I'm not familiar with the
The problem is that the compiler and linker are separate
programs; the compiler has to generate input for the linker in
the form of a file.
RDMD automatically cleans up all the .obj garbage, so one
solution is to run
rdmd --build-only asdf.d
Also, the -of flag is a little more
The subject line says it all. Every time I compile a D file to an executable
I get an unwanted .o file and have to manually clean up things. I'm using
DMD 2.0.68.2.
-of doesn't help, and my God, it doesn't even allow a space or equal sign
between itself and the desired name of the output file
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15247
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #1)
> What should happen to impure destructors?
They just are introduced as impure and work (because they may call pure
destructors).
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12034
ponce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 26-Oct-2015 12:16, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-10-25 19:23, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I humbly believe that D may just add special re-write rule to the switch
statement in order to allow user-defined switchable types. This goes
along nicely with the trend - e.g. foreach statement works with
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:40:09 UTC, Edmund Smith wrote:
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 06:22:51 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
You could also emulate constant matching using default
parameters (albeit with the restriction that they must be after
any non-default/constant parameters), since
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 08:56:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It is my understanding that the GC does not normally ever
return memory to the OS
It seems that it does now. In smallAlloc() and bigAlloc(), if
allocation fails it collects garbage and then:
if (lowMem) minimize();
On
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249
Issue ID: 15249
Summary: Floating-point division should multiply by inverse if
lossless.
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Correction: you said
"the GC does not normally ever return memory"
and you're right, because applications do not "normally" consume
>95% of their address space.
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:47:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/26/2015 05:48 AM, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing
binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
On 10/24/15 1:25 PM, tsbockman wrote:
While improving the DMD front-end's constant folding:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5229
I found out about DMD issue 14835:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14835
Briefly:
///
module main;
On 26 Oct 2015 1:40 pm, "Don via Digitalmars-d"
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 19:37:32 UTC, Iakh wrote:
>>
>> Here is my implementatation of SIMD find. Function returns index of
ubyte in static 16 byte array with unique values.
>
>
> [snip]
>
> You need to
On 10/26/2015 06:01 AM, Don wrote:
On Friday, 23 October 2015 at 16:37:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://dconf.org/2016/index.html
Typo: "we're grateful to benefit of their hosting" should be "we're
grateful to get the benefit of their hosting" or "we're grateful to
benefit from their
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:47:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/26/2015 05:48 AM, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing
binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 04:48:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d
> >wrote:
> >
> >If you must use DMD, I recommend filing an enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15027
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15027
--- Comment #20 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/3a8a9ea7939cf2e5c4a6452597681975ad3fb866
std.file fixes for
On Friday, 23 October 2015 at 16:37:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please join us at DConf 2016, the conference of the D
programming language in Berlin, Germany, May 4-6 2016.
Berlin. Germany. Europe. Yay just some hours off Venice :)
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:55:48 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
The subject line says it all. Every time I compile a D file to
an executable I get an unwanted .o file and have to manually
clean up things. I'm using DMD 2.0.68.2.
Do you mean:
-odobjdir write object & library files
On 25 Oct 2015 11:50 pm, "Iakh via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 22:17:58 UTC, Matthias Bentrup wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 19:37:32 UTC, Iakh wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it optimal and how do you implement this stuf?
>>>
>>
>> I think
On 2015-10-26 12:40, Edmund Smith wrote:
You could also emulate constant matching using default parameters
(albeit with the restriction that they must be after any
non-default/constant parameters), since the defaults form part of the
function's type. I tried making something like this earlier
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
--- Comment #1 from ponce ---
Still happens with DMD64 D Compiler v2.069.0-b2
--
On 26-Oct-2015 16:44, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 04:48:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:37:16AM +, Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
If you must
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 19:37:32 UTC, Iakh wrote:
Here is my implementatation of SIMD find. Function returns
index of ubyte in static 16 byte array with unique values.
[snip]
You need to be very careful with doing benchmarks on tiny test
cases, they can be very misleading.
Be aware
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12692
ponce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Thursday, 1 October 2015 at 11:51:29 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 21:02:42 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
As a follow-up to
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207#issuecomment-144073495
I added a long comment about a new more flexible solution to
this
sorry,My english is poot.
file asm.h
/*
是bootasm.S汇编文件所需要的头文件,主要是一些与X86保护模式的段访问方式相关的宏定义
*/
#ifndef __BOOT_ASM_H__
#define __BOOT_ASM_H__
/* Assembler macros to create x86 segments */
/* Normal segment */
#define SEG_NULLASM
On 10/26/2015 08:35 AM, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 19:37:32 UTC, Iakh wrote:
Here is my implementatation of SIMD find. Function returns index of
ubyte in static 16 byte array with unique values.
[snip]
You need to be very careful with doing benchmarks on tiny test cases,
they
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo